Well, I'm not convinced that it's a quotation to begin with, and a chain of historical events has to line up just right for your theory to work. It's a lot simpler to jsut accept the canon cause the Church canonized it.
SD
Well, I'm not convinced that it's a quotation to begin with, and a chain of historical events has to line up just right for your theory to work. It's a lot simpler to jsut accept the canon cause the Church canonized it.It is not MY theory *grin* it a point of scholarship, I am not that smart.
We accept the canon because we believe the Holy Spirit worked in that group of men to preserve the books that were inspired. One thing does not negate the other. It is simply a point of interest that Paul would comfirm Luke's Book as scripture.