Skip to comments.
Where Have All the FR Protestants Gone? [A Month Later]
drstevej
Posted on 05/19/2003 6:31:16 AM PDT by drstevej
Thread from last month...
------------
Where Have All the FR Protestants Gone?
drstevej
Posted on 04/08/2003 12:29 PM CDT by drstevej
OBSERVATIONS:
[1] There seems to be a significantly reduced number of Protestant Threads (KJV Only being the exception for sure) in the FR Religion Forum.
[2] There seems to be a reduced number of FR Protestant posts in the Religion Forum.
This thread is a place to discuss these observations.
------------
Now the transformation to a Catholic Religion Forum is almost complete. Must be a Marian miracle or an answer to Jim Robinson's prayer, "Can't we all just get along?" Now all the dissent is within the RC fold ... NO Mass vs. Tridentine Mass. Boredom has descended, the moderators are free to nap without fear of an **** awakening them.
Could someone arrange for a funeral mass? (a clown mass in this case might be in order).
-- Pope Piel I (thinking of abdicating prior to even assuming the Chair of Peter)
TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 581-595 next last
To: Aloysius
So would the anticipated Mass celebrated (not offered) well before sunset on Saturday be illicit?Honestly I don't know what the cutoff times for licitness are. It seems to me, that there could be some geographical and cultural leeway. Aren't you heartened to learn that something you would call a novelty actually makes sense? Do you think you might discover you have other misconceptions?
To: Tantumergo
Here is what Cardinal Ratzinger himself has said:
"When the council fathers replaced the word "is" with the word "subsistit," they did so for a very precise reason. The concept expressed by "is" (to be) is far broader than that expressed by "to subsist." "To subsist" is a very precise way of being, that is, to be as a subject, which exists in itself. Thus the Council fathers meant to say that the being of the Church as such is a broader entity than the Roman Catholic Church, but within the latter it acquires, in an incomparable way, the charater of a true and proper subject." L'Osservatore Romano, October 8, 2000.
In this quote by the Cardinal, it should be noted that when he uses the phrase "the Church" he means something broader than "the Catholic Church." He means the "Church of Christ" which includes, according to him, the Orthodox churches and other Christian bodies.
To: Loyalist
There is no Catholic tradition to support the practice of Saturday evening Mass.There is a long, long Catholic tradition that the day begins with the preceding evening. Take a look at a breviary.
To: Tantumergo
"Show me where in any school of classical theology that any entity can have more than one subsistence."
You are confusing two different words--"substance" and "subsistence." For something to "subsist" in something means that it exists UNDER some other entity not itself. It does NOT establish identity.
To: Loyalist
You didn't reply to my Easter Vigil question, which was celebrated as a "vigil," and attendance at which was considered attendance at an Easter Mass.
There IS precedent.
To: drstevej
The sunshine is not the sun. His virtual presence is not his Real Presence.
To: drstevej
"Which is it?
the one timeless sacrifice
or
the one sacrifice reenacted"
Both. Timeless and within time--same as Christ Himself.
To: St.Chuck
There is a long, long Catholic tradition that the day begins with the preceding evening. Take a look at a breviary. If anticipated Mass were consistent with that tradition, it would have been practiced long before now.
408
posted on
05/20/2003 8:14:27 PM PDT
by
Loyalist
(Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
To: ultima ratio
***The sunshine is not the sun.***
The sun is also only in one location. You argur the Son is in many places at once.
***His virtual presence is not his Real Presence. ***
Lo I am with you always... was He teasing?
409
posted on
05/20/2003 8:15:24 PM PDT
by
drstevej
(FR token Protestant)
To: St.Chuck
Aren't you heartened to learn that something you would call a novelty actually makes sense? It doesn't make sense. You are citing Jewish law to defend a novelty of new Catholicism. Does this mean that one is forbidden from servile work on Saturday evening?
To: drstevej
Now you're getting cute. If you get right down to it, nothing is analogous and all speech fails.
To: sinkspur
You didn't reply to my Easter Vigil question, which was celebrated as a "vigil," and attendance at which was considered attendance at an Easter Mass. And only at Easter Vigil, which had been moving earlier and earlier into the day.
Pius XII rightly had it moved back to a later time so that Mass could begin at midnight in proper fulfilment of the Sunday obligation.
Yes, sometimes there was widespread liturgical abuse before Vatican II. But at least it was corrected.
412
posted on
05/20/2003 8:18:50 PM PDT
by
Loyalist
(Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
To: Loyalist
If anticipated Mass were consistent with that tradition, it would have been practiced long before now. It was. THE EASTER VIGIL!
And where do you get the notion that the Church cannot make changes to worship schedules?
Holy Days of Obligation have been added, and deleted, and combined, and moved to Sundays, throughout history. Laws of fast and abstinence have been changed, and the recitation of the Divine Office, long considered an obligation binding under pain of mortal sin for those in Orders, can be dispensed by a bishop for almost any reason.
To: ultima ratio
You're the one who said, "The sunshine is not the sun" Amid my humor, lame as it might be, was a point.
414
posted on
05/20/2003 8:22:51 PM PDT
by
drstevej
(FR token Protestant)
To: Land of the Irish
The Saturday Vigil is called "The Fisherman's Mass." Do the math.
To: Tantumergo
ORTHODOX N.O. Catholic.An oxymoron, IMHO.
To: Loyalist
Pius XII rightly had it moved back to a later time so that Mass could begin at midnight in proper fulfilment of the Sunday obligation. We attended the Easter Vigil every year, faithfully, and I can't recall it every beginning any later than 8:00.
This was in the late 50s and early 60s. Our Italian monsignor was not one to play fast and loose with the rules, either.
Anticipated Saturday evening masses were allowed in mission dioceses with a shortage of priests, as well.
This is another instance where the ultra-trads marginalize themselves, with their jots and tittles.
The FSSP, which is widely admired around here, also celebrates the Tridentine Mass on Saturday evenings.
I'll bet that chaps, doesn't it?
To: sinkspur
And where do you get the notion that the Church cannot make changes to worship schedules? From the Third Commandment, and the New Covenant through whose light it must be read. The Church is the sole and proper interpreter of Scripture, but even she cannot make it say what it does not say.
The Church can change all manner of Holy Days and related obligations except the Sabbath obligation.
418
posted on
05/20/2003 8:27:40 PM PDT
by
Loyalist
(Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
To: Loyalist
You all are driving me nuts.
The Saturday Sabbath Vigil was instituted to accomodate fishermen who worked on Sunday morning, which is why it wasn't everywhere. They are on the boats before dawn and there was no Mass for them, so...it became a Mass of convenience for everybody else.
To: Loyalist
If anticipated Mass were consistent with that tradition, it would have been practiced long before now.I'm just suggesting that the Saturday anticipated mass shouldn't raise much of a ruckus, as there is a precedence for such observances.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 581-595 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson