Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
You didn't reply to my Easter Vigil question, which was celebrated as a "vigil," and attendance at which was considered attendance at an Easter Mass.

And only at Easter Vigil, which had been moving earlier and earlier into the day.

Pius XII rightly had it moved back to a later time so that Mass could begin at midnight in proper fulfilment of the Sunday obligation.

Yes, sometimes there was widespread liturgical abuse before Vatican II. But at least it was corrected.

412 posted on 05/20/2003 8:18:50 PM PDT by Loyalist (Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: Loyalist
Pius XII rightly had it moved back to a later time so that Mass could begin at midnight in proper fulfilment of the Sunday obligation.

We attended the Easter Vigil every year, faithfully, and I can't recall it every beginning any later than 8:00.

This was in the late 50s and early 60s. Our Italian monsignor was not one to play fast and loose with the rules, either.

Anticipated Saturday evening masses were allowed in mission dioceses with a shortage of priests, as well.

This is another instance where the ultra-trads marginalize themselves, with their jots and tittles.

The FSSP, which is widely admired around here, also celebrates the Tridentine Mass on Saturday evenings.

I'll bet that chaps, doesn't it?

417 posted on 05/20/2003 8:27:39 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson