Skip to comments.
Could I ask a serious question of some Mormons? (Please?)
today
| me
Posted on 01/19/2003 12:18:35 PM PST by Jael
No man who rejects the testimony of Joseph Smith can enter the kingdom of God"
Doctrines of Salvation, vol. I, p. 190).
My question:
Is that what Mormons believe?
If so, how was anyone saved before 1830.
TOPICS: Apologetics; General Discusssion; History; Other Christian
KEYWORDS: mormonbeliefs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-390 next last
To: HarryDunne
Harry you do not evenb believe your own scripture..
"And now it came to pass that the people of Nephi, under the reign of the second king, began to grow hard in their hearts, and indulge themselves somewhat in wicked practices, such as like unto David of old desiring many wives and concubines, and also Solomon, his son" - Jacob 1:15
"But the word of God burdens me because of your grosser crimes. For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in commiting whoredoms, because of the things which were written concerning David, and Solomon his son. Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord. Wherefore, thus saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise up unto me a righteous branch from the fruit of the loins of Joseph. Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that his people shall do like unto them of old. Wherefore, my brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife; and concubines he shall have none; For I, the Lord God, delight in the chastity of women. And whoredoms are an abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of Hosts...for they shall not commit whoredoms, like unto them of old, saith the Lord of Hosts" - Jacob 2:23-28, 33
"For behold, he [King Noah] did not keep the commandments of God, but he did walk after the desires of his own heart. And he had many wives and concubines. And he did cause his people to commit sin, and do that which was abominable in the sight of the Lord. Yea, and they did commit whoredoms and all manner of wickedness" - Mosiah 11:2
"When thou art come unto the land which the Eternal thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me .... Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away" (Deut. 17:14, 17).
To: RnMomof7
Again, show me one scripture where it says Jacob/Israel was condemned for having more than one wife.
To: HarryDunne
Jacob 23 But the word of God burdens me because of your grosser crimes. For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing awhoredoms, because of the things which were written concerning David, and Solomon his son.
24 Behold, David and aSolomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was cabominable before me, saith the Lord.
25 Wherefore, thus saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise up unto me a arighteous branch from the fruit of the loins of Joseph.
26 Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that this people shall do like unto them of old.
27 Wherefore, my brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For there shall not any aman among you have save it be bone cwife; and concubines he shall have none;
Sounds to me like God had a pretty firm opinion
To: RnMomof7; Grig
There is no mention of Jacob/Israel in any of those scriptures, which proves my point: God never condemned Jacob/Israel for practicing polygamy.
To: HarryDunne
I love it..I post from your own corrupt writtings and you still deny it...unbelievable...So I assume then you plan on practing plural marriage as it is a requirment for progression per JS...
To: RnMomof7
Are you Mormon-bashing again?
To: HarryDunne
No I am just stating the fact that JS wrote the BOM and said it was an abomination to God and later said it was required for progression..how do you deal with that?
To: RnMomof7
Are you surprised?
When someone is spirtually blind, the obvious is lost.
368
posted on
01/27/2003 12:51:26 PM PST
by
Wrigley
To: RnMomof7
So, whatever question you feel like answering, I'm supposed to answer, but if I ask a question or want to debate a point which you started, you're allowed to change subjects ad nauseam? If this is how you debate, I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to pass.
To: Wrigley
When someone is spirtually blind, the obvious is lost. I take offense to that and ask that you apologize.
To: HarryDunne; Wrigley
What facts do you offer that prove that you are not spiritually blind?
371
posted on
01/27/2003 1:06:01 PM PST
by
xzins
(Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
To: xzins
Hmmm. Good point. Who does have proof? I withdraw my previous post.
To: HarryDunne
Not being spiritually blind would be supported by facts that reasonably document the veracity of your beliefs.
373
posted on
01/27/2003 1:15:21 PM PST
by
xzins
(Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
To: xzins
Incorrect.
To: RnMomof7
"No I am just stating the fact that JS wrote the BOM and said it was an abomination to God and later said it was required for progression..how do you deal with that?"
How many times have I pointed you to verse 30 now?
What problem there is isn't with dealing with anything Joseph Smith said or what is in the BoM, it is in dealing with minds so closed that they repeatedly ignore what is said to them. Your attempts to show Jacob/Isreal and David as repenting of polygamy are laughable.
375
posted on
01/27/2003 1:25:52 PM PST
by
Grig
To: xzins
Incorrect because your definition is open to interpretation in that you decide what is reasonable.
To: HarryDunne
It surely isn't incorrect.
Facts about your beliefs will determine if they are reasonably connected to reality or not reasonably connected to reality
The teaching of the resurrection of Jesus, for example, has a reasonable collection of facts demonstrating that the resurrection to be a probable reality.
377
posted on
01/27/2003 1:28:28 PM PST
by
xzins
(Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
To: HarryDunne
Of course I do. I must first determine if I AM SPIRITUALLY BLIND as determined by verifiable facts.
It is only then that I can attempt to persuade others as to the legitimacy of those facts.
378
posted on
01/27/2003 1:30:24 PM PST
by
xzins
(Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
To: Grig
What problem there is isn't with dealing with anything Joseph Smith said or what is in the BoM, it is in dealing with minds so closed that they repeatedly ignore what is said to them. Your attempts to show Jacob/Isreal and David as repenting of polygamy are laughable. Grig did not JS pen the BOM? In it does he not relate God calling polygamy an abomination (in the book of jacob yet)...Harry came looking for me ..you are dodging and weaving my friend...do you have an answer?
BTW you have not proved that Jacob took a wife after God took Rachel following His conversion...or that David ever had sexual relations with the women he put away after he repented following the death of his son...
To: RnMomof7; Grig
Harry came looking for me ..you are dodging and weaving my friend...do you have an answer?As if you aren't. There is no proof of God condemning Jacob for practicing polygamy. You couldn't prove it, so you changed the subject, etc. Just concede the point and we can move on.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-390 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson