Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Judith Reisman, Advises Catholic Church to Sue the Sex Experts for Medical Malpractice
Catholic C itizens of Illinois ^

Posted on 12/30/2002 9:39:02 AM PST by boromeo

Dr. Judith Reisman, Debunker of Kinsey Sex Research, Advises Catholic Church to Sue the Sex Experts for Medical Malpractice

Thursday, December 26, 2002

By Karl Maurer, Vice President

As the sex scandal in the Catholic Church continues to unfold, the most shocking aspect is not so much the abuse itself, but that molester priests were repeatedly given access to children, even after they were known to be child molesters. While the Bishops are in a large part responsible for the sex scandal in the church, there is a growing body of evidence pointing to an enormous fraud perpetrated on the Catholic Church by so-called sex "experts" who consulted to the Bishops and allegedly "treated" sex abuser priests.

What if these "experts", who claimed that child molesting priests could be reformed and then repatriated to their parishes, weren't really experts at all? What if they were quack doctors, who believed there was fundamentally nothing wrong with adult/child sexually contact? What if their so-called treatments never showed success, and in fact were never intended to stop child sexual abuse?

This is the thesis advanced by Dr. Judith Reisman, Ph. D., who believes that the entire field of sexology, established by the notorious Dr. Alfred Kinsey, is a fraud. Dr. Reisman also believes that the so-called treatments given to predator priests in Kinsey inspired therapy sessions were so grossly ineffective, that the Catholic Church and the victims of clerical sexual abuse have a legal claim against these sex clinics for medical malpractice. She is currently consulting with several attorneys regarding class action suits whereby the Catholic laity can seek damages.

Dr. Reisman, Ph.D. visited Chicago in November to discuss these issues and the second edition of her landmark book, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences at the invitation of Catholic Citizens of Illinois, a lay group founded in 1996 which offers a monthly luncheon and speaker forum open to the public.

After completing her doctorate studies in mass communication in 1980, Dr. Reisman entered an investigation into Dr. Kinsey . In 1998, she published the first edition of Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, which exposed Dr. Kinsey, for the first time, as an academic fraud and a bi/homosexual responsible for massive child molestation.

Long before the Catholic Church made the headlines for the child abuse scandals, Dr. Alfred Kinsey, the so-called father of the Sexual Revolution, was quietly employing child abusers and homosexuals as researchers. In spite of the fact that Kinsey was a bi/homosexual, criminally responsible for massive child molestation, and an academic fraud, he obtained the financial backing of the notorious Rockefeller Foundation. Kinsey's research was ultimately used to eliminate laws that banned pornography and sexual deviancy in all fifty states. In the process, he ignited the Sexual Revolution of the Sixties. Kinsey was so influential on American culture that in 1989 the National Research Council pronounced that American society could be divided into "Pre- and Post Kinsey" eras.

Dr. Reisman's investigation has revealed that the Institute for Sex Research at Indiana University ("IU"), led by Dr. Kinsey, was responsible for the criminal sexual abuse of over 300 infants and children, the results of which were published in Kinsey's 1948 report on male sexuality. Dr. Reisman also revealed that Kinsey's female 'research' subjects would have included large numbers of prostitutes, the only women willing to candidly discuss their sex lives with him. For his "normal" male subjects, Kinsey used prison inmates, where homosexuality was rampant .

By performing his 'research' on a population on children, and men and women who were totally unrepresentative of the larger U.S. population, Kinsey's results were hopelessly flawed. Not only was Kinsey aware of this fraud, but his financiers at the Rockefeller Foundation were also aware. All parties knew that in the end, the 'research' needed to serve as evidence that sex laws needed to be overturned.

Dr. Reisman opened her lecture by showing a 1998 video "Kinsey's Paedophiles," produced by Britian's Yorkshire Television. The video was based largely on the results of Dr. Reisman's findings and documents the existence of known child abusers on Kinsey's research team, including a Nazi in Germany who had abused imprisoned children during World War Two. As of this time, no public television station in the United States has shown the program, in spite of being sent copies, and in contrast to the openly pro-gay programming frequently aired on public television.

Dr. Reisman noted that, "the members of the Catholic Church have a unique opportunity during this catastrophic challenge to help the entire nation to pull itself out of the very tragic place it has fallen into." In addition to a catastrophic loss of faith within the Church hierarchy, the hidden source of the current child sexual abuse scandal "is the constant stream of immorality in the media and popular culture that has polluted the nation and the Church. The main source of the sexual scandal today is Dr. Kinsey's sexual revolution."

Dr. Reisman pointed out that the media's use of the term ephebophilia to describe the abuse by priests is an intentionally misleading manipulation of language. "The main problem has been priests having sex with boys. Ephebophilia can by definition be heterosexual or homosexual assault. What we see today are almost exclusively homosexual assaults of boys, 'pederasty', and it has a long history. Ephebophilia has no validity in terms of what is taking place in the Catholic Church."

"The idea that homosexuality is not about pederasty and abusing boys is not sustained by the data," said Dr. Reisman. "One of the most notorious lesbian activists, Camille Paglia, noted how ridiculous it is that the American public is being conned into believing homosexuality is not about boys. Maintaining one's youth through the sexual abuse of boys, that is the history of homosexuality going back to the ancient Greeks."

As for the current propaganda alleging children are 'born gay', Dr. Reisman stated, "There are no scientific data confirming children are born homosexual. Historically and cross-culturally, the data confirm the exact opposite, that homosexuality is environmentally created and can be reversed." However, cautioned Dr. Reisman, in cases of pederasty, pedophilia, and other forms of sexual child abuse, there are no data confirming reversal or rehabilitation, as the recent experiences of the Catholic Church have demonstrated.

A publication by the North American Man Boy Love Association, co-found by the notorious Boston child molester Rev. Paul Shanley, cited Kinsey as the father of the pedophile and pederast movements. The article stated , "Gay liberationists in general, and boy lovers in particular, should know Kinsey's work and hold it dear. Implicit in Kinsey is the struggle we fight today."

Dr. Reisman highlighted the recent statements of Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz, who has insisted, "questions should be asked about the clinics and treatment centers used by Bishops, and the faulty counsel by various kinds of sexologists, psychologists and other assorted 'experts' who advised recycling predatory priests."

In response to Bishop Bruskewitz's call, Dr. Reisman has developed a proposal mapping out the legal strategy for suing the "treatment centers" that accepted predatory priests fraudulently promising to rehabilitate them. The report was recently hand delivered to Pope John Paul II. "We have to face the fact," noted Dr. Reisman, "that just as there are closet pederast priests, and even Bishops, there are pederast therapists," and they have been misleading the Church for decades. As of this date, there has been no response from the Vatican regarding Dr. Reisman's proposals.

Dr. Reisman noted that legal precedence for culpability of therapists for fraudulent malpractice has already established by a $5.7 million award in 1984 against one such center, which had established a record for treating and releasing sexual predators who continued to prey on children after they had been allegedly "cured."

Referencing a growing mountain of evidence, Dr. Reisman declared it a well know fact that for decades parish school children, seminarians and priests in the Catholic Church have been counseled and taught using Kinsey's perverted and fraudulently derived theories of sexuality. In fact, "They (seminarians) have been taught the Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) process that was created at the Institute for the Study of Advanced Sexuality in San Francisco, which was founded by Dr. Wardell Pomeroy, Dr. Kinsey's one time lover. Pomeroy who not only endorsed wife-swapping and homosexuality, but has also extolled the virtues of child sex and even bestiality."

We often hear of predatory priests who were "treated in California" and later released. What the media fails to mention is that they were treated at Kinsey based centers where the 'experts' all believe homosexuality is completely natural, and that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with adults who prefer to have sex with children, according to Dr. Reisman.

In fact, notes Dr. Reisman, Kinsey's 'research' was not designed to simply liberate America from outdated and restrictive sexual morality, which is a common misconception. "Kinsey meant to undermine the legal protections for the institution of marriage," writes Reisman in her book, and the legal legacy of Kinsey's efforts is an accelerating desent of our culture into pornography, protected by a perversion of laws governing freedom of speech.

" The "Sex Offenses" section defining "normal sexuality" of The Model Penal Code of the American Law Institute ("ALI") that changed all our sex laws was 100% the work of Dr. Alfred Kinsey," Reisman noted. "The ALI is the educational arm of the American Bar Association ("ABA") which educates our lawyers. If you are being taught fraud in your law school, via Dr. Kinsey, how can one be expected to go into a courtroom and argue effectively?" It was the introduction of Kinsey's sexology 'findings' into major law schools, via the ALI Model Penal Code, that began the process of repealing state laws, according to Dr. Reisman.

Kinseyites in all the top the law schools, according to Dr. Reisman, published law review articles demanding we lighten our allegedly repressive sex laws. "It was a small cabal of lawyers, psychologists, and Kinsey," said Reisman. "These people went about quietly, state by state, creating commission reports on sex that were forwarded to the state legislatures. The legislatures then responded by implementing the ALI/MPC recommendations. Prostitution, "contributing to the delinquency of a minor, sodomy, all of these laws crumbled when Kinsey 's fraudulent data were presented to state lawmakers."

"Kinsey broke down the structures that were put into place in our society to protect children, women, and the family structure," Dr. Reisman observes. " Look at the data regarding sex in the late 1940's. Abortion was illegal and contraception was difficult to obtain, especially for a single person. If what Kinsey was saying about the commonality of co-habitation, sex out of wedlock, prostitution and promiscuity were true, we would have had epidemic rates of "illegitimacy," sexually transmitted diseases , rape, and child sexual abuse. In fact, there were no such epidemics, because nonmarital sexual activity simply did not exist on anywhere near the scale Kinsey claimed.

Dr. Reisman noted, "Kinsey said he found that children were 100% orgasmic, even babies. 96% of our men are male sex offenders, 50% of husbands and 26% of wives were adulterers, and 90% of all single pregnant girls were having abortions… He claimed that the majority of all American men and women were bi-sexual…Which begs the question -- how does he know all this?" Dr. Reisman speculates that Kinsey's Midwestern university credentials were critical in suppressing protest. In her book, Dr. Reisman includes public relations photos and campaigns that were used to give the public the impression that Kinsey was an otherwise normal and serious scholar, and the con worked. "Nobody asked how he knew about the children's orgasms," noted Dr. Reisman, "because it was assumed that Kinsey's university research was scientific, and guess what? It wasn't scientific at all. It was fraud!"

"What's the fallout?" asks Reisman, "Just look around. If law and society say that out of wedlock births are OK and sadomasochism or bestiality are just alternative lifestyles, how can law and society say that any kind of obscenity is wrong? You can't make pornography illegal if its OK for people to be doing anything they want outside of marriage. If that's the case, then why isn't it OK to simply photograph and sell it?"

How does all this relate to the Catholic Church?

"The human sexuality disciples of Alfred Kinsey today counsel the Catholic Church," warned Dr. Reisman. "They train its children as future nuns, priests, brothers and bishops and they are Kinseyans, without question."

Kinsey disciple, Dr. Fred Berlin, from Johns Hopkins University, has been a major advisor to the to the Catholic Church since 1985, when he was identified as an expert in the treatment of pedophiles. Dr. Berlin was recommended to the National Council of Catholic Bishops ("NCCB") in a document known as the Peterson/Doyle Report, which has been cited as a warning of child sexual abuse by Catholic priests that was ignored by the NCCB.

The problem with the report is that it recommended the Bishops turn over all of their problem priests to sexual treatment centers, specifying Johns Hopkins, which was based entirely on the perverted and fraudulent treatment methods of Kinsey. While it is often said that the Bishops did not act on this report, it is clear that indeed they did send pedopriests to these centers for repair, or cures.

Both Dr. Berlin and Dr. John Money had been recommended to the Bishops by the authors of the Peterson/Doyle Report. (Peterson later died of died of AIDS.) Peterson wrote, "Drs. Money and Berlin are considered by me and most people the field as the two U.S. experts (and are) mental health professionals with good success in the treatment of such disorders." According to Dr. Reisman, Berlin and Money are peddling Kinsey's bogus sex science.

Dr. Berlin himself has stated publicly that he would not turn over predatory child molesters to the police. In fact, in1988 the Maryland press reported there were at least 8 men accused of sexually abusing children under the care of Dr. Berlin. "Dr. Berlin has served as a witness for sadistic sex offenders, and has testified in court that such men cannot control their sexual barbarism," observed Dr. Reisman. "But these deviants have no difficulty controlling their lust when they are in front of parents or legal authorities."

Dr. Reisman noted that, "Dr. John Money has written in the Journal of Paedophilia that sex between men and boys is a perfectly viable activity, it's really good for the boys, and he says he would never report a pedophile (to the police). This is the man in charge of training and curing priests!" Dr. Money also claimed that the Johns Hopkins clinic was not created to repair sex offenders but to give "lee-way for judges," as an alternative to jail.

In fact, Peterson's assessment of Money and Berlin's success was false. They had demonstrated no success in 'curing' child abusers. Another Johns Hopkins and Kinsey influenced 'expert' who impacts the Catholic Church is Dr. Paul McHue. Dr, McHue was appointed by United States Conference of Catholic Bishops ("USCCB") leader Bishop Wilton Gregory to the Catholic oversight board responsible for overseeing the implementation of various sexual abuse reforms. His role on the board is stated to have been to provide expert advice on the psychological treatment of clerics accused of sexually abusing children.

In a story critical of Johns Hopkins 'treatment' of pedophile priests, the Maryland press revealed that Dr. Berlin had been subverting the child abuse reporting required by state law with the full approval of his boss, Dr. Paul McHue. Dr. McHue was in charge of the treatment center at Johns Hopkins when Dr. Money was forcing boy patients at Johns Hopkins to engage in incestuous child pornography, which was revealed in the book As Nature Made Him, a book about trans-gendered operations performed at Johns Hopkins.

"I don't want to impugn the Bishops," said Dr. Reisman. "One of the reasons I focus on the Peterson /Doyle report is because I believe that document intentionally mislead the Catholic Church. This document told the Bishops to turn over all of their pederast priests to professionals…(The Peterson/Doyle Report) claimed they could cure the child abusing priests knowing they couldn’t. Whether Father Doyle understood this reality is another question. On the less generous side, just as we have closet pederasts in therapy profession, we have closet pederasts among the bishops. The problem is that these pederast bishops can influence other bishops and as a result, compromise the entire structure. In the end, there's simply no justification for Paul McHue being on an advisory board designed to curb child sexual abuse."

The Peterson/Doyle report also said, quoted Dr. Reisman, that, "the Catholic Church had to get away from its "extreme moral judgmentalism" and the only way was to transfer the sex offenders to specialized clinics, so they could be trained and repatriated. But you can’t very well train and repatriate a pederast priest if you believe that pederasty is OK, can you?"

Kinsey's influence on the Catholic Church is far deeper than the bogus treatment facilities responsible for recycling predator priests. The Kinsey Institute is the curator of the 'science' Kinsey created, and responsible for spreading it. To the extent that Kinsey's views on sex have been nearly universally accepted as truth, they have infiltrated public and private schools, and even been introduced into U.S. seminaries.

In his best selling book, Goodbye Good Men, author Michael Rose records the testimony of dozens of seminarians exposed to radical programs featuring hard core pornography while they were in the seminary. Remarkably, these programs continue in seminaries all over the world. Dr. Reisman contacted Rose after reading his book to make sure Rose was aware that these programs were products of the Kinsey Institute, and specifically, the Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) program. The SAR as shown in Kinsey training centers is a barrage of pornography on multiple screens, which is consistent with the programs described by shocked seminarians. In addition to seminarians, hundreds of orthodox priests who have been adjudged as "too rigid" have been forced to enter SAR programs at indoctrination centers across the country.

Just how has the Sexual Revolution spawned by Kinsey changed our culture? Dr. Reisman cited the statistics recently released by the U.S. Department of Justice. From 1976 to 1999 there has been a 1,311% increase in child sexual abuse. Roughly 400,000 children are prostituted annually in the United States. 67% of all reported sex abuse victims are children, and 34% of those children are under 12 years of age. 64% of all forced sodomy victims are boys under the age of 12 and age 4 is the most common age.

In 1999 the US Department of Justice reported 58,200 cases of non-family child abductions, two thirds reporting sexual abuse. 35% of these kidnappings were of boys, commonly abducted and sexually abused by homosexual men, who represent only 2% of the total population, according to Dr. Reisman.

Dr. Reisman concluded, "The ultimate source of the child sex abuse scandal in the Church can only be understood by studying Alfred Kinsey, the bisexual, pornographically obsessed pederast guru, and his disciples who currently counsel church and secular leaders."

For more information about Dr. Reisman, see www.drjudithreisman.org. To order a copy of Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, do so at the website or call, The Institute for Media Education at 1-800-476-0975.

Karl Maurer is the President of Aquinas Consulting, CPA's and Management Consultants, and is the Vice President of Catholic Citizens of Illinois (www.catholiccitizens.org). He may be reached at karl@aquinconsult.com.


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholicchurch; clericalabuse; michaeldobbs; sexabusescandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last
To: american colleen
I read the Bubbles defense of the Kinsey studies,Chancellor Palpatine or One Particular Harbor had posted something very much like it some time ago.It was a response to an article by the James Dobson group,Focus On Family.

The facts are that the Kinsey studies done on sexuality are difficult to validate or refute for people coming from our position since original research in the attempt would definitely be child abuse. Because of this,the reticence to perform sexual experimentation to prove or disprove whatever the other side is presenting as fact,we will always have to rely on the kind of data Dr. Reissman has presented. I believe it is irrefutable and that she has presented data to support her contentions that the studies were flawed due to the abnormal population from which the data was gathered and the findings generated.This is to say nothing of the lost files and other suspect machinations.

For example,how many times have we heard on the radio news that scientists had discovered a "gay" gene only to find that the study was on nine sets of twins or some such absurdity.

I am really rather out of sorts about this whole mess. I cannot imagine how this country has reached this point. To think that they allow sex education that talks about the alternate life style as being okay,while they teach children that cigarettes can kill and if your parents smoke maybe they don't love you enough to live for you. I just can't deal with the twisting of everything to suit their immediate desires.

Just like AIDS,the amount of money we spend on research and education and medical care is five to twenty times greater than for cancer or heart disease.and whose screaming about it,any of those politicians? No, they are just up there mouthing pithy platitudes and sloganeering and the public seems to be anesthetized to anything. I guess that's the main reason I am so disgusted with our bishops,they lost all of their moral authority and credibility,the fools.

Well,I just had a good thought,sometimes you have to hit rock bottom before you can start pulling yourself back up. Well,I think American society has hit rock bottom so I pray there is no place to go but up.Now if the son of the father,who is president doesn't get us involved with more foolishness maybe we can heal and use the gifts God bestowed on this country.Whew,I feel much better now.

141 posted on 01/06/2003 9:57:53 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
maryz.,I pinged you because a long time ago I told you that I had read the Doyle,Mouttan and Peterson report and thought it was confusing and also looked to me like they were marketing themselves to the Church. I commented that I could see why the bishops may not have paid much attention. Read what she writes,it seems that indeed they were both confusing and marketing.

Yes, I was thinking of your earlier post when I read what Reisman had to say about the report. (Doyle, however, seems to be dining out on his connection with the report -- nearly every newspaper story I see quotes him somewhere!)

I do recall a story that ran in the Boston Herald near the beginning of the scandal last year -- a psychologist (apparently a sane one) reviewed a textbook used in one of these "training/therapy" centers and said (quoting from memory), "My God! This is psychobabble -- it's a how-to manual for sex offenders!"

142 posted on 01/07/2003 9:47:56 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
the suit was dismissed without prejudice,which it says means she can not file again.

No. A suit dismissed without prejudice means it can be filed again. A matter dismissed with prejudice means it's over.

143 posted on 01/07/2003 11:11:54 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Just checked the link. the case was dismissed with prejudice. i would like to see the particulars of the original filing, and hear what Dr. Reisman and/or her attorney have to say about it.
144 posted on 01/07/2003 12:38:07 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Reisman filed suit in 1991 against The Kinsey Institute, then director June Reinisch, and Indiana University, alleging defamation of character and slander. In September 1993, Reisman's lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman's case with prejudice

Well, if you can find out what court it was filed in, it should be a matter of public record (around here -- Boston -- as far as I know, someone has to go over to the court and make copies of court papers they want). I wouldn't make too much of this -- she sued for defamation of character and slander, difficult to press for a public figure (OK, she's not a rock star, but she's published). And if the court didn't dismiss the suit until almost a year after her lawyer dropped out, it doesn't sound as if it was really moving right along. There may even have been some sort of settlement involved -- not necessarily cash, maybe an apology or something.

145 posted on 01/07/2003 1:51:13 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: maryz; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; american colleen
I am sorry for the incorrect info. I just knew she couldn't file again and was concerned. I hate to do things like that because it wastes so many people's time. Nonetheless there is nothing worse than a surprise when one is defending a cause. I am sure that it will amount to nothing yet to be forewarned is to be forearmed. Again,I apologise but I was just more interested in letting folks know there was an incident that needed more research.

Another poster, has promised to try to get all the information on the suit and let us know.

I wish I could link,but I cannot,maybe after I move. But speaking of being forearmed there is a great article on Saul Alinsky,if you go over to NewsMax and go to the bottom of the page the first columnist listed is Diane Alden.In the article listed under her name she has described how Alinskyites took over the Domocratic party. Mary and Colleen,that is how the Catholic Church came to this pass, Alinsky was great friends with Monsignor Jack Egan,a little Marxist in the Chicago diocese,who was close to Bernardin. He,Egan, using alinsky tactics ripped through Chicago parishes with all of the venom imaginable and practically destroyed the Church there. I think,Shanley,Geoghan and the street priests from the Paulists were doing the same thing in boston. I did read somewhere that they were heavy contributors to the Democratic Party.

While kind of on topic,several years ago I read a bood by G, Michael Jones called Cardinal Krol,it was about how these people ruined Philadelphia,neighborhood by neighborhood,parish by parish. Lots of good information applicable to every large urban area that was devastated. The little piece of information that I found most surprising was that the advance troops who bought in the neighborhoods targeted for destruction were Quakers.AC,the puzzle is slowly taking shape.

146 posted on 01/07/2003 3:03:25 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: maryz
So it was for defamation. Hard to make a case.
147 posted on 01/07/2003 3:05:41 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: maryz
i have seen similar settlements where the parties could not by agreement discuss the matter. This is fairly common in the area of the country in which i live. There might be a similar "gag order" here, hope not. Have to tell all of you though, the Kinsey site seemed to be jumping all around the issue, as well as the central contention that Kinsey's subjects were not representative of the general population.
148 posted on 01/07/2003 3:18:28 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
Thanks for the Newsmax reference -- I'll have to read it. That Diane Alden is excellent; I've seen a few of her articles (not nearly enough!).
149 posted on 01/08/2003 6:26:10 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Romulus; Maximilian; ninenot
Sorry I have been away from my computer for the past 3 weeks. Approx. a month ago I emailed my parish priest and Archbishop Dolan regarding my personal knowledge of the gay problems in the archdiocese...based on my work experience. I received a response from my pastor, but no response from the Archbishop, which rather surprised me. I know he is busy but some acknowledgement would have been nice. I know he comes with great credentials, and believe he was handpicked by the Pope, so I will give him a pass this time.
I will keep watch.
150 posted on 01/09/2003 4:50:07 PM PST by Litany
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Litany; boromeo; Coleus; saradippity; RobbyS; Aquinasfan; heyheyhey; maryz; Polycarp; NYer; ...
Just came across this new addendum to the Reisman saga. Pretty interesting to watch the developments on this front, especially now the the Vatican has been apprised.

Debunker of Kinsey's Report advises Catholic Church to sue "sex experts"

CHICAGO, Jan. 15, 03 - What if the "experts" who claimed that child molesting priests could be reformed and then repatriated to their parishes, weren't really experts at all? What if they were quack doctors, who believed there was fundamentally nothing wrong with adult/child sexually contact? What if their so-called treatments never showed success, and in fact were never intended to stop child sexual abuse?

This is the thesis of Dr. Judith Reisman, Ph. D., who believes that the entire field of sexology, established by the notorious Dr. Alfred Kinsey, is a fraud. Dr. Reisman also believes that the so-called treatments given to predator priests in Kinsey inspired therapy sessions were so grossly ineffective, that the Catholic Church and the victims of clerical sexual abuse have a legal claim against these sex clinics for medical malpractice. She is currently consulting with several attorneys regarding class action suits whereby the Catholic laity can seek damages.

Dr. Reisman, Ph.D. visited Chicago in November to discuss these issues and the second edition of her landmark book, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences at the invitation of Catholic Citizens of Illinois, a lay group founded in 1996 which offers a monthly luncheon and speaker forum open to the public.

After completing her doctorate studies in mass communication in 1980, Dr. Reisman entered an investigation into Dr. Kinsey . In 1998, she published the first edition of Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, which exposed Dr. Kinsey, for the first time, as an academic fraud and a bi/homosexual responsible for massive child molestation.

Dr. Reisman's investigation has revealed that the Institute for Sex Research at Indiana University ("IU"), led by Dr. Kinsey, was responsible for the criminal sexual abuse of over 300 infants and children, the results of which were published in Kinsey's 1948 report on male sexuality. Dr. Reisman also revealed that Kinsey's female 'research' subjects would have included large numbers of prostitutes, the only women willing to candidly discuss their sex lives with him. For his "normal" male subjects, Kinsey used prison inmates, where homosexuality was rampant.

Dr. Reisman noted that, "the members of the Catholic Church have a unique opportunity during this catastrophic challenge to help the entire nation to pull itself out of the very tragic place it has fallen into." In addition to a catastrophic loss of faith within the Church hierarchy, the hidden source of the current child sexual abuse scandal "is the constant stream of immorality in the media and popular culture that has polluted the nation and the Church. The main source of the sexual scandal today is Dr. Kinsey's sexual revolution."

Dr. Reisman pointed out that the media's use of the term ephebophilia to describe the abuse by priests is an intentionally misleading manipulation of language. "The main problem has been priests having sex with boys. Ephebophilia can by definition be heterosexual or homosexual assault. What we see today are almost exclusively homosexual assaults of boys, 'pederasty', and it has a long history. Ephebophilia has no validity in terms of what is taking place in the Catholic Church."

Dr. Reisman highlighted the recent statements of Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz, who has insisted, "questions should be asked about the clinics and treatment centers used by Bishops, and the faulty counsel by various kinds of sexologists, psychologists and other assorted 'experts' who advised recycling predatory priests."

In response to Bishop Bruskewitz's call, Dr. Reisman has developed a proposal mapping out the legal strategy for suing the "treatment centers" that accepted predatory priests fraudulently promising to rehabilitate them. The report was recently hand delivered to Pope John Paul II. "We have to face the fact," noted Dr. Reisman, "that just as there are closet pederast priests, and even Bishops, there are pederast therapists," and they have been misleading the Church for decades. As of this date, there has been no response from the Vatican regarding Dr. Reisman's proposals.

Dr. Reisman noted that legal precedence for culpability of therapists for fraudulent malpractice has already established by a $5.7 million award in 1984 against one such center, which had established a record for treating and releasing sexual predators who continued to prey on children after they had been allegedly "cured."

Referencing a growing mountain of evidence, Dr. Reisman declared it a well know fact that for decades parish school children, seminarians and priests in the Catholic Church have been counseled and taught using Kinsey's perverted and fraudulently derived theories of sexuality. In fact, "They (seminarians) have been taught the Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) process that was created at the Institute for the Study of Advanced Sexuality in San Francisco, which was founded by Dr. Wardell Pomeroy, Dr. Kinsey's one time lover. Pomeroy who not only endorsed wife-swapping and homosexuality, but has also extolled the virtues of child sex and even bestiality."

151 posted on 01/16/2003 7:59:40 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
Sexology has a lot in common with the astrology of the 16th Century, a mix of science and nonsense.
152 posted on 01/16/2003 8:15:36 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
. . . Catholic Church and the victims of clerical sexual abuse have a legal claim against these sex clinics for medical malpractice

I could be wrong, but my impression has been that many of those "clinics" were run by the Church in some form -- I mean, will this mean one diocese suing another or suing an Order that ran a clinic? Even for those clinics (if there were such) with no Church affiliation, I think way too many in authority in the Church were way too eager to spread that codswallop for the Church as an institution to have anything like "clean hands" for legal purposes.

153 posted on 01/16/2003 10:52:05 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: maryz; american colleen; BlackElk
Codswallop is a wonderful word,I have a feeling that I am going to overuse it because it so accurately captures the the quality of most of the work that is promulgated by the USCCB.Thankyou mary!!!

I believe you are correct in attributing many connections between bishops and sex clinics.In my estimation,this is all the more reason we should encourage Dr.Judith Reissman to pursue this lawsuit. It seems to me,as this scandal goes on and on that there was a deliberate intent to destroy the Catholic Church that was contrived by secular humanists outside of the Church,marxists and "progressives" both within and outside of the Church and quite a few bishops and priests within the Church.

I think,that at this point,the "planners" expected the steady drumbeat of measures they wanted taken to have moved Rome to act.Their dream to relax the celibacy requirement,allow women in the priesthood and democratize the Church is not coming easily,as they had hoped. In fact,the scandal has focused attention on homosexuality,a subject that they absolutely do not want to look at.

Certainly we can see that many of the power player USCCB bishops and bureaucracy are not taking the initiative and acting.They are just keeping quiet and waiting for it to blow over,a groundswell of support for law suits where they would have to testify is just what they deserve.

One,ordinarily very holy and kind Catholic poster on another thread finally said "you can't kill what you can't see". Dr. Reissman,bless her,has come up with another way to "smoke 'em out". Whether it goes anywhere or not,the thought should send chills up a lot of bishops spines and if we can do nothing else,we can hope that they are scared silly and very uncomfortable. Yes,they need to pursue a lawsuit against the sexologists and their clinics.Now that that the Church has captured the attention of American society,let it serve to shine a light on the seamy,deadly side of homosexuality.

154 posted on 01/16/2003 9:26:20 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson