Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do babies go to Heaven?

Posted on 12/29/2002 9:23:52 PM PST by PFKEY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2002 9:23:52 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
Do babies go to Heaven?

Who does, if they don't?

Matthew 19:13-14
Children were brought to him that he might lay his hands on them and pray. The disciples rebuked them, but Jesus said, "Let the children come to me, and do not prevent them; for the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to such as these."

2 posted on 12/29/2002 9:53:45 PM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
I know this passage well and believe that Heaven does indeed belong to them.
3 posted on 12/29/2002 9:56:53 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
And another one...
Matthew 18:1-5
The disciples approached Jesus and said, "Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?" He called a child over, placed it in their midst, and said, "Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me.
I hope this answers your question :-D
4 posted on 12/29/2002 10:00:17 PM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
Yes it does because I believe these passages to be true. The questions I had come up with regarding this had to do with people who believe in the 'elect' or the 144K or those that believe in original sin. Those sorta doctrines might be hard to reconcile with this belief. I have not heard this issue addressed in those terms and I am curious. Seeing we have so many Freepers of various faiths I thought this would be a great place to get an idea of what others believe.
5 posted on 12/29/2002 10:06:56 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
On the surface your question seems simple, but it is maybe more complex than one quickly realizes. Please read 2 Samuel 12:1-23 about the son that was born to David out of his adulterous affair/marriage with Bathsheba. The son died of an illness as an infant. David, who we know made it to heaven said in v23 "I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me." It appears that scripture supports infants going to heaven.

Note additionally that the "144k" of Revelation are followed by:

After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands; Revelation 7:9.

His mercy endures forever, Amen.

6 posted on 12/30/2002 12:26:32 AM PST by kickme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
It used to be, that Catholics believed that unbaptised infants could not go to heaven. Therefore, in the case of a risky birth, the infant was baptised during the labour. St Francis Xavier, when travelling in Japan, lamented when a young boy died that he could not enter heaven, as he had not yet been baptised. The souls of unbaptised infants, it was said, went to "limbo". Presumably, this doctrine of limbo was developed because it seems so unjust that they should be in hell.

But that is a view of former centuries, and in the 20th century, most people in the church came to believe that all innocent beings could enter heaven.
7 posted on 12/30/2002 1:19:30 AM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil; PFKEY
Presumably, this doctrine of limbo was developed because it seems so unjust that they should be in hell.

Limbo has never been a doctrine of the Church, it was a theological theory put forth by St. Augustine. The basis of his theory was an infant who dies unbaptized would have the stain of original sin on their soul. The official position of the Church is we trust these children to the mercy of God.

8 posted on 12/30/2002 5:04:36 AM PST by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
**I hope this answers your question**

From the Catholic Church point of view!
9 posted on 12/30/2002 6:52:14 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
A search of the Cathechism of the Catholic Church for "newborn" brought up these two references:

1-2 records returned of 2 matching NEWBORN .

24. "By design, this Catechism does not set out to provide the adaptation of doctrinal presentations and catechetical methods required by the differences of culture, age, spiritual maturity, and social and ecclesial condition among all those to whom it is addressed. Such indispensable adaptations are the responsibility of particular catechisms and, even more, of those who instruct the faithful:
Whoever teaches must become 'all things to all men' [1 Cor 9:22], to win everyone to Christ. . . Above all, teachers must not imagine that a single kind of soul has been entrusted to them, and that consequently it is lawful to teach and form equally all the faithful in true piety with one and the same method! Let them realize that some are in Christ as NEWBORN babes, others as adolescents, and still others as adults in full command of their powers.... Those who are called to the ministry of preaching must suit their words to the maturity and understanding of their hearers, as they hand on the teaching of the mysteries of faith and the rules of moral conduct.[Roman Catechism, Preface II; cf. ; .]"
To view the context, please visit

2271. "Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion.
This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.
Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:
You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the NEWBORN to perish.[Didache 2, 2: SCh 248, 148; cf. Ep. Barnabae 19, 5: PG 2, 777; Ad Diognetum 5, 6: PG 2, 1173; Tertullian, Apol. 9: PL 1, 319-320.]
God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves.
Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.[GS 51 # 3.] "

10 posted on 12/30/2002 7:00:41 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
It is a "De Fide" teaching of the Catholic Church that anyone who has the stain of original sin cannot enjoy the beatific vision. The theological debate over the centuries has been about what state the soul of an infant dying with original sin rests in. The prevailing view is that these souls will enjoy perfect happiness even though they do not enjoy the beatific vision.
11 posted on 12/30/2002 8:42:17 AM PST by Bellarmine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY; kickme
I really don't know how you can drag 144k into the subject of whether babies go to heaven. I see nothing in those verses in REV. indicateing babies.
12 posted on 12/30/2002 10:30:09 PM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
I believe that they do. I think along with the situation already mentioned regarding David and his baby who died, that certain key verses in Romans would apply.

Especially those regarding the knowledge of the law, or lack thereof.

Romans 3:20  Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Romans 5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

Romans 7:7  ¶What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law ...
13 posted on 12/30/2002 10:53:57 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY

TRAMPLING THROUGH THE TULIPS

      Here is the one verse Calvinism killer:
Mat 25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the DEVIL and his angels:

      NOBODY was predestinated for hell, it wasn't even created for people. It was prepared for the devil and his angels.

      Predestination is not for salvation, it is what already saved people are predestinated to.
Rom 8:29-30 For whom he did FOREKNOW, he also did predestinate TO BE conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

      Not only was the predestination predicated on God's foreknowledge (He KNEW it would happen but didn't MAKE it happen), but it wasn't salvation at al, it was the CONFORMING, et al, that was predestinated for those who were already saved.
Eph 1:5 Having predestinated US UNTO the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

      It's US (the saved) who are predestinated, UNTO the adoption.
Eph 1:11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:

      Here it's the inheritance, and these are the only places any form of the word "predestinate" appear in scripture.

TULIP

TOTAL DEPRAVITY

      Man is depraved, but not totally. Otherwise no one would ever give to disabled vets. Every man who crossed paths with your wife would try to rape her.

      Certainly the will is not hindered, God unquestionably gave man a free will.
Mark 8:34 And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, WHOSOEVER WILL COME after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Rev 22:17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And WHOSOEVER WILL, let him take the water of life freely.

UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION

      B. R. Lakin said that, "I believe in election. God voted for me, the devil voted against me, and now it's up to me to cast the deciding ballot!" Amen!

      This is very similar to irresistible grace below, and is refuted by the same scriptures.

LIMITED ATONEMENT

      The preposterous blasphemy that Jesus didn't die for everyone.
1 Tim 4:10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of ALL men, specially of those that believe.

      Believers are set apart from "all men". Jesus died for ALL MEN, not just the elect, but SPECIALLY for them.
1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the WHOLE WORLD.

      That covers just about everybody (unless there's a spaceflight in progress perhaps).

IRRESISTIBLE GRACE

      Anyone who sins knows that they can resist God. Either that, or God MAKES you sin, then it's not your fault and you couldn't be justly condemned.
Acts 7:51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always RESIST the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.
Lev 1:3 If his offering be a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male without blemish: he shall offer it of his OWN VOLUNTARY WILL at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the LORD.
Mat 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and YE WOULD NOT!

PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS

      When taught as eternal security, this is true. However, that's PRESERVATION (by God), not perseverance (by man). Many Calvinists believe that they must hold out to the end or they're not really one of the elect. That is actually the reverse of eternal security. Other Calvinists believe that this is a promise that God won't let an elect person die before he can get saved.

      Here's a real song sung by Calvinists, documented in Dr. Laurence Vance's book, "The Other Side of Calvinism":

      Can you imagine a Christian singing and rejoicing to such horrible lyrics? This one is much better,

      "WHOSOEVER WILL ... may come!"


Teno Groppi

14 posted on 12/30/2002 10:59:45 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY; heyheyhey; RnMomof7
I personally can't see babies going to heaven if they die unless they were chosen from the beginning. I think the question is a red herring question that keeps cropping up in our culture, because we really can't see the sin nature in babies. Our concept of sin is based generally on works related things that we can see. When in reality, God looks beyond what we can see and sees the heart. And if you look hard enough you see that the Bible says we are born with a sinful heart, we inherit the sinful heart of Adam. We are born with it. So saying that with out any scriptural support at this moment. I'll say why should God judge babies any differently, they too have a sinful heart too. Just because they look cute doesn’t mean they are without sin. Mice are cute too, but that doesn’t mean we love them and cuddle them too. No we try to kill them too in our mousetraps. Well anyway I’m getting away from making my comments on the verses mentioned.
Matthew 19:13-14 Children were brought to him that he might lay his hands on them and pray. The disciples rebuked them, but Jesus said, "Let the children come to me, and do not prevent them; for the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to such as these."

The miss interruptions I see most people making is they interrupt the verse to say as these and ignore the such. To rephrase the verse it might be easier to understand the verse if we said "like these", but I really don't think it would make much different in a culture that has already predetermined in their mind that babies go to heaven. We think of Babies going to hell as something ungodly of God, even though they are not any better then grownups as far as the heart goes. Remember the heart is what condemms us, not our works, because our works are dependent on our heart. That why Jesus says some where else in scripture I never knew you,(basically I never knew your heart). God the father never gave me your guys heart to change.

The other verse mentioned

Matthew 18:1-5 The disciples approached Jesus and said, "Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?" He called a child over, placed it in their midst, and said, "Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me.

The emphasis should be on the you and whoever not the Children. In other wise you should be as_______(fill in the blank) Children. I think Jesus is referring to the simplicity of a childs faith.

Again like I said at the beginning of my rant, I believe the question: “do babies go to heaven if they die? Is a red herring that Arminianists ask. I do believe if they really understood scripture they won’t be asking this question. The Arminianists spend to much time worshipping their babies instead of God. The only reason we should be having babies is because God instructed us as humans to go forth and populate the earth. Any other reason other then a reason that God gave us would be in sin. So I guess you can say a lot of babies are conceived out of sin since only about 50% or less are planned. But then again God doesn’t look at the works we do but at the heart. But not only is the idea that less 50% are conceived but that most women and some men want babies so that they can have something cuddly and cute. It’s like their ornament they put up on their tree of life to show others because that’s what is expected of them in their culture.

Well I’ve ranted and raved to much on this thread, I will bump it to Rnmomof7 to see if she wants to bump it to others, and I probably won’t response to any responses, but you can try to hook me though. I wasn’t planning on even getting this involved on any thread this week but you know they are contagious.

There are differing opinions on this subject within the Reform camp, most of them revolve around the verse in 2 Samuel 12:1-23 which I have no position on. I find it hard to take a position on just one verse or series of verses and like I said, I think you ought to be asking other questions in life concerning Scripture stuff, the depravity of the heart is a good starter.

15 posted on 12/30/2002 11:48:59 PM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jael
Well it looks like a new Arminianist has found this forum.
16 posted on 12/30/2002 11:53:31 PM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ReformedBeckite
Arminianist

No, just a Bible Believer. :-)

17 posted on 12/31/2002 8:44:22 AM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jael
Most be reading a different Bible
18 posted on 12/31/2002 8:47:40 AM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ReformedBeckite
Same one as always. the AV, King of Books!

It's very interesting, all means all in my Bible!!!

It's also got that inclusive language, whosoever will.

Revelation 22:17  And the Spirit and the bride say,
Come. And let him that heareth say, Come.
And let him that is athirst come.
And whosoever will,
let him take the water of life freely.

19 posted on 12/31/2002 9:22:42 AM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ReformedBeckite
I personally can't see babies going to heaven if they die unless they were chosen from the beginning.

I have a question for you, if you don't mind.

I think your argument falls flat here, with your comment above.

How can it be that anyone is saved, or born again, who doesn't believe? Are you assigning salvation to nothing more than God picking them?

It's a contradiction, do you see?

You are saying they would have to go to Hell because of their sin nature, yet the same would remain in place were they not born again.

Unless of course you consider Romans, where Paul says without the knowledge of the law, sin is not imputed.

But you don't consider that.

Thanks in advance for your reply.

20 posted on 12/31/2002 9:32:09 AM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson