Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PFKEY
It used to be, that Catholics believed that unbaptised infants could not go to heaven. Therefore, in the case of a risky birth, the infant was baptised during the labour. St Francis Xavier, when travelling in Japan, lamented when a young boy died that he could not enter heaven, as he had not yet been baptised. The souls of unbaptised infants, it was said, went to "limbo". Presumably, this doctrine of limbo was developed because it seems so unjust that they should be in hell.

But that is a view of former centuries, and in the 20th century, most people in the church came to believe that all innocent beings could enter heaven.
7 posted on 12/30/2002 1:19:30 AM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BlackVeil; PFKEY
Presumably, this doctrine of limbo was developed because it seems so unjust that they should be in hell.

Limbo has never been a doctrine of the Church, it was a theological theory put forth by St. Augustine. The basis of his theory was an infant who dies unbaptized would have the stain of original sin on their soul. The official position of the Church is we trust these children to the mercy of God.

8 posted on 12/30/2002 5:04:36 AM PST by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: BlackVeil
And babies are innocent before a perfect and holy God?
47 posted on 12/31/2002 1:23:22 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: BlackVeil
Presumably, this doctrine of limbo was developed because it seems so unjust that they should be in hell.

It was never accepted doctrine, just theological theory.

918 posted on 01/13/2003 7:02:22 AM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson