Skip to comments.
Cordial Discussion (P-Marlowe and pseudogratix)
COMMENTS BY OBSERVERS.
Posted on 12/21/2002 7:10:11 AM PST by drstevej
This thread is for COMMENTS on the "Cordial Discussion between P-Marlowe and Pseudogratix."
Please do not clutter the original discussion thread.
TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: kneadno; steekinkeywords; wedont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 621-629 next last
To: drstevej
What this? :<O
To: restornu
rotate it 90 degrees clockwise.
or.. lean your head over on your left shoulder..........
562
posted on
12/30/2002 4:36:00 PM PST
by
Elsie
To: drstevej
Cloning?
Spirit babies?
HMmmm...............
563
posted on
12/30/2002 4:36:52 PM PST
by
Elsie
To: drstevej
***Did I state the first to your satisfaction? [Yep.] Can you accept that we believe the second, without being forced to believe it yourself? [Yep.] Can you also accept that we are using Bible verses to support our belief, even if you disagree with the conclusion? [Nope, see above[below]
. You are misusing the Bible and abusing the Bible itself.] Hey, we are making good progress. Thanks for the agreements.
Let's talk about the third issue.
But LDS place the BoM, PGP, D&C in principle on a par with Scripture and in practice ahead of the Bible. This is a whole different matter than the answer to prayers or whether 2+2=4. At the same time they say the Bible is the Word of God as far as the KJV is translated accurately. Then they argue that since we don't have the original manuscripts we can not know if any of it is translated accurately. See, TPP, I find in reality anything in the Bible can be swept aside by LDS folk yet the BoM and PGP & D&C are guaranteed by Joe & Brigham's prophetic office. This is not a biblical religion in reality. It only appears to be such to the LDS believer and the naive.
I agree with you that LDS use the BoM, PGP, and D&C on a par with (and in many ways ahead of) the Bible. But that is not the question on the table right now.
This is: using the Bible, and only the Bible, would you agree with the premise at hand - that I have pointed out several passages that could support the concept of the Holy Spirit using a burning heart/bosom to testify of truth?
We LDS would certainly point out that our other scriptures can clarify the issue, and the passage in D&C 9 does this, as well as Moroni 10:5. And I would understand your objection if I did bring that into the discussion, considering the objection noted above. However, I am not using these other sources. All I doing is using the Bible.
I think these last questions are really the issue: What if an "accepted" Christian presented this idea? Would it be handled differently? Is the real problem here the fact that it is a LDS that is asking?
And if that is the case, what does that say about any of our other discussion threads on LDS issues?
To: restornu; drstevej; T. P. Pole
Have you tried praying over the Qu'ran or the Bahagadavita? How about the Apocrypha? The Egyptian Book of the Dead? How about praying over the Satanic Bible? Did you try that?
To: Elsie
or.. lean your head over on your left shoulder.......... :)
To: P-Marlowe
Have you tried praying over the Qu'ran or the Bahagadavita? How about the Apocrypha? The Egyptian Book of the Dead? How about praying over the Satanic Bible? Did you try that? Egyptian Book of the Dead? You crack me up.
I'll pretend that you don't already know our response to this.
We believe in the power of discernment. We can discern for ourselves that which is worthy of study.
To: P-Marlowe
BTW, I am serious about that being funny. I don't mind humor on these threads, as long as it is respectful. Just in case my comment looked sarcastic...
To: T. P. Pole
***to testify of truth?***
Define your phrase. And then show how Luke 14 meets this definition. I grant illumination in the case of the disciples. I don't see where this verse even establishes the norm for illumination much less the LDS doctrine of the BB.
***What if an "accepted" Christian presented this idea?***
Any Christian that used a burning bosom to declare the canon needed expansion, especially one who had visions of personages and golden plates and a seer stone (AND THESE ARE THE CASE with JS), I would reject as a fraud. I don't care if his name were Chuck Swindol or Rael.
To: P-Marlowe
I prayed over roast guinea pig served to me in Ecuador, and later my bosom didst burn.
Maybe I ate a canonical guinea pig. You think?
To: P-Marlowe
Have you tried praying over the Qu'ran or the Bahagadavita? How about the Apocrypha? The Egyptian Book of the Dead? How about praying over the Satanic Bible? Did you try that?***
PM still delivering Sourgrapes!
To: drstevej
"Gopher, Everett?"
--Delmar in OB,WAT?
572
posted on
12/30/2002 5:33:32 PM PST
by
Elsie
To: restornu
+
=
BURNIN' BOSOM
To: Elsie
I thought you was a 'toad.
To: restornu
That's TURNING your head left!
(I'll admit that MY head was turned!)
575
posted on
12/30/2002 5:34:47 PM PST
by
Elsie
To: drstevej
WHAT?
576
posted on
12/30/2002 5:35:31 PM PST
by
Elsie
To: drstevej
To: Elsie
"No thanks, Delbert. Half a gopher would only arouse my appetite without beddin' it back down."
To: restornu
I like Chuck. He's a nice guy.
BTW, he doesn't have a seer stone like TPJS, SBUHN. He does have a Harley.
To: drstevej
To bad there was no one around to tell JS,
"Do NOT - Seek -the Treasure!"
580
posted on
12/30/2002 5:39:55 PM PST
by
Elsie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 621-629 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson