Coming soon: Tha SYNDICATE.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.
Posted on 11/18/2002 8:04:41 AM PST by american colleen
Afraid You’ll be Left Behind? The Rapture Trap.
In 1980, I was 13 years old, and someone had given me a copy of Hal Lindsey's mega-selling The Late Great Planet Earth to read. The Soviets were in Afghanistan, the American hostages were in Tehran, I had become fixated on the fear of nuclear war and — suddenly, thanks to Late Great, the chaos all made sense. There was no need to be afraid. This was all part of God's plan. Accept Jesus as your personal savior, and you wouldn't have to suffer through the worst of what was to come, for you would be spirited away in the Rapture. And if you didn't — well, too bad for you when the Antichrist comes knocking.
The premillenial Rapture is the belief, held by many Protestant Christians, that believers will, "in the twinkling of an eye," be taken body and soul into heaven to meet Jesus Christ — this, just as the world is on the brink of seven years of unprecedented suffering and strife, preceding the Second Coming and the end of history. If you think the end of the world is upon us, it's easy to see why believing you won't have to suffer the worst of it would be calming. On the other hand, you might exchange one set of fears for another. When I was in Late Great's grip, I would wake up every morning in a mild state of panic, wondering if the Rapture had happened while you were sleeping, and I'd been … left behind!
I don't believe in the premillenial Rapture anymore, but it's easy to see why so many people want to. For Christians and others whose religious beliefs predict an apocalyptic final act (even Islam and the New Age have their own versions), these days are unusually anxious. It isn't difficult to find in today's headlines — wars, rumors of wars, natural disasters, plagues, religious strife and technology run amok — evidence for the belief that history is quickening toward some sort of climax.
No wonder, then, that the same sensational theological teachings that excited believers in the 1970s and earlier are more popular than ever. The Left Behind fiction series, whose title refers to those who weren't raptured before the Apocalypse, may well be the best-selling Christian books of all time, not counting the Bible.
Given the amount of popular publicity given to the Rapture and its attendant doctrines, it may surprise (and disappoint) many Christians to learn that this set of beliefs, generally called "dispensationalism," is not explicitly taught by the Bible, nor has ever been widely held by Christians.
In fact, neither Roman Catholicism nor Eastern Orthodoxy, which together include most of the world's Christians who live now and who have ever lived, profess dispensationalist eschatology (which means the study of the End Times). The Rapture is also alien to the historical Protestant confessions (as this story from a Baptist newspaper makes clear). Martin Luther had never heard of such a thing, nor had John Calvin, Ulrich Zwingli, or any other Protestant divine until a pair of 19th-century British small-sect pastors developed the notion apparently independent of each other. One of the men, John Nelson Darby, traveled widely in North America between 1859 and 1874, where his dispensationalist teachings spread like wildfire. (For a more detailed explanation of this theology from a dispensationalist viewpoint, go here and here)
Given world events, particularly in the Middle East and Europe, the dispensationalist fire continues to roar among Christians, who understandably want to know if today's headlines can be explained and tomorrow's headlines can be predicted from ancient Scripture. Unfortunately, many Christians are under the impression that dispensationalist teaching — on Christianity's theological fringe, historically speaking — is the first and last word on the matter. Most Catholic priests, as well as their mainline Protestant counterparts, downplay or ignore their congregations' natural — and sociologically predictable — interest in the End Times, leaving lay believers open to instruction by those who, however misguided, take it seriously. That's why Paul Thigpen, a Yale-trained religious historian and Catholic convert, wrote The Rapture Trap.
"I began to see so many Catholics taken in by this Left Behind stuff, because they've had no religious instruction in eschatology," Thigpen tells NRO. "In so many parishes the homilies are like, 'Love your neighbor, be nice.' If priests never get around to talking about who Jesus is, there's no way they're ever going to get around to talking about the Second Coming."
Though he writes from a Catholic perspective, Thigpen, an ex-Pentecostal and former editor of Charisma magazine, takes care to demonstrate in the book how none of the leaders of the Reformation believed in the Rapture. He says the "historical myopia" of American culture leaves people vulnerable to those who can exploit ignorance of the past with convincing presentations of vivid theologies. Besides, America has always been fertile ground for apocalyptic religion.
"In the early days, the Puritans thought the Kingdom of God would start in North America, in their colony," Thigpen says. "We have several large denominations in America, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses, who owe their existence to millennial fervor."
Eschatalogically-focused expressions of faith have swelled in popularity during times of social distress and dislocation, such as after the Civil War, and during the period of rapid industrialization and immigration. There was another great surge of it following World War II, says Thigpen, and again in the 1970s, as a reaction to countercultural upheaval. The dispensationalist apologetic The Late Great Planet Earth was the best-selling nonfiction book of the decade, and though he has never apologized for his erroneous predictions in that book, author Hal Lindsey continues to be considered by many an authority on Biblical prophecy. Being a dispensationalist evangelist means never having to say you're sorry.
Why should any of this matter? As I wrote this past summer, apocalyptic beliefs dictate the behavior of many true believers. American dispensationalists were early non-Jewish supporters of Zionism, believing that the ingathering of diaspora Jews to their Biblical homeland was a necessary precursor for the return of Christ. Though many Evangelicals and other Christians support Israel today for other reasons, no small number of them do so because their end-times belief mandates it. Thigpen is not so much worried that Rapture-expecting Christians will blow up Jerusalem's Dome of the Rock to hasten Armageddon as he is concerned about the spiritual harm that may result from acceptance of dispensationalist beliefs.
"When times look tough and threatening, perhaps people find a comfort in believing in the Rapture, that God will help them escape events before they become too bad," Thigpen says. "Ideas have consequences. One, the Rapture doctrine ignores the redemptive power of suffering, which is a powerful Christian theme. Two, the Bible also shows that God chastises His people as well as their enemies; believers share in suffering as well. Three, if people wrongly believe Christians won't be around for the persecution that Scripture tells us will precede the Second Coming, they won't prepare themselves spiritually or otherwise."
Just because Catholicism doesn't teach the Rapture or focus on end-times prophecy doesn't mean the Catholic world has escaped popular apocalypticism. The particularly Catholic version comes as a mania for apocalypse-centered apparitions and private revelations claimed by contemporary visionaries. The Rapture Trap writes of the spiritual danger of uncritically accepting such claims, and offers discernment guidelines drawn from Catholicism's conservative tradition.
"What we're dealing with are people who are scared and confused by what's going on in the world today, and who aren't getting the information they need to separate what's real from what's vain and even harmful speculation," Thigpen says. "As Christians, we believe Jesus is coming back, and we have to be ready for that to happen at any moment. But this game of 'plug the headline into the Scripture verse,' or into the latest message from a supposed apparition, is a losing proposition."
Coming soon: Tha SYNDICATE.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.
With all Christian respect: please, RnMom, don't flatter yourself. You certainly don't make me nuts. Although I believe that you are a sincere Christian and in general harbor no personal ill will towards people, I find your posts to be largely devoid of charity and a spirit of Christian fraternity. Your arguments, while presented with spirit and sincerity, are in general logically and hermaneutically weak and easy to refute-- certainly nothing to drive anyone "nuts". If anything in your posts drives certain people on FR "nuts", it's the sarcasm and self-righteous tone they display. Christians are not to speak to one another disrespecfully; we should work out our Faith in fear and trembling, yes, as St. Paul to St. Peter -- but contention and outright rancor are simply not allowed. They speak of a kind of pride that ought not to be even thought of within the Body of Christ, a spirit of superiority of one believer over another.
I'm sure in your mind you see yourself as one trying desparately to save us Catholics from "believing a lie" that could damn us all to Hell. If sincere, such a sentiment is most worthy, and I for one appreciate such a compassionate concern for the souls of others, however misguided. But I sense more than the desire to "save" us Catholics in your posts; I sense an intense hatred, a darkness, a spirit of anger directed at those outside your narrow personal interpretation of Holy Scripture. If we are indeed lost -- which I obviously do not believe -- would it not be more productive to simply pray for us? After all, you have made your doctrinal beliefs more than clear on this forum; you have obeyed the Master's command to "go forth" and bear witness to what you perceive to be Christian Truth. Your duty in that regard is done. Therefore, if you truly believe that we Catholics are hell-bound, the only thing left to do is commend us to God, and stop casting your pearls before swine.
As a former Protestant "bible Christian", I understand the impulse to "witness" to those who cannot see the "plain truth" of the Bible as perceived by the witness oneself. But there is nothing to be gained by angrily insisting that all those who do not share that "plain truth" are damned: such ranting comes off as silly to those who belong to the Faith of the Fathers (the Catholics and Orthodox) and as crazy to those outside the Fold of Christ. All the Gospel in the world will avail nothing if presented in the form of verbal frothing, snide comments, or judgemental pronouncements -- so avoid them. Instead, simply say what you have to say with charity, trust in God to find His every sheep (no matter how lost) through His own power, and move on.
To sum up: your presentation of the "bible Christian" position here has not been quite as effective as you might have imagined. Cut the rancor, argue to the case and not the opponent, and keep in mind that Christians aren't called to be the best debaters in the world ; we are called to be the most loving people in the world.
Yours in Christian fraternity,
B-chan
(sigh!) I did not 'insinuate' in my post that you claimed Polycarp is 'full of pride.' I stated he had a problem with it. I could do this because Polycarp himself had already stated as much. Guess what, so do I. So do most people. The difference is, some are mature enough to deal with it, and others make themselves look silly constantly trying to twist things so they can win some stupid argument on an internet thread.
LOL! Have you forgotten? I haven't. In fact, I would not exchange a word with the person who wrote the below words - are these words that make you proud to be a Calvinist?
...I regard you as a silly cannibal, not a real Christian....stubbornly superstitious religious dork.
...supposedly sublime, supposedly lovely doctrine of the Eucharist is actually quite ABSURD and quite MONSTROUS. Ah, but your demonic controller will never let you be reasonable about this stuff
...You spiritual idiots would rather go to hell than to admit that a Protestant is right in CONDEMNING your ASININE doctrine of the Eucharist.
...The Lord Jesus, the Truth Incarnate, was killed by reprobate religionists aligned with Rome, of course. And it is inarguably **true** that the RCC has murdered MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of Christians. What else should we expect from cannibals?
...Cannibals, cowards, liars, queers, murderers.
...I happen to be a saint. On the other hand, you are--to put it bluntly--Satanically screwed. The saddest thing about this is that it's your own fault.
...Papists had become a bunch of murdering, crooked swine, not Christians.
Is this what you are defending?
You are in about as good a spiritual condition a dead man can be in
Luk 8:8 And other fell on good ground, and sprang up, and bare fruit an hundredfold. And when he had said these things, he cried, He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
Luk 8:9 And his disciples asked him, saying, What might this parable be?
Luk 8:10 And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
Amen Amen..toe the line or out the door..make a sign of the cross on the way out sister
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.