Any evidence against it-none!
[b] the enemies of God who stay home on "The Day of the Lord" will not be killed --
No, what was said, it that not everyone is part of the military that is destroyed (common sense, but we are dealing with Amill's here)
[c] even though they're not goats, the sheep will also be ruled over with a rod of iron --
Children will be born to the 'sheep'who will not obedient and have to ruled with a rod of iron.
[d] the Father has a Bride (Isreal) and the Son has a Bride (the Church) which answers the sticky problem of Christ being a bigomist otherwise
It sure does answer the non-problem that the Amill's made up.
Did you ever answer the question about the Fall of Jerusalem being the greatest diaster for the Jews that ever happened according to Matthew 24?
To make better sense of this, substitute the word "principal" for the word "interest", and it reads: ". . . at my coming, I would have received the interest [mine own] along with the principal". Jesus distinguishes the interest which is His in particular from the principal which belongs to the God of Israel..
In financial terms, the principal is the mother that gives birth to the interest which is the offspring [child]. The term "interest-bearing principal" is the mother bearing the child. The Israel of God is the mother that gives birth to the Body of Christ, the interest from God's investment in the nation of Israel in the OT.
That being said, what investment banker would throw out the principal and keep only the interest, or what father would discard the mother after she gave birth to her child. So it is with those who adhere to replacement theology. They would throw the mother out with the bathwater.