Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spurgeon's View of the MILLENNIUM
Pilgrim Pub. ^ | MARK A. MCNEIL

Posted on 09/12/2002 7:19:20 AM PDT by xzins


CONFUSED ABOUT SPURGEON'S PROPHETIC VIEWS?

WELL, NO LONGER!  HERE IS...

.

Charles

Haddon

Spurgeon's

VIEW OF THE

MILLENNIUM

 Annotated Summary by  

MARK A. MCNEIL

"I am not now going into millennial theories, or into any speculation as to dates. I do not know anything at all about such things, and I am not sure that I am called to spend my time in such researches. I am rather called to minister the gospel than to open prophecy. Those who are wise in such things doubtless prize their wisdom, but I have not the time to acquire it, nor any inclination to leave soul-winning pursuits for less arousing themes. I believe it is a great deal better to leave many of these promises, and many of these gracious out-looks of believers, to exercise their full force upon our minds, without depriving them of their simple glory by aiming to discover dates and figures. Let this be settled, however, that if there be meaning in words, Israel is yet to be restored. Israel is to have a SPIRITUAL RESTORATION or a CONVERSION."

[from The Restoration & Conversion of the Jews MTP Vol 10, Year 1864, pg. 429, Ezekiel 37:1-10 (age 30)]

INTRODUCTION

There has been some considerable difference of opinion regarding the position that C. H. Spurgeon, the great Baptist preacher from the 19th century, held in the area of Eschatology regarding the doctrine of the Millennium. Each of the three major divisions within this area of doctrine have proponents who claim Spurgeon as one of their own. Many times authors claim a different millennial view than what Spurgeon actually believed.

It is not our task to sort out the arguments for each view. Such an assignment would take a very large volume (many are available) and the issue would still not be solved for all. We would simply like to define the basic positions and then demonstrate from Spurgeon's own words which one view he held.

PREMILLENNIALISM

The first view regarding the Millennium is that of PREMILLENNIALISM. The prefix, "Pre," denotes "before." The prefix is telling us at what point in relationship to the millennium that Christ will come. This view holds that our Lord will Literally return before a 1,000-year reign of Christ begins. The millennium of Revelation 20 is taken to be literal. If not literal, it at least is speaking of an indefinite period of time following the coming of Christ during which there will be perfect peace on the earth.

Within the premillennialist camp, there have come to be two identifiable views: the "dispensationalist" position, and the "historic" position. For further information defending each of these views, one should consult Reese's The Approaching Advent of Christ [historic] and Dwight Pentecost's Things to Come [dispensational]. Though the differences between the two are important, it is not within the scope of our purpose here to delve into such matters.

AMILLENNIALISM

The second view is called AMILLENNIALISM, or sometimes called "realized eschatology". The prefix, "A-," means "no". This would suggest that those who hold this view do not believe in a millennium. This is somewhat misleading, however. This view is the the product of a consistent Spiritual interpretation of prophetic literature. To those, the millennium is not some future physical reign, but the present reign of Christ in the hearts of believers. The "millennium" is an indefinite period of time (the present age) after which Christ will physically return. Prophecy in the Church, by Oswald Allis, is a standard work for the amillennial position.

This is the position of the Roman Catholic Church, also many other Protestant denominations. It grew out of St. Augustine's spiritualizing of these issues in his writings, and the tendency of many early Christian writers to see the Church as the "new Israel" and therefore the recipient of the promises of the Old Testament for the Jewish nation. Those who hold this view do not speak of the millennium as a future happening.  It is, to them, a Present Reality.

POSTMILLENNIALISM

The third, and last, major view is that of POSTMILLENNIALISM. The prefix "Post" speaks of "after." This teaching promotes the view that the physical return of Christ will Follow an actual millennium. The influence of Christianity will over-take the world for an extended period of time, then Christ will return.

This view appears to be a mixture of the principles that work to produce the first two views. It is not consistently spiritual or literal in its interpretation of the prophetic material relevant to this issue. Perhaps the foremost writing for this position today is The Millennium, by Loraine Boettner.

Spurgeon's VIEW  

With basic definitions before us, then, let's look at some quotes from Spurgeon to see what his position was on the Millennium.

"If I read the word aright, and it is honest to admit that there is much room for difference of opinion here, the day will come, when the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven with a shout, with the trump of the archangel and the voice of God. Some think that this descent of the Lord will be Post-millennial that is, 'after the thousand years' of his reign. I CANNOT THINK SO. I conceive that the advent will be PRE-millennial that He will come first; and then will come the millennium as the result of his personal reign upon earth. But whether or no, this much is the fact, that Christ will suddenly come, come to reign, and come to judge the earth in righteousness." [from Justification & Glory MTP Vol 11, Year 1865, pg. 249, Romans 8:30 (age 31)]

Spurgeon here specifically identifies the Postmillennial view with a clear DENIAL of any adherence to it! Those who attempt to claim Spurgeon for this viewpoint do not demonstrate their contention by referring to clear comparisons such as this one. They rather go to sermons not specifically dealing with both positions and pull out of them ideas that are "compatible" with Postmillennial thinking. This is a faulty way of proving a point, however* especially when they meet squarely with a Spurgeon statement like the one above, and those below.

*NOTE: Furthur, a few postmillennialists (especially GARY NORTH), are guilty of misrepresenting Spurgeon constantly in articles and books; NORTH has repeatedly alleged that "Spurgeon was Postmillennial"yet neither his supplied quotations "say" so, and/or he deliberately does not present a statement by Spurgeon that North will speculate "implies" a Postmillennial position. Our advice is to ignore anything North states regarding Spurgeon's views and Prophecy!

Again, consider Spurgeon's View here in light of 'Postmillennial' teaching...

"Paul does not paint the future with rose-colour: he is no smooth-tongued prophet of a golden age, into which this dull earth may be imagined to be glowing. There are sanguine brethren who are looking forward to everything growing better and better and better, until, at last, this present age ripens into a millennium. They will not be able to sustain their hopes, for Scripture gives them no solid basis to rest upon. We who believe that there will be no millennial reign without the King, and who expect no rule of righteousness except from the appearing of the righteous Lord, are nearer the mark. Apart from the second Advent of our Lord, the world is more likely to sink into a pandemonium than to rise into a millennium. A divine interposition seems to me the hope set before us in Scripture, and, indeed, to be the only hope adequate to the occasion. We look to the darkening down of things; the state of mankind, however improved politically, may yet grow worse and worse spiritually." [from The Form of Godliness Without the Power MTP Vol 35, Year 1889, pg. 301, 2 Timothy 3:5 (age 54)]

"We are to expect the literal advent of Jesus Christ, for he himself by his angel told us, 'This same Jesus which is taken up from you into heaven shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven,' which must mean literally and in person. We expect a reigning Christ on earth; that seems to us to be very plain, and to be put so literally that we dare not spiritualise it. We anticipate a first and a second resurrection; a first resurrection of the righteous, and a second resurrection of the ungodly, who shall be judged, condemned, and punished for ever by the sentence of the great King." [from Things to Come MTP Vol 15, Year 1869, pg. 329, 1 Corinthians 3:22 (age 35)]

Here, stress is laid upon the Literal Nature of the second coming.  Also, after this literal return is stressed a reigning upon the earth.

"We have done once for all with the foolish ideas of certain of the early heretics, that Christ's appearance upon earth was but a phantom. We know that he was really, personally, and physically here on earth. But it is not quite so clear to some persons that he is to come really, personally, and literally, the second time. I know there are some who are labouring to get rid of the fact of a personal reign, but as I take it, the coming and the reign are so connected together, that we must have a spiritual coming if we are to have a spiritual reign. Now we believe and hold that Christ shall come a second time suddenly, to raise his saints at the first judgment, and they shall reign with him afterwards. The rest of the dead live not till after the thousand years are finished. Then shall they rise from their tombs at the sounding of the trumpet, and their judgment shall come and they shall receive the deeds which they have done in their bodies." [from The Two Advents of Christ MTP Vol 8, Year 1862, pg. 39, Hebrews 9:27-28 (age 28)]

[from The Sinner's End MTP Vol 8, Year 1862, pgs. 712-713, Psalms 73:17-18 (age 28)], Spurgeon is discussing the final condition of the sinner "Let us go on to consider their end. The day of days, that dreadful day has come. The millennial rest is over, the righteous have had their thousand years of glory upon earth."

In the quotes above, the order of events fits perfectly the PREmillennial point of view. The final end of the sinner is faced after the righteous have enjoyed a thousand years with Christ.

.

 

"Our Hope is the Personal

PRE-MILLENNIAL

RETURN of the

  Lord Jesus Christ in Glory."

August 1891, age 58  

Of the various articles and writings by those who deny the conclusion that we feel is obvious, none that I have found bases itself on the same type of quotes we have produced (many others could have been given see those that follow). To the contrary, their's are based on "interpreting" Spurgeon's statements apart from such quotes that we have given.

.

We feel safe in concluding, then,

that of the three views we began with,

Spurgeon expressly states that he believes in a

Literal Return of Jesus Christ

BEFORE

a Literal Millennium on the Earth.

———————————————————————————

.

Written by Mark A. McNeil (Houston TX USA), B.A., M.A., & PhD. Student

Author of An Evaluation of the 'Oneness Pentecostal' Movement

$3 + $1 shipping Published by Pilgrim Publications

also Read C. H. SPURGEON on "PRETERISM" <<< Click Link

  Join our company... Psalm 68:11 "The Lord gave the WORD:

Great was the COMPANY of those that PUBLISHED it."

Please, Copy this article, pass it on, and mail to others.

Permission granted by Bob L. Ross  No Copyright

NOTES OF INTEREST

Watching and Waiting Magazine

                                          by C. W. H. Griffiths

Published by Sovereign Grace Advent Testimony

1 Donald Way, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 9JB United Kingdom

Stephen A. Toms, secretary

Write and Request the Complete Article            

From the Summer 1990 issue of this magazine, C. W. H. Griffiths states Spurgeon "was a valued standard bearer for historic Pre-millennialism," and then presents an excellent article defending his Pre-millennial position.

Documenting additional quotations which we have added and expanded below

Spurgeon (age 43) There is moreover to be a reign of Christ. I cannot read the Scriptures without perceiving that there is to be a pre-millennial reign, as I believe, upon the earth and that there shall be new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness...

Spurgeon (age 49) Then all His people who are alive at the time of His coming shall be suddenly transformed, so as to be delivered from all the frailties and imperfections of their mortal bodies: The dead shall be raised incorruptible and we shall be changed. Then we shall be presented spirit, soul, and body without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; in the clear and absolute perfection of our sanctified manhood, presented unto Christ Himself.

Spurgeon (age 50) When the Lord comes there will be no more death; we who are alive and remain (as some of us may be we cannot tell) will undergo a sudden transformation for flesh and blood, as they are, cannot inherit the kingdom of God and by that transformation our bodies shall be made meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light.

Spurgeon (age 52) His coming will cause great sorrow. What does the text say about his coming? All kindreds of the earth shall wail because of Him. Then this sorrow will be very general.

Spurgeon (age 30) [from The Restoration & Conversion of the Jews MTP Vol 10, Year 1864, pgs. 427-430, Ezekiel  37:1-10] Under the preaching of the Word the vilest sinners can be reclaimed, the most stubborn wills can be subdued, the most unholy lives can be sanctified. When the holy "breath" comes from the four winds, when the divine Spirit descends to own the Word, then multitudes of sinners, as on Pentecost's hallowed day, stand up upon their feet, an exceeding great army, to praise the Lord their God. But, mark you, this is not the first and proper interpretation of the text; it is indeed nothing more than a very striking parallel case to the one before us. It is not the case itself; it is only a similar one, for the way in which God restores a nation is, practically, the way in which he restores an individual. The way in which Israel shall be saved is the same by which any one individual sinner shall be saved. It is not, however, the one case which the prophet is aiming at; he is looking at the vast mass of cases, the multitudes of instances to be found among the Jewish people, of gracious quickening, and holy resurrection. His first and primary intention was to speak of them, and though it is right and lawful to take a passage in its widest possible meaning, since "no Scripture is of private interpretation," yet I hold it to be treason to God's Word to neglect its primary meaning, and constantly to say "Such-and-such is the primary meaning, but it is of no consequence, and I shall use the words for another object." The preacher of God's truth should not give up the Holy Ghost's meaning; he should take care that he does not even put it in the back ground. The first meaning of a text, the Spirit's meaning, is that which would be brought out first, and though the rest may fairly spring out of it, yet the first sense should have the chief place. Let it have the uppermost place in the synagogue, let it be looked upon as at least not inferior, either in interest or importance, to any other meaning which may come out of the text.

The meaning of our text, as opened up by the context, is most evidently, if words mean anything, first, that there shall be a political restoration of the Jews to their own land and to their own nationality; and then, secondly, there is in the text, and in the context, a most plain declaration, that there shall be a spiritual restoration, a conversion in fact, of the tribes of Israel.

The promise is that they shall renounce their idols, and, behold, they have already done so. "Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols." Whatever faults the Jew may have besides, he certainly has no idolatry. "The Lord thy God is one God," is a truth far better conceived by the Jew than by any other man on earth except the Christian. Weaned for ever from the worship of all images, of whatever sort, the Jewish nation has now become infatuated with traditions or duped by philosophy. She is to have, however, instead of these delusions, a spiritual religion: she is to love her God. "They shall be my people, and I will be their God." The unseen but omnipotent Jehovah is to be worshipped in spirit and in truth by his ancient people; they are to come before him in his own appointed way, accepting the Mediator whom their sires rejected; coming into covenant relation with God, for so our text tells us "I will make a covenant of peace with them," and Jesus is our peace, therefore we gather that Jehovah shall enter into the covenant of grace with them, that covenant of which Christ is the federal head, the substance, and the surety. They are to walk in God's ordinances and statutes, and so exhibit the practical effects of being united to Christ who hath given them peace. All these promises certainly imply that the people of Israel are to be converted to God, and that this conversion is to be permanent, for the tabernacle of God is to be with them, the Most High is, in an especial manner, to have his sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore; so that whatever nations may apostatize and turn from the Lord in these latter days, the nation of Israel never can, for she shall be effectually and permanently converted, the hearts of the fathers shall be turned with the hearts of the children unto the Lord their God, and they shall be the people of God, world without end.

We look forward, then, for these two things. I am not going to theorize upon which of them will come first, whether they shall be restored first, and converted afterwards, or converted first, and then restored. They are to be restored, and they are to be converted too. Let the Lord send these blessings in his own order, and we shall be well content whichever way they shall come. We take this for our joy and our comfort, that this thing shall be, and that both in the spiritual and in the temporal throne, the King Messiah shall sit, and reign among his people gloriously.

Spurgeon (age 30) [from The Lamb the Light MTP Vol 10, Year 1864, pg. 439, Revelation 21:23] (Spurgeon says of the millennial earth), They shall not say one to another, "Know the Lord: for all shall know him, from the least to the greatest." There may be even in that period certain solemn assemblies and Sabbath-days, but they will not be of the same kind as we have now; for the whole earth will be a temple, every day will be a Sabbath, the avocations of men will all be priestly, they shall be a nation of priests distinctly so, and they shall day without night serve God in his temple, so that everything to which they set their hand shall be a part of the song which shall go up to the Most High. Oh! blessed day. Would God it had dawned, when these temples should be left, because the whole world should be a temple for God. But whatever may be the splendours of that day and truly here is a temptation to let our imagination revel however bright may be the walls set with chalcedony and amethyst, however splendid the gates which are of one pearl, whatever may be the magnificence set forth by the "streets of gold," this we know, that the sum and substance, the light and glory of the whole will be the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, "for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof." Now, I want the Christian to meditate over this. In the highest, holiest, and happiest era that shall ever dawn upon this poor earth, Christ is to be her light. When she puts on her wedding garments, and adorns herself as a bride is adorned with jewels, Christ is to be her glory and her beauty. There shall be no ear-rings in her ears made with other gold than that which cometh from his mine of love; there shall be no crown set upon her brow fashioned by any other hand than his hands of wisdom and of grace. She sits to reign, but it shall be upon his throne; she feeds, but it shall be upon his bread; she triumphs, but it shall be because of the might which ever belongs to him who is the Rock of Ages. Come then, Christian, contemplate for a moment thy beloved Lord. Jesus, in a millennial age, shall be the light and the glory of the city of the new Jerusalem. Observe then, that Jesus makes the light of the millennium, because his presence will be that which distinguishes that age from the present. That age is to be akin to paradise. Paradise God first made upon earth, and paradise God will last make. Satan destroyed it; and God will never have defeated his enemy until he has re-established paradise, until once again a new Eden shall bless the eyes of God's creatures. Now, the very glory and privilege of Eden I take to be not the river which flowed through it with its four branches, nor that it came from the land of Havilah which hath dust of gold I do not think the glory of Eden lay in its grassy walks, or in the boughs bending with luscious fruit but its glory lay in this, that the "Lord God walked in the garden in the cool of the day." Here was Adam's highest privilege, that he had companionship with the Most High. In those days angels sweetly sang that the tabernacle of God was with man, and that he did dwell amongst them. Brethren, the paradise which is to be regained for us will have this for its essential and distinguishing mark, that the Lord shall dwell amongst us. This is the name by which the city is to be called Jehovah Shammah, the Lord is there. It is true we have the presence of Christ in the Church now "Lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world." We have the promise of his constant indwelling: "Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." But still that is vicariously by his Spirit, but soon he is to be personally with us. That very man who once died upon Calvary is to live here. He that same Jesus who was taken up from us, shall come in like manner as he was taken up from the gazers of Galilee. Rejoice, rejoice, beloved, that he comes, actually and really comes; and this shall be the joy of that age, that he is among his saints, and dwelleth in them, with them, and talketh and walketh in their midst.

"If I read the word aright, and it is honest to admit that there is much room for difference of opinion here, the day will come, when the Lord Jesus will descend from heaven with a shout, with the trump of the archangel and the voice of God. Some think that this descent of the Lord will be Post-millennial that is, 'after the thousand years' of his reign. I CANNOT THINK SO. I conceive that the advent will be PRE-millennial that He will come first; and then will come the millennium as the result of his personal reign upon earth. But whether or no, this much is the fact, that Christ will suddenly come, come to reign, and come to judge the earth in righteousness." [from Justification & Glory MTP Vol 11, Year 1865, pg. 249, Romans 8:30 (age 31)]



TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: amillennialism; burnservetus; calburnbibles; calvinism; falsedoctrine; heritics; millenium; postmillennialism; premillennialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,861-1,8801,881-1,9001,901-1,920 ... 2,721-2,722 next last
To: the_doc
Rev 20:4   And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and [I saw] the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received [his] mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Actually, I would prefer to elaborate on the idea of beheading in this way: The death of Christ Himself was a kind of capital punishment of the Body of Christ. God's elect undergo this capital (beheading) experience one by one in the vicarious way of conversion.

That is a stretch doc...now I have been reading and listening...you guys have some points...BUT this one is over the top

There is only one verse in scripture using that greek word

3990 pelekizo {pel-ek-id'-zo} from a derivative of 4141 (meaning an axe);; v
AV - behead 1; 1
1) to cut off with an axe, to behead

Now that seems pretty clear to me

Notice John saw the souls not the bodies..that is one point for the amil side..but I read that as the martyrs like John the Baptist..Is there any scholarship on that?

1,881 posted on 09/26/2002 9:19:56 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1877 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
"..as Arthur Pink pointed out in his commentary on Hebrews, the death of Christ really was the capital (beheading) punishment of the entire Body."

I haven't read his commentary, but will definately make it a point to do so at my first opportunity. (Gotta head out to the courthouse right now to get some work done).

Bump for your post! And thanks for the reference!!!

1,882 posted on 09/26/2002 9:22:38 AM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1877 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Notice that only those who get to reign with Christ for the thousand years are those who are beheaded. Not those stoned or eaten by lions or sawed in two or any one else. Obviously the PreMill has a problem with this verse.
1,883 posted on 09/26/2002 9:44:51 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1881 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
No Mrs. Nice Gal from you, huh? Well, good. If you didn't abuse me, I'd think it was "toogood" to be Mom. LOL. :>)

1,884 posted on 09/26/2002 9:48:34 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1879 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
This is why I have stayed away from prophecy. I am going to do a word search on ax
1,885 posted on 09/26/2002 9:51:15 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
No -- it doesn't say "only" -- read it again.
1,886 posted on 09/26/2002 10:07:14 AM PDT by Woodkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Hey, it gets better for the PreMill. Only those who are beheaded get to reign with Christ and only those who reign are immune from the second death, or so the PreMill tell us. Thus, only those who get their head cut off will live forever.
1,887 posted on 09/26/2002 10:14:32 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1885 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
No Woody, you have Zechariah and the prophets as well but
to you they are merely ancient history ---- any time you
stand on one leg you are unstable and on the verge of falling.
1,888 posted on 09/26/2002 10:17:36 AM PDT by Woodkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1878 | View Replies]

To: Woodkirk
Well, there are those who get to sit on the thrones....
1,889 posted on 09/26/2002 10:18:53 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1886 | View Replies]

To: Woodkirk
Oh, yeah, I forgot, you are the one who declares to us that during the Millennial "Day" of the Lord the women will get to enjoy being raped and Jerusalem will be taken. Oh, yeah, I just can't wait to sign up for your brand of cult!
1,890 posted on 09/26/2002 10:21:30 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1888 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; the_doc; CCWoody; Jean Chauvin
Now I could live with this discription below...BUT I think that doc said (if I understood correctly) That the FR amils do not accept a duel kingdom idea..(if I understood correctly?? (post 1813) Most amills definitely do argue that the millennial reign of Christ and His saints is centered in HEAVEN while church history is developing on EARTH.
But FR's amills, as far as I can tell, do not make a separation between these ideas even if we distinguish between them.

"Study scripture carefully leaning upon it's Words alone (Sola Scriptura) and the Holy spirit will guide you into truth. Accept the words of men and of Church traditions and you set yourself up for a great fall by building upon unsound foundation. Souls of those who are beheaded for Christ's sake do not rise up out of the earth to reign literally in Jerusalem. The Saints upon their death immediately go to Heaven to Reign with Christ! The teaching that this chapter says souls are literally reigning on earth in Jerusalem, is untenable. But it's repeated so often that those who do not carefully compare Theologians words with the scriptures, have actually told me that this was explicitly written there. i.e., they heard it so much that they really think that this verse actually says that. In Reality John says (the Word of God says) that he saw souls "of" the martyred, reigning! He saw the souls of those killed (Beheaded). Not Souls (which could be people), and not Martyrs, but the "Souls, of the martyrs!" And since when does souls of the dead Martyrs reign on the earth? Why would a soul apart from his body, be reigning in a literal city in the middle east? These souls reign in the Jerusalem from above, not in an earthly nation, Holy City, or Holy Temple. A Spiritual Holy Nation, the Jerusalem from above (Gal. 4:26). " From Revelation 20 Tony Warren

Help!

1,891 posted on 09/26/2002 10:21:47 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1882 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
No Woody, that is Zechariah. He is found in that unused portion
of your bible. You should read it some time before you start
pecking on your keyboard -- you give wood peckers and
engineers a bad name.
1,892 posted on 09/26/2002 10:26:16 AM PDT by Woodkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1890 | View Replies]

To: xzins; ksen; Jerry_M; RnMomof7; CCWoody; Jean Chauvin; sola gracia; OrthodoxPresbyterian
It all relates to knowing God's revealed will. Those portions of His past, present, and future will that He has revealed can be a schematic for us to assist us in our living and our praying.

Fulfilled prophecy, like those relating to the life and crucifixion of Jesus, are provided as a testimony to the truth of the Word as revealed by the Spirit to those who are in Christ or who God is calling to Him. Most of the prophecy in the Bible is fulfilled. Much of this fulfilled prophecy was given as a testimony to God's existence and control of human events and was only proven after its fulfillment. God is determined to make Himself known to men and that they should know that His Word is the only true description of Him, that He is the only "I am that I am".

Assming for a moment that the premillennialists are correct, the unfulfilled prophecies that remain (Isaiah, Daniel, Revelation) might be seen in somewhat the same light.

Maybe we need to ask how God has used prophecy throughout the Word, in all the portions orthodox Christians agree are already fulfilled.

It's like this -- if I know the direction He's walking then I can walk that same direction. If the Lord is commanding the universe in a certain direction, then I can get with His flow, or I can battle against the current trying to go upstream against Him.

Naturally, we Calvinists expect you to have some difficulty with these matters. It's inevitable. Been there, done that. You have our sympathy. Really.

These prophecies (adopting again the premillennialist view) are already ordained. You (and every other person who ever lived and the entire host of fallen angels in hell) could bend every fiber of your beings to defeat or change them or assist their fulfillment and it would not matter one whit.

You can't alter these events. If you could, they would not be the holy prophecy of the eternal God whose Word cannot lie.

Since every created being is powerless to assist in the fulfillment or defeat of any true prophecy, then the prophecies can only be seen as instruction to believers, your prayers can only help you to be in alignment with God's plan and, as a minister, help you to preach the Word correctly so your own flock is in accord with the Word.

In some areas, He has specifically revealed His will as opposed to generally revealing His will. If I so desire, I can work with Him and experience enhanced coordination of effort. Eschatology assists me in knowing what to pray for and what not to pray for.

I begin to suspect that you have some inkling of the underlying problem the entire Arminian viewpoint has with the foreordained prophecy of the eternal Word, which cannot lie.

You keep insisting that your free will has some bearing upon the results of God's prophesied plan for mankind. And God cannot lie. Let the word of God be true then and every man a liar.

<smug Calvinist barb>If only you'd let Him show you the heart of these matters...</smug Calvinist barb>

There is real comfort when we finally surrender every vestige of free will to Him.



Have you ever considered that these prophecies are not intended to be studied exhaustively and create entire financial empires for packs of scoundrels who misuse them but may in fact be intended to be something that will become apparent to all Christians in the final days prior to either the Rapture or the Tribulation [I'm speaking of premillennialism as a whole, not either the Historics or the Dispensationalists.].

Adopting the premillennial dispensationalist view: what if these prophecies are intended to be the warning that grants believers the knowledge of the end of time and gives them the courage to make their final testimonies before the Rapture and those testimonies and their subsequent supernatural disappearance is exactly that which God will use to convict the hearts of the Tribulation saints during that time when He withdraws His spirit from men?

Adopting the historic premillennialist view: what if these prophecies are intended to give God's remnant the faith and the vision in the final days and in the Tribulation itself to witness to the power and glory of God, to lay down their lives in testimony as the ancient church did against Rome and the pagan religions?

Given either of these outlooks on premillenialism and my suggestions for how they may be fulfilled and their actual purpose in God's plan, do you really thing it is profitable to spend a great deal of time arguing verb tenses and spewing essentially literary arguments over which portions to read literally and which to read figuratively?

I somehow doubt it. Call me a cynic.

Adopting the premillennial view, I think that the prophecies will serve a certain purpose in God's plan. I think that that the prophecies are given as a guide to those in the last days. And it won't take dissection of Greek verb tenses to know it. A basic acquaintance with the scripture will make it plain and I suspect that God will find a way to draw the attention of all His children to it. After all, the prophecy would do no good if He didn't ensure that our attention was upon it at the right time, would it?

So, vast amounts of prophecy study are likely to be a waste of time since every last person who ever lived and believed that the prophecy would be fulfilled in their lifetimes has thus far been wrong and therefore founding their beliefs and actions on that which is demonstrably unbiblical.

But we should be acquainted with the fundamentals of the various millennial views. To be prepared. But various forms of millennarian nuttiness (or complacency) aren't a service to God and may in fact be detrimental to the cause of Christ.

In the end, the real issue of Christian life is Christ and His indwelling of our hearts, the Holy Spirit of God guiding us to do His will. If we have that, the evil of men and the hosts of hell cannot triumph over us. If we don't have that, no amount of literary or linguistic knowledge of the scripture will help us.



Have the premillennialists noticed that the amillenialists (and others) essentially have pulled their horse out of the race and announced that they have won?

There is a certain spiritual advantage to premillennialism. It is activist, not passive. It leaves the premillennialist square in the middle of the Bible and he has a part to play in the end of time. But to the other millennialists, they have almost no personally relevant prophecy left to fulfill. They have joined Francis Fukuyama in declaring history is at an end. It's not particularly appealing to most of us. That doesn't tell us whether it's true or not though.

It sounds good but it isn't all it's cracked up to be just because it disposes of a lot of thorny issues and premillennarian nuttiness. But they are spared having to endure an association with the nutball books and personalities so strongly associated with premillennialism, particularly with the extreme dispensational variety.

In the end, there is nothing in these matters and the state of world events that justifies any harsh words over differences over eschatology. The Baptist Faith and Message tells me this. These are not matters which should determine our fellowship with others or the sort of matter that can legitimately split a church nor even be the occasion for harsh words between competing millennial interpretations. Nor, to us Calvinists at least, can they affect the salvation and eternal destiny of a single soul.

With all these Calvinists around, you had to expect a little Calvinism to rear its ugly head. After all, foreordained events and God's absolute sovereignty with regard to either the end of this world or in the salvation of a soul, are something of an obsession with us.

1,893 posted on 09/26/2002 10:28:21 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1851 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M; RnMomof7
A "filthy rotten sinner" observation for this morning...

RnMom and I were just chuckling over this a few days ago. Your mention of it must be a sign of the End Times. I'll start typing, you call Zondervan...
1,894 posted on 09/26/2002 10:31:27 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1859 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Woodkirk; fortheDeclaration; drstevej; kjam22; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; ...
Rn, I am a post-trib rapture person. Pre and midtribbers will place the trib in a different position. This is how I think the bible explains it. Z.

1. Spread of the gospel.
2. Israel restored to own land.
3. a. Falling Away
....b. Temple restored
4. Antichrist
....a. 3.5 years of preparatory leadership
....b. Revealed in temple pretending to be god
....c. tribulation period begins
5. Tribulation. (3.5 years)(mark of beast, martyrdoms, etc.)
6. Lord's Return
....a. Descent from heaven
....b. Dead in Christ rise first
........(1) The resurrection "from the dead" or "out of" the dead; i.e., the others of the dead remain "dead" and these are taken "from" them.
........(2) lu 20:25 - but those who are considered worth to attain to THAT age and the resurrection FROM THE DEAD...
........(3) Php 3:11 - in order that I may attain to the resurrection FROM the dead.
........(4) Rev 20:5-6 - the REST of the dead did not come to life until the 1000 years were completed. (This is the first resurrection.) Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the 1st resurrection; over these the 2nd death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a 1000 years.
........(5) Rev 5:10; Rev 7:14; (Post-trib verse)
....c. Living IN CHRIST are raptured/changed/translated
....d. Battle with collected armies of antichrist & various kings.
....e. Lake of fire for AC & False Prophet
....f. Remainder of armies killed
7. Millennial Reign
....a. Satan bound for 1000 years
....b. Judgment of remaining Gentiles. Some thrown into lake of fire, others kept alive into millennial age.
....c. Judgment of remaining Jews. (see 7b)
8. Release of Satan after 1000 years.
....a. Gathers armies from humans living on earth. They are destroyed by God.
....b. Resurrection and judgment of the unjust.
9. Final consummation
....a. Earth consumed
....b. New heavens and new earth

1,895 posted on 09/26/2002 10:33:35 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1873 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Naturally, we Calvinists expect you to have some difficulty with these matters. It's inevitable. Been there, done that. You have our sympathy. Really.

*****grin****

1,896 posted on 09/26/2002 10:35:21 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1893 | View Replies]

To: Woodkirk
So, in your "day of the Lord women get raped" Millennium, do the men have to castrate themselves and wear nike shoes?
1,897 posted on 09/26/2002 10:36:25 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1892 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
LOL I thought of our exchange when I read that too...we do not talk for months and when we do we both recall that and LOL...then Jerry posts that ..ummmmmmmm predestined I'd say:>)
1,898 posted on 09/26/2002 10:37:31 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1894 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What you posted has been pretty much my understanding...I think your post trib rapture puts you with a foot in the historic Pre mil camp
1,899 posted on 09/26/2002 10:40:27 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Hey, do you think that the spirits of Hannibal and Hitler and the Hun will be allowed to endure in the Millennial kingdom so Satan can recruit them to lead his armies? And how many saints will be recruited for these armies to rebel against the Lord?

Wow, no wonder the Lord will have to have that rod or iron; there will be quite a few blasphemous heretics in Paradise that will need to be dashed into pieces.
1,900 posted on 09/26/2002 10:47:25 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,861-1,8801,881-1,9001,901-1,920 ... 2,721-2,722 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson