Posted on 07/25/2002 5:31:43 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
A number of disturbing reports are heard lately that some of the Holy Father's former friends are in danger of collapsing in the storms; collapsing into the chaos of selective obedience, into the dangers of private judgment's non sequiturs. Michael Rose is trucking with pope-bashers and marketing his books through them, Robert Sungenis is rashly attacking the Pope on Assisi, Patrick Madrid is selling his books at a notorious pope-trashing website and giving "exclusive" excerpts to that site which also peddles the works of the worst schismatics who publicly call for an official "suspension of obedience" to the "Popes of Vatican II," and who gleefully and absurdly predict that JPII will be deposed for heresies. A group called "Roman Catholic Faithful" is openly publishing the works of these men too. Gerry Matatics, of course, has long shown aggressive solidarity with all these.
At first one hopes there is a misunderstanding. Maybe it's just the fact that a certain small percentage of converts or reverts will inevitably go off the rails for a time; maybe they have not fully overcome their fundamentalist spirit and suspicions toward "Rome," or their instinctive splitting into "remnants," and their personalistic "evangelism" wherein if they feel they are "called" to go on the circuit preaching tour, then they infer they must be "sent" by God, though this is contrary to all Catholic teaching, obedience and humility.
Maybe, though---which God forbid---it is a less innocent motive: simply the desire for money. What many, if not most, of these have in common is something to sell. Books, tapes, magazines, whatever...And maybe they haven't considered how immoral it is from a Catholic point of view to put marketing and personal security above the Truth. Michael Davies has long allowed the most virulent Pope-attackers to publish and sell his books and has led the way in all this. Cottage industries need "markets". Ask Fr. Gruner.
Better to sell no books, or just one book, with the Pope, than a million apart from him. Better to have Our Lord's warning about millstones around ones neck and judgment than to scandalize Christ's innocent ones by leading them into wolves dens to sell ones books or magazines.
Whatever the case, some of these cannot easily plead ignorance, even if others are merely confused. Most know what is what where websites and infamous Integrists are concerned. The goal of the older, more cynical Integrists has long been to pretend that conservatives and integrists are doing the same thing, which is absurd.
It only takes a little poison...
Whatever the case, it appears that some are showing signs of whithering on the Vine. They seem to be moving from complete loyalty to the Holy Father and the teaching Church to a place of shadows where fidelity mixes with persecution.
Invariably, when one points this out and shouts a warning, the more experienced and cynical in the ways of schism and anti-papal doctrinal collapse encourage their neophytes to respond with absurd charges of ultramontanism or to cynically shout down, ad hominem, the ones who try to warn them, as if no dogmatic certainties were at stake: "Who made YOU the measure of the Catholic Faith! Canon law allows criticism!"
Yes, but not this kind of criticism which moves qualitatively from inner personal concern or "dissent" to outright public attack, which even has the temerity to charge the Popes with heresies or rupture with Tradition which is the second prong of revelation itself.
The Holy Father and living magisterium, the teaching Church, is the measure of the Faith, not Catholic persons or groups.
We are living in sad times. When, earlier, I saw my old friends moving toward the cliffs of schism, well beyond constructive criticism, when they refused to hear the warnings, I knew it was time to bail. One's soul was at stake. I saw the logical trajectory of private judgment toward which Integrist presuppositions were leading .
The Holy Father is being persecuted from all sides today in something like apocalyptic storms. And now, some of his former friends are showing signs of deserting that cross and blaming him for the consequences of not heeding his own teachings-----and they do not see how ironic and absurd and tragic that is.
Real traditionalists---such as we are proud to be--- have their wheels on the dogmatic rails. Ask any Neo-modernist and he'll tell you where TCR is on the theological spectrum and they will not hesitate to say we are traditionalists, but with our wheels on the tracks, with Peter, who, together with his bishops, alone has the right to mediate, interpret, and develop Catholic Tradition.
Sometimes a warning must be sounded.
I know you folks think Lefebvre is a Saint. Name for me one Saint, Athanasius isn't one, who died unreconciled to the Church?
The SSPX now cites the WSJ as a souce of Theological expertise?
Really? So, when one sees his website reads TRCnews the "T" stands for "conservative" not "traditional?"
Point them out to me on freerepublic.com.
O.k. Bud, ultima ratio, shall I go on..they are all about you on many threads
Were you to read some history of the Liturgy of the Mass you would learn there was a long time when after the Consecration, announcements were read BEFORE Communion. Put that in your schismatic pipe....
ALL Catholic are traditionalists but it is The Magisterium, not Matt, Vennari, Gruener, McLucas or others which decides what is and isn't Tradition. Far too many on the schismatic mistake accidents for substance
I did not start these internecine battles. I simply got caught in the middle of one because a friend of mine is an "enemy" of the Pope, according to Hand, and as such, I have been arbitrarily branded by Hand as an extreme trad and integrist, a charge that is ludicrous on its face. Nonetheless, I will remove you, independantmind, from my ping list. I apologize, my other computer crashed, and I was using a different ping list that you happened to be on.
Frankly, I'm sick and tired of the trads and their nasty bitter feuds, and I'm sick and tired of Hand branding innocent people as trads or integrists or extremists who are nothing of the sort.
The materials on TCRNews.com may well be orthodox to the Nth degree. I always found them so.
But the nasty and arrogant and patronizing judging of mens' souls and mens' motives must stop.
This article branded Rose, Sungenis, and Madrid as men, once friends of JPII, who have walked away from the Pope. This is total BS. I don't care how "orthodox" he may appear, Hand is as out of control as those he criticizes.
And with that, I'll not say anything more on the subject.
I apologize for extending these feuds on this thread and this forum, and drawing others into this mire.
How do you understand "unreconciled?"
When Jesus gave Peter the Keys and told him "What you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven what you loose on Earth will be loosed in Heaven," do you think Jesus had in mind that anyone who labelled themselves "traditionalist" would be exempted from this declaration?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.