Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Have faith: Why women will be priests
Chicagotribune.com ^ | July 14, 2002 | Prof. Garry Wills

Posted on 07/14/2002 7:40:50 AM PDT by heyheyhey

Edited on 07/14/2002 11:32:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The Catholic Church, that claims to learn from the ages through which it has perdured, will learn in time that policies formed when women were considered inferior cannot survive in our day.

Some claim that the pedophile-priest scandal has nothing to do with the mandatory celibacy rule for Roman Catholic priests. But a majority of Catholics agree that "priestly celibacy increases the chances of sexual abuse"--51 percent in a Dallas Morning News poll and 52 percent in a Canadian News poll. This is a matter of common sense. How can anyone doubt that the abuse of minors would not have spread so far in secret if priests' wives or women priests had been part of the church's structure? Recent articles have noted how many of the whistle-blowers in recent business scandals have been women. They were not bound by the boys' club rules of the past.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; moron; morons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: Theresa
Same as the Holy Spirit as feminine,...

Oh yes, Holy Sophia or some such chimera. I don't have my research tools here, but if I recall my greek well enough, the greek word pneuma, (english = spirit) carries the neuter indefinite article. Except when used in Holy Scripture referring to the Holy Spirit where the masculine, not feminine, indefinite article is used. I'm 99% sure this is correct. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. Sophia is latin for 'wisdom'.

41 posted on 07/15/2002 5:52:07 PM PDT by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Evangelium Vitae
Will he be declared a heretic? No, though he is. Will the Church exercise any discipline in this matter? No. Should She? Yes

LOL! Such loquaciousness! My Ontological Reality Meter, ORM for short, tells me you're male. Answers; short, direct, to the point. Oh, and accurate. Say, have you thought about being a bishop...

Then again my meter could be low on batteries... I just needed a chance to use the word 'loquacious'; been waiting to do it since learning it in high school. Nonetheless, this exchange reminds me of Tommy Lee Jones in MIB, which I just saw again to prepare for MIB 2, answering Will Smith about the "flashy-thingy"

(Briskly walking down a hall, J behind K)

J: How many times have you flashy-thingyed her before?

K: A couple

J: Aren't you worried in might affect her brain?

K: A little

J: Have you flashy-thingyed me?

K: No

J: No, really, HAVE YOU EVER FLASHY-THINGYED ME?

K: No ...

42 posted on 07/15/2002 6:48:09 PM PDT by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
I think I may add this book to my reading list: "Ungodly Rage: The Hidden Face of Catholic Feminism" by Donna Steichen

And it's 30% off! Even at full price, this looks like a winner! Think I'll order a copy myself.

A compendium of true stories surrounding feminism gone bad, February 19, 2000
Reviewer: A reader from New York
What happens when women fighting for a voice in the Church turn away from the very things every Catholic holds to be true? Find out in this book! It may scandalize some people, but I'm afraid it's the truth. Donna Steichen has even said that radical feminists have tried to stop the circulation of this book but simply cannot because it's all documented! Steichen shows where radical feminism in the Church has taken us and it's not a pretty place. It truly is a collection of horror stories showing how things went awry. Recommended for anyone who wants to understand how things got to be so bad in women's religious communities and how true feminism in the Church was perverted.

43 posted on 07/15/2002 7:22:10 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TotusTuus
Sophia is Latin...

The biblical “sophia” is a Greek word. It is indeed a feminine noun. In Latin “wisdom” is also a feminine noun “sapientia.” E.g. -- sapientia edificavit sibi domum -- translated as “wisdom has built herself a home” -- Proverbs 9:1.

A quick search on the internet shows how folks (from the feminist spheres mostly) are fascinated with the femininity of that word “sophia.” The actual wisdom exposed on those web sites seems adversely proportional to the excitement about the femininity of that word.

What those folks do not realize is that in most languages, Greek, and Latin included, nouns have three genders, masculine, feminine, and neuter. The genders have little to do with biology. Greek can be tricky -- e.g. feminine Greek words “agricola” (a farmer) or “nauta” (a sailor) depict originally entirely masculine occupations. English is a genderless language where gender is attributed, with seldom exceptions, to persons only. In English, we do not think or speak of a chair, or a doorknob, or lint as of “him” or “her” ;)

44 posted on 07/15/2002 10:40:38 PM PDT by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
Um, can you show me where God's will is expressly given to command "celibacy" of priests?
45 posted on 07/16/2002 7:01:13 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Um, can you show me where God's will is expressly given to command "celibacy" of priests?

The Catholic Church has a great deal of writing on this topic. Have you looked at any of it?

46 posted on 07/16/2002 7:36:33 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
I don't equate the rites and traditions of the Catholic Church with "God's will." The fact is even the current Pope has acknowledged that this is a tradition that is simply being upheld AS a tradition, not "God's will."

That was my point. You may believe as you wish, but you cannot demonstrate that this is "God's will," any more than you can prove how many angels can dance on the head of a pin (another traditional preoccupation of Catholic thought).

47 posted on 07/16/2002 7:48:07 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
That was my point. You may believe as you wish, but you cannot demonstrate that this is "God's will," any more than you can prove how many angels can dance on the head of a pin (another traditional preoccupation of Catholic thought).
48 posted on 07/16/2002 7:59:30 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Um, can you show me where God's will is expressly given to command "celibacy" of priests?

Um, read the Biblical Rationale for Celibacy at this link

http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ109.HTM
49 posted on 07/16/2002 8:04:06 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
For some reason, my response wasn't posted. I meant to say "Please provide evidence of this alleged preoccupation with angels dancing on the head of a pin."
50 posted on 07/16/2002 8:05:56 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
Your apologetics are inspiring! Great analysis.
51 posted on 07/16/2002 8:28:58 AM PDT by el_chupacabra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
You may believe as you wish, but you cannot demonstrate that this is "God's will," any more than you can prove how many angels can dance on the head of a pin (another traditional preoccupation of Catholic thought).

Angels dancing on pins is an stereotypical criticism of scholaticism. It has never been a "traditional preoccupation of Catholic thought."

I'm not sure what sort of demonstration of God's will you're personally looking for, and I don't really care to debate epistemology with you. The Catholic Church is satisfied discerning God's will through His Scriptures and the traditions of His Church, interpreted for us through the teaching authority of the Magesterium. Obviously, this is not something non-Catholics accept. If that's your point it's a rather obvious one, and not terribly relevant to the discussion on this thread.

52 posted on 07/16/2002 8:37:29 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
It's sort of a catch-all poking fun at Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica, which variously inquired into such essential areas of the Gospel as whether Christ was a hermaphrodite, or whether people in heaven use the bathroom, or whether the hair and nails will grow following the Resurrection, or whether the Resurrection will take place at night.

My point was there is an awful lot of silliness in Roman Catholic tradition, so that exalting all of it isn't necessarily a good idea.

In my own religion, we have specific statements from God that it is NOT right to forbid marriage to anyone. I can support your insistence upon your traditions, certainly, but absolutely refuse to let pass the contention that it is "God's will," when I know that it is expressly CONTRARY to His will.

53 posted on 07/16/2002 8:45:07 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I don't equate the rites and traditions of the Catholic Church with "God's will."

Of course not.
If you did, then you would’ve liked to become a Catholic :)

54 posted on 07/16/2002 8:54:35 AM PDT by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
Precisely right. Although I would add, that the GOOD things, the GODLY things that Catholics do are absolutely in concert with God's will. I don't want to be mistaken simply for a "Catholic basher," I'm not. I'm just pointing out that as a bolster for the contention that priests should remain celibate, this argument re "God's will" is sorely lacking.
55 posted on 07/16/2002 9:05:47 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
Why women will be priests

Women will ONLY be priests IF and ONLY IF, they are Haters of the 66 books of The Holy Bible.....THE ONLY WORD (message/Special Revelation) from the ONE and ONLY GOD!

Women will ONLY be priests IF and ONLY IF, as being therefore in "Rebellion" against the ONE and ONLY GOD, they therefore REJECT the Biblical SEVEN DAY account of CREATION by THE CREATOR/REEDEMER GOD,......and become Religious PHILOSOPHERS!
(Atheists, Pagans, Evolutionists, Heathen, Magicians, Witchgraft, etc!!!)

Women will ONLY be priests IF and ONLY IF, they HATE the HOLY SPIRIT of GOD, Moses, Jacob, and the PROMISES TO ISRAEL concerning INHERITANCE of the Nation of all ISRAEL as the PREMIERE REIGNING NATION (for 1,000 years) under Jesus Christ's Personal Messianic RULE/REIGN on "David's Throne" in Zion!!!

56 posted on 07/16/2002 9:30:52 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
The requirement for priestly celibacy in the Catholic Church may certainly be a bit difficult to comprehend for both non-Catholic persons and for some under-catechized Catholics, just as is the case of all-male Catholic priesthood.

In discussions on those subjects different people use different types of arguments depending on their agenda, knowledge, creed, emotions etc. Many times, deliberately or not, the different kinds of arguments get obnoxiously mixed up in discussions.

Living in accord with the “Divine will” is the ultimate goal in life of a religious person. For the genuine Catholics things are pretty straight forward -- the Divine will, wisdom, presence, salvation, and grace are all within the Catholic Church. Discussing priestly celibacy and all-male priesthood for the Catholic Church but independently of the Church’s teachings and outside of the Tradition (different from “tradition”) is bound to raise unproductive emotions and confusion.
Please check post #28
57 posted on 07/16/2002 10:01:07 AM PDT by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: maestro; Antoninus
Repeating the words of Antoninus in post #22,
I have no doubt that women will be priestesses ... just not in the Catholic Church...
58 posted on 07/16/2002 10:02:07 AM PDT by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TotusTuus
Not that this has anything to do with the thread, but my kids love that exchange between K and J. If I hear it reenacted once a day I must hear it over a dozen times. They all take turns being K and J. ;^)
59 posted on 07/16/2002 11:10:25 AM PDT by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
"It's sort of a catch-all poking fun at Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica, which variously inquired into such essential areas of the Gospel as whether Christ was a hermaphrodite, or whether people in heaven use the bathroom, or whether the hair and nails will grow following the Resurrection, or whether the Resurrection will take place at night."

Have you read The Summa? Can you produce the citations to source what you have just claimed?
60 posted on 07/16/2002 11:26:38 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson