Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2002 6:45:16 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tiki; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; livius; ...
Ping
2 posted on 07/08/2002 6:45:54 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses; sitetest; Gophack; HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Additional information on this thread: Eucharistic Ministers
10 posted on 07/08/2002 7:16:36 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
I always wondered how the new practice came about. I like the idea of Communion rails and ringing of the bells at the time of consecration. Those are two things I missed and two reasons I like the Latin Mass.
21 posted on 07/08/2002 7:37:56 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
In 1976 Call to Action, an influential group of Catholic dissenters (recently condemned in Nebraska by Bishop Bruskewitz), added to their agenda the promotion of communion-in-the-hand.

That about says it all! I'm with you, narses. The reverence, aura and respect for the Eucharist is missing today. Oh, yes, one can make the liturgical arguments that the others on this thread, have already made. My guess is that they weren't around before Vatican II. The first time I took the host in my hands, it seemed wrong and out of place.

Surprisingly, no one has bothered to question the hands of the Eucharistic Minister! The priest washes his hands during the mass. What about the Eucharistic Minister? What were their hands doing before arriving at church? How often have I taken the host, only to taste perfume on it.

28 posted on 07/08/2002 7:51:53 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses; crazykatz; don-o; JosephW; lambo; MarMema; MoJoWork_n; newberger; one_particular_harbour; ..
I think you'll find that this is one of those points upon which West and East will disagree! We, the Orthodox and your Byzatine Catholics, will only recieve the body and the blood of Christ directly, never in the hand.
37 posted on 07/08/2002 11:58:50 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
Good post narses.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned in the discussion is that the practice of communion in the hand leads to tiny particles of Our Lord being strewn across the floor of the church. This does not happen when communion is administered at the communion rail with an alter server holding the pan under your chin. I know I wouldn't be afraid of shaking hands with Jesus were he to appear before me, but would I stomp him under my foot?

52 posted on 07/09/2002 10:31:52 AM PDT by Bellarmine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
It boggles my mind how anyone can argue that faith in the Real Presnce is not weakened, or that lack of respect for the Blessed Sacrament is not common, as they "deal with" fragments of the Host strewn all over the floor of the Church. I guess just blocking it from your mind is not the same as denying that Christ is now Really Present under your feet.
53 posted on 07/09/2002 3:59:56 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
I'm wondering if the use of lay persons as Extraordinary Euchartisiic Minister has weakens faith in the Real Presence among the Faith communities.
60 posted on 07/10/2002 8:20:45 AM PDT by Charles_Bingley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson