Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense [THE FINAL DEBUNKING]
Scientific American ^ | 17 June 2002 | John Rennie

Posted on 06/17/2002 3:10:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 2,461-2,474 next last
To: yendu bwam
JennyP - Why do you think such a large portion of mankind is Christian (or tries to be)?

As you might gather from my last post, it's because their ancestors at some point were forced to believe at spearpoint.

I'll heartily concede that Christianity is "better for you" than Islam, and many people do make a more-or-less informed decision about which belief system to accept or reject. And both these religions have converted specific peoples, at one time or another in their histories, more thru evangelism than thru force alone.

But the sad fact is that historically both of these huge religions acheived their impressive growth thru State-sanctioned oppression.

761 posted on 06/17/2002 7:18:24 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
BTW, even in your syllogism, Pakicetus remains the most probable common ancestor of its day for both whales and hippos. That the branch point is later is IIRC assumed generally now and wouldn't put a dent in anyone's fender on the E side of things.

(Nice try.)

762 posted on 06/17/2002 7:20:12 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Arrived at how? Why predict missing links? Need they have existed? If yes, why? If no, how do you know when to predict them?

Take Darwin, substitute cellular engineering for random mutation and substitute cellular engineering and natural culling for natural selection. Stir, use brain, and proceed. Any other questions, wait for the book, "The Death of Darwin". Coming soon.

763 posted on 06/17/2002 7:20:58 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Would your beliefs change if you found that you were the only Christian left on earth tomorrow?

If I were the only human being still alive tomorrow, would my perception of the color green be invalid because there remained no other human being alive to discern the color green?

Would the color green lose its "greenness" if I were then also to die?

764 posted on 06/17/2002 7:21:13 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Pakicetus remains the most probable common ancestor of its day for both whales and hippos.

Nope. Just an also ran. He could remain a mesonychus nephew for all it matters.

765 posted on 06/17/2002 7:23:15 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Paganism therefore disappeared from the world for two reasons: the relentless persecution by Christians and the assimilation of pagan ideas into Christianity. [a]

You don't think all the human sacrafice, cannibalism, headhunting, and debauchery and what not had anything to do with the demise of paganism??

I mean, you can read about pagan rituals in the old testament till the cows come home and it's all the same and, if anything, they'd gotten worse by Christian times. Consider:

I mean, what kind of a rotten SOB is gonna burn his kids alive for the benefit of some stupid stone or wooden idol? Better yet, how is somebody doing that kind of #### gonna be worse off for being converted to Christianity?

766 posted on 06/17/2002 7:24:04 PM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Take Darwin, substitute cellular engineering for random mutation and substitute cellular engineering and natural culling for natural selection. Stir, use brain, and proceed. Any other questions, wait for the book, "The Death of Darwin". Coming soon.

Model evolution precisely, replace the words "mutation and natural selection" with "this generation's separate, distinct, and slightly improved version from the Designer" and voila! If anyone asks what your theory explains better, say, "It explains all future observations better!"

If anyone asks what it explains less well, say, "Extinctions."

767 posted on 06/17/2002 7:24:56 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
No Christian ever committed the atrocities you allude to. Prove me wrong.
768 posted on 06/17/2002 7:25:39 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry

But history shows it's because the Christians murdered their priests, priestesses, philosophers, etc. as soon as they had the power of the State at their command.

No Christian ever did this. Ever.

You judge by appearances. That is where you fail.

Ah, I see: A Christian is defined as someone who does two things:

  1. believes in Christ and
  2. doesn't do anything that Kevin Curry disapproves of.

That is an airtight definition there, Kevin! :-)

769 posted on 06/17/2002 7:27:53 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Nope. Just an also ran. (Pakicetus)

You can substantiate this shocking bit of news? What replaced Paki as the most likely common ancestor of whales and hippos circa 55 mya? Show me the article.

And it's still true that whales didn't used to have walking and amphibious ancestors. Evolution predicted them. They turned up.

770 posted on 06/17/2002 7:27:59 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
You think people no longer worship Athena, etc., because they made some kind of rational decision. But history shows it's because the Christians murdered their priests, priestesses, philosophers, etc. as soon as they had the power of the State at their command. In other words, they persecuted them even worse than they were persecuted in the previous century. (A Christian in pre-Constantine Rome could legally stay a Christian as long as they rendered a yearly tax unto Caesar's gods like every other Roman citizen and didn't make waves with their proseltyzing. But Constantine's successors murdered the non-Christian intelligencia

J and P


771 posted on 06/17/2002 7:28:30 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Lefist Scientific American can't even get the hilarious evolution theory right. Also note, the "nonsense" that they associate with Creation isn't stated by your objective and pedigreed scientists who are able to accept that something doesn't come out of nothing. What comes out of nothing IS nothing - not a "big bang" with some unknown cause.

Unlike evolutionists, I can be objective and look to objective science as well as common sense to know that God created all we see and don't see. An evolutionist can't get beyond him/herself and don't believe in God. An atheist could NEVER accept that there is a God and that they inspite of their NUMEROUS hoaxes still can't find the "missing Link". They never will because it doesn't exist. I find it amusing. It's like watching a dog going around in circles chasing its tail. Their logic, if you can all it that, is also circular and defies the very laws of science that they worship. Evolution is good for a few laughs but this thread has me laughing even harder at the lengths an evolutionist will go to villify truth and how the idea of God, scares the crap out of em.

LOL to evolutionists! They are the most illogical emotional people you'll ever meet.

772 posted on 06/17/2002 7:29:20 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
That is an airtight definition there, Kevin!

You're dodging the question. Cite the true definition--not the one you made up.

773 posted on 06/17/2002 7:30:08 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
ID is applied in science and life everyday – just to man-made items though. Science will not ‘allow’ it to be applied to biology because it’s not man-made.

“When its empirical resources are exhausted, science itself closes the door to naturalistic explanation. -William A. Dembski

Once ID is let in to biology we can use it, as any other design theory, to make predictions:

Variability Problem -- What degree of perturbation allows continued functioning? Alternatively, what is the range of variability within which the designed object functions and outside of which it breaks down?

Restoration Problem -- Once perturbed, how can the original design be recovered? Art restorers, textual critics, and archeologists know all about this.

Optimality Problem -- In what sense is the designed object optimal?

Separation of Causes Problem -- How does one tease apart the effects of intelligent causes from natural causes, both of which could have affected the object in question? For instance, a rusted old Cadillac exhibits the effects of both design and weathering?

Intentionality Problem -- What was the intention of the designer in producing a given designed object?

Identity Problem -- Who is the designer? -William A. Dembski

774 posted on 06/17/2002 7:31:36 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
"natural culling"!
775 posted on 06/17/2002 7:31:45 PM PDT by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
If anyone asks what it explains less well, say, "Extinctions."

Nope, big rocks from the sky does that quite well, thank you very much.(extinctions that is)

776 posted on 06/17/2002 7:34:30 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
The platypus - a creature which shares traits with mammals (mammary glands, three earbones, fur, vocalization), birds (duck like bill, webbed feet), reptiles (egg laying, , cloaca, poison spur), fish (fins, electro receptor). No one can say how all the above features and characteristics of this one animal could have descended from a single species.

Of course God knew evolutionist wackos would be here today and wanted to give everyone a good laugh, watching them try to explain that one.

777 posted on 06/17/2002 7:34:51 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Nebullis
Something picked out from others, especially something rejected because of inferior quality

Pick a better word if you don't like it.

778 posted on 06/17/2002 7:35:47 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Do you even know the true definition?

Do you know why "believes in Christ" is not sufficient?

If you don't know the true definition of a Christian, how can you accuse any "Christian" of these atrocities?

Is this how you do science as well?

779 posted on 06/17/2002 7:37:32 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 769 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
I answered you on Dembski already. When you repeat what people have already answered, and to the same people at that, clearly inviting what programmers call an "infinite loop," you risk turning into gore3000.
780 posted on 06/17/2002 7:38:04 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 2,461-2,474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson