Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EWTN TV USCCB Coverage Of The Summer Session
EWTN Television ^ | June,2002 | staff

Posted on 06/09/2002 5:16:31 PM PDT by Lady In Blue

USCCB COVERAGE OF THE SUMMER SESSION


EWTNews Director, Raymond Arroyo and his guest will provide extensive coverage of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Summer Plenary Session. Tune in for daily live coverage of the events.

PREVIEW SHOW:

Wed. June 12, 8:00 PM Live

Wed. June 12, 10:00 PM (encore)

Thursday June 13, 2:00 AM (encore)

Thursday June 13, 9:00 AM (encore)


MORNING SESSION (4 HRS) LIVE:

Thursday June 13, 2002 10:00 AM

Thursday June 13, 2002 9:00 PM (encore)

AFTERNOON SESSION (4 HRS) LIVE:

Thursday June 13, 2002 3:00 PM

Friday June 14, 2002 2:00 AM (encore)

MORNING SESSION (4 HRS) LIVE:

Friday June 14, 2002 10:00 AM

Friday June 14, 2002 8:00 PM (encore)

AFTERNOON SESSION (4 HRS)
LIVE:

Friday June 14, 2002 3:00 PM

Saturday June 15, 2002 1:00 AM (encore)

SESSION HIGHLIGHTS (60:00):

Saturday June 15, 2002 4:00 PM

Saturday June 15, 2002 10:00 PM (encore)

SESSION HIGHLIGHTS (60:00):

Sunday June 16, 2002 5:00 PM

Monday June 17, 2002 10:00 AM (encore)

Monday June 17, 2002 11:00 PM (encore)


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; gavelgavelcoverage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 461-477 next last
To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
The guy supposedly representing the orthodox position (The Catholic Alliance?) was somewhat inarticulate. Jet lag maybe?

Maybe jet lag. I thought he might just be new to TV and nervous; maybe not that used to public speaking at all.

321 posted on 06/13/2002 2:06:51 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
re:liberal/conservative

True, partly. The dissenters in the Church are actually modernist "liberals" who draw a lot of their inspiration from modern American culture, secular humanism, and the agenda of the social engineering wing of the U.S. Democratic Party. To the extent Catholics in the 1960s got involved in the anti-war and civil rights movements, they adopted the "liberal" style, jargon, attitudes, and behavior. Weakland was indeed a "liberal" in every sense that that word has come to mean in American culture since the 1960s.

322 posted on 06/13/2002 2:08:46 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore; eastsider; polycarp; siobhan; catholicguy; american colleen
They are not only perverts but perverts with an agenda. And they have a powerful presence in the hierarchy. Getting them out is not going to be easy. I don't understand why the Vatican has not stepped in on this.

Found the following article at the MSNBC web site. It discusses a document that was circulated at a conclave of american bishops, back in the '80's. This answers so many of our questions:

THE BISHOPS WERE being briefed about priests who sexually abuse minors. And a new, internal-eyes-only document was circulating at the highest levels that bore a chilling, simple message: The abuse problem had catastrophic potential.
It had been written, in part, by a canon lawyer, the Rev. Thomas P. Doyle. As the bishops met, two other men with a vital interest in the issue sat on a garden bench nearby. One was Thomas C. Fox, editor of the National Catholic Reporter, which had published a stunning report on abuse only days before. The other was Eugene C. Kennedy, a psychology professor whose exploration of the emotional maturity of priests had presaged the abuse cases.

BISHOPS WARNED OF ABUSE IN 1980'S

323 posted on 06/13/2002 2:09:32 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
ConSpiratio has the potential to be more than just a talking-shop.

Yes yes ... more discussion [and activism], less presentation. What a great idea.

I've got two more weeks of engagements and prior commitments and then I can go singleminded on the site for a while.

324 posted on 06/13/2002 2:09:39 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Televised and covered by the media?
325 posted on 06/13/2002 2:09:53 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; ThomasMore
HMBA, I am going to use your quote for O'Reilly, thank you.

You either obey the Magisterium or you dissent/disobey them. You either accept the teachings or reject them.

This is me, too. And I don't and have never liked "kumbaya," especially on guitar.

326 posted on 06/13/2002 2:10:31 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
My apologies for yelling. I just took a walk around the block to get some air. (Inhale ... 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... exhale ... 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4 ... 5 ... inhale ... 1 ... etc. : )
327 posted on 06/13/2002 2:15:17 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
I think what complicates things linguistically with political labels has a lot to do with the sexual immorality which is the focus of the "liberal" agenda of the U.S. Democrats. Because Catholicism opposes this agenda, it becomes associated with the "conservative" opposition to this agenda in American politics by evangelical Protestants and "conservative" Republicans. Americans have become used to thinking about the issues within this paradigm, an overly simplistic dichtomy based entirely on the structure and cultural peculiarities of contemporary American political culture.
328 posted on 06/13/2002 2:15:52 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Don't get all calm yet.

Check this out Do homosexuals make better priests?

There is no major barf alert on the header, but there should be.

329 posted on 06/13/2002 2:18:12 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: NYer
You bet they knew what was going on back in the 80s. Check out CBS' 60 Minutes II. The interviews with the victims were nauseating.
330 posted on 06/13/2002 2:19:19 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
And, really, a great number of educated "orthodox" Catholics in the U.S. are some type of cultural conservatives (from the point of view of what that means in U.S. culture).
331 posted on 06/13/2002 2:21:05 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: NYer
BISHOPS WARNED OF ABUSE IN 1980'S

An article in National Review mentioned the report a couple of issues back. I understand the way news of it started getting out is because plaintiffs' attorneys found out about it and got a copy. (I'm in Boston -- well placed for news.)

332 posted on 06/13/2002 2:22:27 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
And those qualities are three precious "gifts" that priests can use to "lead people closer to God in prayer," according to the article, written by Rev. James Martin, a Manhattan Jesuit.
Our good friends, the Jebbies. I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts this is one of the freaks who celebrate Rainbow Masses for Dignity.
333 posted on 06/13/2002 2:25:16 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
I don't understand why the Vatican has not stepped in on this.

First, the Vatican did step in with the meeting with the Cardinals last month. Cynical explanations aside, I think there are two forces at work: the pope's choice of a collegial, rather than an imperial papal model, which leaves success and failures up to the strengths and weaknesses of local prelates; and second, a near-paralyzing fear of schism which seems to control any matter of episcopal disciplinary action. The pope doesn't want his actions to become the involuntary foundation for a break-away AmChurch.

334 posted on 06/13/2002 2:28:51 PM PDT by Dumb_Ox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
homosexual penetration of the clergy.

I think I speak for all of us when I say, "can you please reformulate this part of your sentence?"

335 posted on 06/13/2002 2:32:15 PM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Televised and covered by the media?

Televised? Not to my knowledge. Covered by the media? Possibly; it's likely gonna be an SRO crowd. Our whole parish (±800 people) will probably be there.

Please pray for us.

Yours in Christian Fraternity,

B-chan

+
------------------ I N • H O C • S I G N O • V I N C E S ------------------

336 posted on 06/13/2002 2:32:23 PM PDT by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
The pope doesn't want his actions to become the involuntary foundation for a break-away AmChurch.

Or a break-away EuroChurch, or LatinoChurch, or AfroChurch.

337 posted on 06/13/2002 2:40:25 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
The pope doesn't want his actions to become the involuntary foundation for a break-away AmChurch.

Or at least an openly break-away AmChurch. I have tried to picture what exactly the pope could do -- remove bishops wholesale? not a bad idea, but the chaos might be uncontrollable; put offending dioceses under interdict? it appeals to me (in some moods), but picture the media storm; issue directives? we've seen how well that works with the 1961 prohibition on admitting homosexuals.

And this pope, at least, is so utterly centered on unity and reconciliation that it always gives me the feeling he knows more than we do, that he thinks there's not enough time left. I think it would truly kill him to cause more division. (How about smack the offending bishops upside the head? I'll volunteer for the team.)

338 posted on 06/13/2002 2:47:33 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: ALL
Regarding the Vatican's knowledge, I quote from last night's 60 Minutes II:
Mouton: The Vatican has been taking the position that this is all new to them. Well Gilbert Gauthe was the very first case in the United States, and they appointed AJ Quinn in writing. AJ Quinn puts the Vatican’s fingerprints on this problem in 1985.

That year, Ray Mouton and Father Tom Doyle gave Bishop Quinn a confidential report which warned the Church that cases of pedophile priests are “arising with increased frequency” around the country, and could eventually cost the Church “one billion dollars.” Mouton and Doyle asked Bishop Quinn to take the report to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

“They had a press conference in 1985, at this big meeting they said we’re gonna establish a committee to study this. I asked one of my contacts in the hierarchy who was on this committee. And he said there is no committee. It’s window dressing,” says Doyle.

“In a nutshell they did nothing,” says Doyle.

That was 1985. Tomorrow, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops will finally hold their first national meeting dedicated to the problems Doyle and Mouton urged them to address, 17 years ago.


339 posted on 06/13/2002 2:49:23 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: american colleen; siobhan
Fill me in. What did your letter say?
340 posted on 06/13/2002 2:50:27 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 461-477 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson