[JenB]

That was an excellent link, much clearer than the posted article. Now I know for certain that I'm not a hyper-Calvinist, nor does my church promote hyper-Calvinism. Also the related essay on supralapsarianism was informative - at least I know what it is now even if I can't spell it! I guess I'm more of an infralapsarian Calvinist.

Anyway this is an interesting debate, I just hope it doesn't get as dirty as a lot of other Calvinist/Arminianist threads.

[Jerry_M]

"Anyway this is an interesting debate, I just hope it doesn't get as dirty as a lot of other Calvinist/Arminianist threads."

You and me both!

(Glad that I could help, with the unintended consequence being your introduction to lapsarian speculative theology.)