patent
For the record, the_doc is not an Orthodox Presbyterian, he is a Reformed Baptist (gosh, this is *quite* well known).
I don't object to your affiliating "doc" with the OP church (gosh, I'd be perfectly happy if he *was* orthodox presbyterian), except for three minor reservations:
1.) It is not factual. I.E., it ain't a true statement, it is a lie.
2.) You dare to call OP's cowards... a hilariously vicious charge, given the Orthodox Presbyterian Church's incredibly disproportionate contribution to the Operation Rescue movement, and our steadfast application of Church Discipline in (for example) *immediately* excommuncating an elder found canonically guilty of a *single case* of marital adultery -- as opposed to a certain, un-named, abominable and perverse Institution which shelters degenerate pederasts guilty of hundreds of homosexual rapes. Ergo, the_doc is not an OP (not that I would mind one bit if he were), and OP's aren't cowards. (Good grief, your own dissatisfactions wiith me attend not to my cowardice, but to your distaste for my forthrightness).
3.) Given these facts, then, why would you pretend that "the_doc" is an Orthodox Presbyterian, and label Orthodox Presbytery as "cowards"? Is the Baptist Confession of which "the_doc" is actually a Member too big a target for your slanders? Afraid that labelling "Baptists" as "cowards" would make you too many enemies in one generalization, so instead you slander the smaller target (the Orthodox Presbyterian Church)? Not very sporting, Brian... in fact, rather cowardly.
As always, IMHO.