I haven’t been involved in any way with those who are still teaching Armstrong’s ideas for over 30 years now, but if I found a couple of truths have withstood the test of time, then should I throw them out, and replaced them with a belief that just doesn’t stick even if I would prefer them because they are more easily accepted by others?
Recently, this thread has dealt with those who won’t accept Jesus Christ as the begotten Son of God, those who condemn you for not going back under the law, and most here have been patient and understanding with them, but Doug differs in a small mater, the make up of Christ body after His resurrection, and everyone goes ballistic.
I see a pattern developing here that worries me.
RNMom, you seem to have a personal vendetta against Doug, and I remember not long ago when you were floating between Churches and were considering one that was into keeping the law, and I was concerned for you.
drstevej, you may not be aware of it, but Doug was searching for Christ when he began posting here and later he made his decision and was baptized. Hopefully after that, his idea of humor has changed since becoming a child of God, and one who will eventually be in God’s kingdom.
Most here should know I have disagreed with him many times, and on many matters, but I’ve never doubted his sincerity, nor have I seen any rudeness in him.
I really believe many of the attacks have become personal, and I don’t understand why. He has contributed many enjoyable post, and is an essential part of our discussions here. He deserves your respect and love if you have any real truths to share, not what you’ve demonstrated lately.
JH
drstevej, you may not be aware of it, but Doug was searching for Christ when he began posting here and later he made his decision and was baptized. Hopefully after that, his idea of humor has changed since becoming a child of God, and one who will eventually be in God’s kingdom.
No I like Doug alot..there is no vendetta . If a doctrinal debate makes you uncomfortable i am sorry .
This is about what constitutes a Christian ..the Bodily resurrection and the reality of hell and the trinity constitute a professing Christian .
This is America and everyone is free to have what ever religion they desire. Christen or not. But if you are going to present yourself as a Christian and promote a non Christian doctrine then you have to expect there will be debate.
This is probably the least important error of the Armstrong cult . But it is an interesting give and take..
I am sorry JH but Doug has a different god and a different Jesus than Christians do. He has a biunity god among other non standard doctrine
I'd settle for respect. :-)
Thanks for the kind words Jim.
I haven't condemned anyone. I don't recall seeing any posts where malakhi has condemned anyone. I don't recall seeing 1 spark condemn anyone. I don't even remember any post from Invincibly Ignorant that condemned anyone.
HOWEVER, I do recall OTHERS condemning people.......