Replies

Before suggesting visits to the proctologist, you would do well to go back and review the posts. It seems pretty obvious ventana was reacting to your 468 when he said, "Of course." In this, he was AGREEING with you. You then mistakenly took his "Of course" to be a reaction to your 473. It is evident his "Of course" was NOT a reaction to 473 for two reasons. First, because it shows specifically in v's post he was reacting to 468 -and second, because his 475 comes just one minute after your 473, not much time to really post a response to your 473.

Thus, the first mistake was yours. Misrepresenting (albeit unintentionally) v's views.

The second mistake may have been v's. It's difficult to tell since the post has been removed. It apprears he called you a liar and a scoundrel at the least. Perhaps a rash judgement on his part, but, frankly, having myself seen the number of times Catholic views are misrepresented on these threads I can understand his frustration, though it was uncalled for.

However, your 490 is disturbing. The first time you misrepresented his views, it was a mistake. Having been called on it, though, you then compound the error by reiterating it in your 490. I understand you may have a tendency to believe you are incapable of error, but you should review the posts and I think you'll see in this instance, it is you who are wrong.

Ok, which one of you guys hit the abuse button? :')

However, your 490 is disturbing. The first time you misrepresented his views, it was a mistake. Having been called on it, though, you then compound the error by reiterating it in your 490. I understand you may have a tendency to believe you are incapable of error, but you should review the posts and I think you'll see in this instance, it is you who are wrong.

AlguyA, your wrong, ventana threw the first punch after he thought ipeV had added words to his post.

v was wrong for not asking him why he mixed his answers up and used it to answer the wrong post.

This confusion came from v's not italicizing the question he's answering, but I noticed ipeV does when he post.

I ran into the same problem the last time ventana and I discussed crowns, and I had to keep going back in order to know what he was referring to. It was very confusing.

After the verbal barrage ipeV received, I think he handled it better then most of us old timers would have.

Ventana, that was a self righteous outburst that should not have happened.

You owe him an apology. ( He who throws the first punch……) When you attacked ipeV, he had no idea in the world what you were so mad about, you two had been having a great conversation between you until then.

IMO JH