[OLD REGGIE]

(DouglasKC) "... I answered that life insurance isn't a sin because you don't buy it out of covetness...the person who has life insurance on himself doesn't ever get to see the money if it pays off."

It becomes wrong when you gamble for money. That's what he said. I said to "Gamble with a financial payoff." I suppose you will now, rather than apologize, find some way that what I said was different.

Typical Dave

[SoothingDave]

So you're nto going to apologize? There's a surprise. Doug clearly said that any gambling for money was wrong. Life insurance, indisputably, is a gamble for money. That was the only point I was making.

All of which is completely irrelevant. I used Doug's definition. He says he didn't think he said it. You accused me of manufacturing the definition from spin.

Instead, I show exactly what he said, and lo and behold, it is exatly what I said he said.

If I am no longer allowed to use people's own words in a discussion with them, then I will leave.

An honest man would apologize for calling me a liar now. Are you an honest man? Is Doug? Did I or did I not use the very definition he gave me?

(The point of whether life insurance is a "Gamble" or nto is beside the point. That was my interpretatino of the fact. But the definition I used was inded that Doug used. I am not a liar.)

I AM NOT A LIAR. BE A MAN

SD