[SoothingDave]

So you're nto going to apologize? There's a surprise. Doug clearly said that any gambling for money was wrong. Life insurance, indisputably, is a gamble for money. That was the only point I was making.

All of which is completely irrelevant. I used Doug's definition. He says he didn't think he said it. You accused me of manufacturing the definition from spin.

Instead, I show exactly what he said, and lo and behold, it is exatly what I said he said.

If I am no longer allowed to use people's own words in a discussion with them, then I will leave.

An honest man would apologize for calling me a liar now. Are you an honest man? Is Doug? Did I or did I not use the very definition he gave me?

(The point of whether life insurance is a "Gamble" or nto is beside the point. That was my interpretatino of the fact. But the definition I used was inded that Doug used. I am not a liar.)

I AM NOT A LIAR. BE A MAN

SD

[OLD REGGIE]

Now see what you've started Doug?

BTW Dave, why did you take exception with me when I posted what you said? I was supposed to know what you meant!

(The point of whether life insurance is a "Gamble" or nto is beside the point. That was my interpretatino of the fact. But the definition I used was inded that Doug used. I am not a liar.)

I AM NOT A LIAR. BE A MAN

You are a