To: malakhi
The manner in which you are presenting these cases doesn't seem to be calling for justice but for vengance. There is a difference. The death penalty is in place to remove a menace to society from that society. It is not in place to seek vengance.
50,764 posted on
05/01/2003 7:59:03 AM PDT by
al_c
To: al_c
The manner in which you are presenting these cases doesn't seem to be calling for justice but for vengance. I disagree. How is 20 years served in prison for confessed murder "justice"? Justice implies some sort of balance between the crime and the punishment. For intentional homicide, the just punishment is death.
Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed (Genesis 9:6)
To: al_c
The manner in which you are presenting these cases doesn't seem to be calling for justice but for vengance. There is a difference. The death penalty is in place to remove a menace to society from that society. It is not in place to seek venganceI stand behind what I posted earlier but if I was on the jury, the guy that tortured and then murdered little Samantha might be an exception.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson