I'm guessing Havoc does, too. :-)
Speaking of carnal I think I must have hit on a very sensitive spot when I connected the pagan Easter ritual to the verse that strongly implies Jesus didn't come from Mary's egg. We all know how interconnected their many Marian doctrines are and that is why they are so defensive of each one of them. They have invented an equation that states it must be Mary's egg and at her consent that Jesus came therefore she is co-redemer. There certainly is a strong drive to glorify her and it certainly is not a drive that is in the scriptures.
No, you're just being idiotic.
We all know how interconnected their many Marian doctrines are and that is why they are so defensive of each one of them.
I know it's different from your method of having haphazard ideas that don't connect with, complement, or even agree with each other. It's a fault we have, having interconnected, coherent dogma.
They have invented an equation that states it must be Mary's egg and at her consent that Jesus came therefore she is co-redemer.
Wrong again. I have said numerous times that we don't know the machanics of how Jesus became man. So whether He used "her egg" or not doesn't matter.
I've said this many times, so what excuse do you have for sayign otherwise? Do you not understand the simple things I say, or are you eliberately lying?
The only, and I stress only, thing we hold as true is that Jesus used Mary's humanity to Incarnate as a man.
As for the co-redeemer idea somehow being a conclusion to the premise that Mary's egg was used, you are all wet. Wrong again, as usual.
Even if Mary was unrelated to Jesus, she still fulfilled her role in the Salvation history. She would still be co-redeemer.
you would think that with all the ignorant statements made here daily by you and Havoc and your ilk, that you would be embarrased. Instead, you still present yourselves as knowledgeable, and the cretins lap it up. It's sad.
SD