Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
The thing is Robby, that for me to understand and agree with you then I need to see the scripture supporting this. I have asked yall multiple times on different posts but no one will reply. We both believe in the Bible so that should be our common denominator. You "tradition" is as foreign to me as a Baptist doctrine would be to you. Can't we just stick to the Bible because both should be originated from scripture?
47,283 posted on 04/18/2003 10:11:09 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47279 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg
Can't we just stick to the Bible because both should be originated from scripture?

It sounds better to say "sacred tradition" rather than "There is no scripture to back it up".

47,284 posted on 04/18/2003 10:13:18 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47283 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
To us the Scriptures ARE tradition. Anyway, we are, after all, all looking backward at the events described in Scripture,and looking at them through the prisms of different "traditions."If one ignores or minimizes the infancy narratives in Matthew and Luke, then one has the modern Baptist Mary--a Mary who fits the Baptist tradition. If one puts a great deal of stress on them, the first two chapters of Luke and--I must add--the Cana story and the story of Mary at the Cross, then one has something like the Catholic Mary.
47,357 posted on 04/18/2003 5:26:25 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson