Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 51,961-51,98051,981-52,00052,001-52,020 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: CindyDawg
". . . Besides, generic ketchup is not bad. Too much sugar in the stuff though :')

Years ago I worked for a sweater mill. Their major customers were J C Penney, Sears, Montgomery Ward, and McGregor. (I think I remember correctly).

The exact same sweters were sold to each of the chains with the exception that sizes were more perfect for McGregor.

The McGregor sweaters, at retail, sold for nearly twice as much as at the "cheaper" stores.

Since that time I learned that many of the "branded" products are made at the same plant, with the same ingredients, samo samo, as the "store brands".

When shopping for food I always try the store brand at least once. If I don't like it, it is crossed off my list.

There are a few, very few, "store" products which aren't as good and some which are better than the "brands". Two examples:

Wheaties is my breakfast. Nothing else touches Wheaties.
Tomato Soup. The store brand, in my store at least, is much better than Campbells.

51,981 posted on 05/07/2003 6:29:23 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51934 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC; OLD REGGIE
Well. Let's see what Doug said in post 51590:

You can gamble without it being about money, but it becomes wrong when you gamble for money.

It becomes wrong when you gamble for money. That's what he said. I said to "Gamble with a financial payoff." I suppose you will now, rather than apologize, find some way that what I said was different.

You are flat out wrong Dave. The issue was about life insurance. My position is that life insurance isn't sinful because the person "betting" stands to gain absolutely nothing and thus isn't coveting anything, except perhaps a better life for his family after he's gone.

You redefined my position based on your own opinion, not mine.

Doug, I am disappointed in you. I expect Reggie to call me a liar no matter what, but I thought you would see.

What was your definition of the "sin." Didn't I quote it from you verbatim?

it becomes wrong when you gamble for money.

I said the exact same thing and you accused me of making something up. You called me a liar and I am not. you owe me an apology as well.

Perhaps I am not clear enough. You can disagree with me about whether life insurance is a form of gambling for money. But you can not disavow your definition that all gambling for money is wrong.

I see, clearly, that insurance is gambling for money, and I am not the only one. I then apply your definition and conclude that insurance is sinful.

So argue with me the facts of insurance, but do not tell me that you did not define "Gambling for money" as wrong. Don't call me a liar and don't join Reggie in accusing me of lying about this.

SD

51,982 posted on 05/07/2003 6:31:28 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51927 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
No it does not put it in perspective

Because you refuse to read what the writer wrote. And you know that you are ignoring the author's contextualization. This is fundamentally dishonest.

It's like I wrote a story about the greatest Steeler teams of the Cowher era and you accused me of leaving out the 1978 Super Bowl XIII champs.

Carry on, no serious person will bother to engage you.

SD

51,983 posted on 05/07/2003 6:34:19 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51980 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; Havoc
With all the evil in this world I would think you would be a basket case.

No comment.

SD

51,984 posted on 05/07/2003 6:35:17 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51931 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; newgeezer
Because you refuse to read what the writer wrote. And you know that you are ignoring the author's contextualization. This is fundamentally dishonest.

I'm screwing a prostitute and you refuse to listen to my 10 seconds of wife adoration. You are being fundamentally dishonest because you are ignoring the whoremongers contextualization.

51,985 posted on 05/07/2003 6:38:33 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51983 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; OLD REGGIE
Besides, generic ketchup is not bad. Too much sugar in the stuff though :')

Anathema!

The next time you go to a decent restaurant, take a look at the Heinz label for its point of origin. There is simply no other acceptable ketchup in these parts.

Reggie is right, though, that many store brands are near-indistinguishable from the famous brands. We use many such. But, some things are just non-negotiable. Peanut butter is another, my wife will only buy JIF.

SD

51,986 posted on 05/07/2003 6:39:36 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51934 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
I'm screwing a prostitute and you refuse to listen to my 10 seconds of wife adoration. You are being fundamentally dishonest because you are ignoring the whoremongers contextualization.

But what about Stallworth and Lambert? Weren't they great?

SD

51,987 posted on 05/07/2003 6:40:40 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51985 | View Replies]

To: Havoc; OLD REGGIE
Went and caught up with the doc last night. Doc says everything looks fine.

Well, that's good. My minions were too busy twisting Reggie's shoulder to make your rash more bothersome. LOL

SD

51,988 posted on 05/07/2003 6:44:17 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51964 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
talking about Armageddon

You mean the asteroid movie? I don't think I'd bother reading the story, it works better as a movie.

Of the two that came out that summer, Asteroid was the flahier flick (though Robert Duvall was a better character in the other movie). Go rent the movie.

SD

51,989 posted on 05/07/2003 6:48:01 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51968 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Change the subject, good idea since you've lost this one.
51,990 posted on 05/07/2003 6:49:14 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51987 | View Replies]

To: tHe AnTiLiB
I'm not going to lie Reggie...I said, I'm no historian...that was months ago...do you have to reach back that far to come up with an argument that has already been discussed.

I'm not going to lie Ant, once again I have no idea what post(s) you are referring to. I vaguely remember something about reaching back 9 days and calling it "short days ago". If I recall you said it was "weeks ago".

It appears you are now changing your "weeks" to "months". Tch, tch. According to your profile you are celebrating your one month anniversary on Free Republic today.

Do you have the same trouble with memory and numbers as you do with history?

I could suggest it would be good practice if you don't know the answer to something, don't invent one.

51,991 posted on 05/07/2003 6:54:04 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51954 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Change the subject, good idea since you've lost this one.

LOL. If you think I was changing the subject, you really do not get it.

Others may explain it to you.

51,992 posted on 05/07/2003 6:56:58 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51990 | View Replies]

To: tHe AnTiLiB
(Reg) "Couldn't be because it would then be on their own time and they wouldn't be getting paid for it?????"

What time Reggie? What money? A priest spends his time in service to God for little money. Probably the amount you get for Social Security. Maybe I just don't spend my life infront of a computer. Wait, hear is the Bapstist comeback...for the priest scandal...they weren't priests in the first place. Don't even try to ressurect the scandal, remeber Jimmy Baker...and Swaggert...with the prostitute...we are all human.

Does it matter to you that I never mentioned, or even hinted, that I was talking about Priests? I was speaking of the posters on this forum only. Are you a Priest?

Why in the world would you ring in unrelated trash like this?

51,993 posted on 05/07/2003 7:06:38 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51957 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
The Dallas Morning News has recently been reporting on the number of sex offenses by school teachers , more than 600 cases in which the districts covered the offenses and passed the offenders on to other school districts. For some reason this has not made the national publications, although what is true in Texas, it probably is true elsewhere. Maybe when someone sues a district for $100 million and wins?

What's your point? Are you claiming the institutional coverup by the RCC hierarchy is ok? That it should be ignored? That the RCC should be held to the same moral standards as the general public?
51,994 posted on 05/07/2003 7:15:34 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51963 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
What's your point? Are you claiming the institutional coverup by the RCC hierarchy is ok? That it should be ignored? That the RCC should be held to the same moral standards as the general public?

Who peed in your Wheaties? Do they even make generic Wheaties? I've never seen any.

The point is not to claim that such behavior is "OK" (and you know better than that.) The point is that we need to see how the media plays up this same exact failure among the schools, who are the darlings of the media versus how they played it against the Church, whom they generally despise.

You should examine why you react in this way. Why don't you take a portion of your vitriol and direct it at the schools who seemed to do the same thing, instead of firing more at the Catholics?

SD

51,995 posted on 05/07/2003 7:21:04 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51994 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
You should examine why you react in this way. Why don't you take a portion of your vitriol and direct it at the schools who seemed to do the same thing, instead of firing more at the Catholics?

OK, I'll direct 100% at the schools. Let's see 100*0. Hmmmmmmmmmm. Doesn't work.
51,996 posted on 05/07/2003 7:30:08 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51995 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
I'm actually a big SF fan; but, I usually watch or listen rather than reading. Most of my reading time is spent in scripture or History and Archeology volumes. Once in a while I'll read something new from Anne Rice or Grisham nowdays though.
51,997 posted on 05/07/2003 7:38:23 AM PDT by Havoc (If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51968 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Well, obviously, schools need to end teacher abstinence and allow them to be married. The students should petition the administrators about this. ;o)
51,998 posted on 05/07/2003 7:42:12 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51963 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; malakhi; Invincibly Ignorant
Looks like the Mavs are back to their usual selves. Kings will take this one in 5.
51,999 posted on 05/07/2003 7:43:16 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51998 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
How would you know if Jesus apeared to you?

Actually, I wouldn't. But then, I'm not looking for JESUS to appear to me.
Matthew 24:23 Then if anyone says to you, 'Look! Here is the Messiah!'e or 'There he is!'--do not believe it.

24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and produce great signs and omens, to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.

25 Take note, I have told you beforehand.

26 So, if they say to you, 'Look! He is in the wilderness,' do not go out. If they say, 'Look! He is in the inner rooms,' do not believe it.

27 For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.

52,000 posted on 05/07/2003 7:43:28 AM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51979 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 51,961-51,98051,981-52,00052,001-52,020 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson