Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 51,821-51,84051,841-51,86051,861-51,880 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
God also said to Moses, "Say this to the people of Israel, `YHWH, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you': this is my name for ever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all generations. (Exodus 3:15)

51,841 posted on 05/06/2003 1:10:46 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51836 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
We do, just not like Steven thinks we do. :) The Holy Spirit that lives in us will move us to fulfill the spirit of the law not the letter of the law.

The prophet Joel says the Spirit will turn our hearts of stone into hearts of flesh and write the laws (torah) on our hearts. I don't where it says the Spirit will change the content.

51,842 posted on 05/06/2003 1:11:47 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51835 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; DouglasKC
Did I invent a definition or did I use the one Doug put forth?

You owe me an apology for saying I "spun" my way to a definition, when I have shown that I did no such thing.

A man would apologize. What are you?


(Dave said) What a crowd. I only have one question for y'all. Would you begrudge the Church if it took an equal amount of money from the proceeds of the man's life insurance?

(Douglas replied) I would say that taking life insurance out for yourself is never a matter of personal greed or covetness because if you "win" you don't get the money anyways.

You insisted Life Insurance is a gamble and framed the entire question around your personal framework. So like you to set the rules.

No apology from me and it is useless for you to beg. Furthermore, I wouldn't ask you to apologize because I have no confidence in your sincerity. Ever!

BTW, I would have answered sooner except I had to go take physical therapy for my latest episode. I am getting tired of my opportunities for sanctification. Wanna swap places?

51,843 posted on 05/06/2003 1:13:39 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51773 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
I know that. You know that. Others don't agree.

Well, let us consider your agruments about the phasing out of sacrifices. That they were a temporary thing until mankind learned to offer the true sacrifice of a repentent and contrite heart.

I see no reason why the dietary laws are not in a similar category. In the NT, Jesus does teach that it is what comes out of a man's mouth rather than what goes in to it that makes him clean or unclean. The special dietary practices are an external thing, that pales in cmparison to an authentic renewal inside. One could be holy and eat pork, or sinful and avoid it. The outward sign's time has passed.

The other main item would be Sunday worship, and we have covered this before as well. I am following my authority and celebrating the New Creation, not he rest from the old.

SD

51,844 posted on 05/06/2003 1:14:38 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51840 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
I disagree with dispensationalists however that the age of law is confined to the OT and the age of grace is confined to the NT.

Really? :)

Lol. Well, if you're gonna call yourself a dispensationalist you should know this. :-)

51,845 posted on 05/06/2003 1:15:32 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51836 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
What is the difference between fulfilling the spirit of the law vs. the letter of the law? Can one fulfil the spirit of the law even if he disobeys the letter of the law?

No one could keep the law without failing, thats the reason we can't get to heaven on our own, we sin, sin cannot be in the presence of God, therefore our need for a sin bearer, Jesus. Its a done deal, the Holy Spirit works in us now to fufill the Spirit of the law, and the Spirit of the law is a far higher plain than the letter of the law, but we are not saved because we let the Spirit move in our lifes, we still sin, the price He paid is a one time time thing.

BigMack

51,846 posted on 05/06/2003 1:17:45 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51839 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
You insisted Life Insurance is a gamble and framed the entire question around your personal framework. So like you to set the rules.

Life insurance is a gamble. Absolutely.

I was using my interpretation of that fact and Doug's definition of gambling for money being wrong.

You accused me of making up his definition. I did no such thing. Apologize.

I don't mind you calling me a spinner when I do something complicated. But when I am just relaying what another said, don't you dare call me a liar.

SD

51,847 posted on 05/06/2003 1:18:08 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51843 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
I know that. You know that. Others don't agree.

I agree.

BigMack

51,848 posted on 05/06/2003 1:19:11 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51840 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
In the NT, Jesus does teach that it is what comes out of a man's mouth rather than what goes in to it that makes him clean or unclean.

and then He added, I was just kidding when I wrote the Torah. :-)

For the sake of argument, assuming that the Catholic church was given ;the authority it claims it has, I would still think they overstepped their bounds to change one of the 10 commandments.

51,849 posted on 05/06/2003 1:19:36 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51844 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
No problem here.

BigMack
51,850 posted on 05/06/2003 1:21:32 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51841 | View Replies]

Is there anyone else here who can not see how clearly life insurance is a gamble?

Anyone?

You pay money periodically. If a defined event occurs, you get a large payment.

If you were sure that you would not die for a certain period, you could take the monthly payment and invest it somewhere else and make some money with it. As Mack tells us, over 30 years you could make a bundle with modest monthly payments.

But here's the catch. If you die before the 30 years are up, you are left only with your accumulated value of you alternative investment. If you want a guarantee of a certain payment, no matter when you die, you have to buy insurance.

When you do so, the insurance company is taking a risk that you will die before your payments and interest add up to enough to pay your settlement. Perversely, you are betting that you will die before that is the case.

How can anyone say this is not a financial wager?

SD

51,851 posted on 05/06/2003 1:23:45 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51847 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
No one could keep the law without failing,

Not even Jesus. Of all the 613 mitzvot? He failed to keep those pertaining to females. :-)

51,852 posted on 05/06/2003 1:24:23 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51846 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
They didn't "change" a commandment, they just shifted its observance.

SD

51,853 posted on 05/06/2003 1:24:49 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51849 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
the insurance company is taking a risk that you will die before your payments and interest add up to enough to pay your settlement

After. Duh.

SD

51,854 posted on 05/06/2003 1:26:01 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51851 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
They didn't "change" a commandment, they just shifted its observance.

Its not a Sabbath. The 7th day is the Sabbath. When the new heavens and new earth arrive we will be celebrating Sabbath eternally. As defined in the OT.

Isaiah :6622 For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.

23 And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD.

51,855 posted on 05/06/2003 1:29:47 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51853 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Not even Jesus. Of all the 613 mitzvot? He failed to keep those pertaining to females. :-)

:)

BigMack
51,856 posted on 05/06/2003 1:31:02 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51852 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
When the new heavens and new earth arrive we will be celebrating Sabbath eternally. As defined in the OT.

And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD.

This says nothing about "celebrating Sabbath eternally." It does say that we will worship eternally, but that is it.

I don't have a problem with that.

SD

51,857 posted on 05/06/2003 1:34:12 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51855 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; JHavard; ventana; RobbyS
(SD) Where is your rebuke of Jim for being a patronizing snob in ipso facto finding every Catholic who makes a gesture insincere in their hearts?

(Reg) You would be taken much more seriously in your efforts if you were even the slightest bit fair in your assessments honest.

(SweetDave) Bullshit. You just are completely unable to see the ugliness of some of the non-Catholics here.

I know that actually quoting their words means nothing to you, you call me a liar anyway, but here is what Jim said in 51605:

Note: I will use bold red to add the assumed words in Jim's statements.

(JH) I can relate to these feelings, that's how we feel when we see all RC's, wasting time doing all those man made rituals and traditions that have no biblical support, when you could be spending quality time directly with God.

Where is his qualification here? Nowhere, that's where. He is not saying "some" Catholics do this. He says, authoritatvely, that "RCs" "waste their time" with gestures and stuff that isn't Biblical. And then, he counters this to "spending quality time" with God. As if all of the above, that the blanket "RCs" do has nothing to do with spending time with God.

(JH) I would probably die spiritually in your Church, as so might you in mine, but since God only sees the inner man, and not the outward appearance, I’m sure that the large percentage of what you do in your Church that doesn’t come from the heart, God doesn’t see any way.

This is only "certian" Catholics, and he just forgot to say so, right?

Yes! In fact it was a personal reply to ventana and RobbyS.

In any event how did you miss the qualifier "that doesn't come from the heart"?

You disgust me.

Thank you. I pity you.

51,858 posted on 05/06/2003 1:34:38 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51853 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Even Catholics admit its not a Sabbath.

The Catholic Press of Sydney, Australia, is empatic that Sunday observance is solely of Catholic origin.

"sunday is a Catholic institution, and its claims to observance can be defended only on Catholic principles...From beginning to end of Scripture there is not a single passage that warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to the first." 8/25/1900.

51,859 posted on 05/06/2003 1:35:36 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51854 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
perpetual covenant

Exodus 31:16 Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the sabbath, to observe the sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant.

You're not gonna tell me only jews will celebrate Sabbath in heaven?

51,860 posted on 05/06/2003 1:39:50 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant (Hows my posting? Call 1-800-Matthew 1:24 & 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51857 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 51,821-51,84051,841-51,86051,861-51,880 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson