Replies

Did I invent a definition or did I use the one Doug put forth?

You owe me an apology for saying I "spun" my way to a definition, when I have shown that I did no such thing.

A man would apologize. What are you?

(Dave said) What a crowd. I only have one question for y'all. Would you begrudge the Church if it took an equal amount of money from the proceeds of the man's life insurance?

(Douglas replied) I would say that taking life insurance out for yourself is never a matter of personal greed or covetness because if you "win" you don't get the money anyways.

You insisted Life Insurance is a gamble and framed the entire question around your personal framework. So like you to set the rules.

No apology from me and it is useless for you to beg. Furthermore, I wouldn't ask you to apologize because I have no confidence in your sincerity. Ever!

BTW, I would have answered sooner except I had to go take physical therapy for my latest episode. I am getting tired of my opportunities for sanctification. Wanna swap places?

You insisted Life Insurance is a gamble and framed the entire question around your personal framework. So like you to set the rules.

Life insurance is a gamble. Absolutely.

I was using my interpretation of that fact and Doug's definition of gambling for money being wrong.

You accused me of making up his definition. I did no such thing. Apologize.

I don't mind you calling me a spinner when I do something complicated. But when I am just relaying what another said, don't you dare call me a liar.