Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 46,901-46,92046,921-46,94046,941-46,960 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: SoothingDave; Invincibly Ignorant
"...and they shall be one flesh"

You think, perhaps, that this is a sexual reference? Grow up.

You think this is not a sexual reference.

OK Slick Willie. You win.

46,921 posted on 04/15/2003 1:28:48 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a cult of one? UNITARJEWMIAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46805 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; SoothingDave; newgeezer; ksen
Heb 7:3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.

Jesus has no mother spiritually and typically. This shows that the whole idea and title of "Mother of God" is anti-scriptural. Being like the Son of God means that you have no mother.

46,922 posted on 04/15/2003 1:35:25 PM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46919 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; newgeezer
Please refer me to any Biblical citation where anyone other than Jesus is referred to as a child of Mary.

It's in the book that references the Immaculate Conception and Bodily Assumption. Did you miss it?
46,923 posted on 04/15/2003 1:36:56 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a cult of one? UNITARJEWMIAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46827 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
OK Slick Willie. You win.

Thanks Reggie. I now have an image of Joseph in my mind, shaking his finger and saying "I did not have sex with that woman..."

46,924 posted on 04/15/2003 1:37:10 PM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46921 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Being like the Son of God means that you have no mother.

You are the sons of the LORD your God; you shall not cut yourselves or make any baldness on your foreheads for the dead. (Deuteronomy 14:1)

For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. (Romans 8:14)

Whole lotta people without moms out there.

46,925 posted on 04/15/2003 1:39:58 PM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46922 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
This shows that the whole idea and title of "Mother of God" is anti-scriptural.

When did Jesus become God?

SD

46,926 posted on 04/15/2003 1:42:19 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46922 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Becky, do you remember what I posted last week, about viewing Jesus's death as an act of reconciling the world with God, rather than as one of atoning for sin? Check this out.
... that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. (2 Corinthians 5:19)
I don't wish to intrude, but ... could not JESUS' death have effected both results (i.e. reconciling the world to God ... and ... atoning for sin) ?

In fact, ... does not the verse you referenced indicate this ... ?
... that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. (2 Corinthians 5:19)

46,927 posted on 04/15/2003 2:01:41 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46911 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; SoothingDave; al_c; OLD REGGIE; Invincibly Ignorant
Here it comes! We just dropped 32o -- from 84o to 52o -- in the past 15 minutes. The air conditioning was on all day in the office, and now the heat has kicked on.
46,928 posted on 04/15/2003 2:14:50 PM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46925 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
We just dropped 32o -- from 84o to 52o -- in the past 15 minutes. The air conditioning was on all day in the office, and now the heat has kicked on.

Better you than me. We were supposed to hit 82 today, it was high 70s yesterday. Should be nice all week, then rain for Easter.

SD

46,929 posted on 04/15/2003 2:17:47 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46928 | View Replies]

To: Quester
In fact, ... does not the verse you referenced indicate this ... ?

I would distinguish between the forgiveness of sin and the atonement for sin. Consider my #2 hobbyhorse scripture passage.

The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself. (Ezekiel 18:20)

Clear and to the point. How can you reconcile the plain meaning of this passage with the belief that Jesus's death in some way atoned for the sins of mankind?

46,930 posted on 04/15/2003 2:39:37 PM PDT by malakhi (fundamentalist unitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46927 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself. (Ezekiel 18:20)

Clear and to the point. How can you reconcile the plain meaning of this passage with the belief that Jesus's death in some way atoned for the sins of mankind?

Maybe the "himself" is a reference to Jesus. So the righteousness that any of us has is from "himself" and the wickedness was upon "himself."

SD

46,931 posted on 04/15/2003 2:44:16 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46930 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself. (Ezekiel 18:20)

Isaiah says our righteousness is as filthy rags. So who's Ezekiel referring to as "righteous"?

46,932 posted on 04/15/2003 2:47:32 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46931 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; Quester
Sorry I missed this post, I was busy with another poster:).

Anyway, yes that is a good verse. I also read questers response to your post. What do you think of that?

Becky

46,933 posted on 04/15/2003 2:59:01 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46911 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself. (Ezekiel 18:20)

Clear and to the point. How can you reconcile the plain meaning of this passage with the belief that Jesus's death in some way atoned for the sins of mankind?

Malakhi ... this proclamation of God through Ezekiel was given in response to the Israelite complaint that they were being punished, not for their own sins, but for their father's sins.
Ezekiel 18:1 The word of the LORD came unto me again, saying,

2 What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?

3 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel.

4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
It is my contention that, in verse 4, as in verse 20 (wich you referenced), God sets forth His justice.

I.e. ... every man/woman is responsible for their own sins. God will not punish me for yours, ... nor will He punish you for mine.

God is very clear here ... almost brutally so ...
All souls are Mine (i.e. to do with what I will) ... and ...

... the soul that sins shall die.
With this revelation, there seems to be no way out for us ... for who among us has not sinned ?

But ... God, because of His love for us, chose to (per His Word) temper His justice with mercy (as a judge/politician may grant a stay of execution).

God declared a method for the remission (taking away) of sin ... sacrifice.

The Israelites practiced animal sacrifice ... as they had been instructed by God.

But, ... later in scripture it is revealed that the blood of animals is insufficient to take away sins.
Hebrews 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
King David was enlightened with as much in Psalms 51 ... where he cries out for forgiveness for his sins concerning Bathsheba ...
Psalm 51:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David, when Nathan the prophet came unto him, after he had gone in to Bathsheba. Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions.

2 Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.

3 For I acknowledge my transgressions: and my sin is ever before me.

4 Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest.
...
Psalms 51:16 For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering.

17 The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.
So, we needed a sacrifice ... but, of one like us, ... except perfect in every way (as was required of a sacrifice).

So JESUS came and gave His life for ours ... the just for the unjust ... that we might be reconciled to God and have eternal life with Him.

To summarize ... God's justice (through Ezekiel) said ... However, God's mercy said ...
... but , I love you ... I want to save you ... therefore, ... I will temper my justice with mercy ... I will accept a perfect sacrifice to take away your sins ... not only that ... but ... I will provide it.
That sacrifice has been made ... our sins have been taken away ... it is only up to us to accept this great gift ... and live.

46,934 posted on 04/15/2003 3:51:06 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46930 | View Replies]

To: malakhi; SoothingDave; Invincibly Ignorant; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; DouglasKC; Quester
malakhi; SoothingDave;Invincibly Ignorant ;PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain;DouglasKC ;Quester

This Thursday is the 15th of Nisan on the Levitical calendar. It is the first day of Passover.
This Sunday is the day after the Sabbath following the beginning of Passover . It is the Feast of First Fruits.

The Christ was sacrificed as our Passover Lamb for our sins.
He rose from the grave in order to be our First Fruits offering to Abba.

Easter and Passover have aligned this year and the previous two years
i.e. they have aligned for three years in a row.

Passover and First Fruits are what was celebrated by Christians until 325 AD when at the Council at Nice,
the Corporate Church separated Easter and Passover for what they hoped would be forever.

Since the Council of Nice, they only align every 19 years

The Metonic cycle of 19 years has twelve years of 12 months and seven years of 13 months


I think the L-rd is reminding the Jews tha
t the Mashiach has come and His Name is Y'shua.

I think the L-rd is sending a message to the "Replacement" Christians that His brothers are the Jews.

Matthew 23:39 For I tell you, you will not see me again until you say,
`Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.'" [Psalm 118:26]


Barukh haba b'Shem Adonai
Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord
Y'shua HaMashiach

chuck <truth@YeshuaHaMashiach>

46,935 posted on 04/15/2003 4:22:13 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46860 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Hebrews is comparing Jesus with Melchizidek and comntrasting both with the Levite priesthood. Mary does not even come into the picture.
46,936 posted on 04/15/2003 4:42:51 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46922 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
The Greek word translated "until" does not imply normal marital conduct after Jesus' birth, nor does it exclude it.

Yes, that is exactly right, which is why the footnote is there. Thanks for quoting it. The use of "till" does not either imply or exclude. We must look to other evidence, as this is not conclusive.

You can certainly read it the Protestant way if you want to. But it is not cut-and-dried that that is what it means.

SD

46,920 posted on 04/15/2003 2:28 PM MDT by SoothingDave

I think you need to study the Koine Greek, Dave.

The word translated Until based on the Grammar should say While as in during the pregnancy.

The word means While when used with the indicative verb GSN-1097 (to know)

Acts 17:11 Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the
Thessalonians, for they received the message with great
eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if
what Paul said was true.

chuck <truth@YeshuaHaMashiach>

46,937 posted on 04/15/2003 4:54:36 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46920 | View Replies]

To: ksen
You guys think we could debate the mormons with out all the name calling and the pulled posts?

Have you met "what's-his-name"? I almost cuss at him on completely non-religious threads. Add in a good cult (if only sociologically so) topic and I'd be insulting until the sun went down.

46,938 posted on 04/15/2003 7:55:45 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46737 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
You think, perhaps, that this is a sexual reference? Grow up.

Do you think sex is not involved in the intimacy of a husband and wife? Do you think it is not part of "one flesh"? Grow up.

46,939 posted on 04/15/2003 8:01:00 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46805 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
So Paul apparently had different ideas about the Law than Jesus did. Some people might find that significant.

Paul and Jesus address different situations and different groups of people. This does not mean that their ideas were divergent. If I was addressing a group of American teenagers, I would tend to address different subject from different perspectives than if I was addressing Italian grandparents (if I wished to be relevant to and heard by my audience).

46,940 posted on 04/15/2003 8:08:06 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46875 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 46,901-46,92046,921-46,94046,941-46,960 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson