[Frumious Bandersnatch]

There is still controversy about the parameters of such experiments.  It's a lot like weather models which predict global warming, but can't even predict past weather accurately.

It doesn't matter about the results either, the end result was because of design.  In order to get more unbiased results, the experimenters will have to observe it naturally in action.  And even that won't disprove the validity of ID.

[Gargantua]

Teaching "Evolution" is teaching religion.

It is the teaching of a belief structure absent any provably defined model. Having faith in "Evolution" is no different than having faith in God, with the sole exception that God exists, and Evolution does not.

[Virginia-American]

And even that won't disprove the validity of ID.

What would?

[Virginia-American]

In order to get more unbiased results, the experimenters will have to observe it naturally in action.

The under-the-ice exploration of Callisto (and perhaps other moons of Jupiter or Saturn) should be very interseting in this regard.