Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fidelis

“No, there is no punctuation in the original Hebrew”

I’m afraid you’ll have to do better than that, since there are two subjects, two objects, two verbs, so there are clearly two sentences giving two prohibitions even if we didn’t have the punctuation to clue us in on that.


35 posted on 08/21/2024 12:04:12 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
“No, there is no punctuation in the original Hebrew”
I’m afraid you’ll have to do better than that, since there are two subjects, two objects, two verbs, so there are clearly two sentences giving two prohibitions even if we didn’t have the punctuation to clue us in on that.

That would be true in contemporary rules of grammar, but in what is essentially one large run-on sentence in an ancient text, it is not so clear-cut and translators do the best they can. Without punctuation in the original, it is not at all certain that what we have here is two sentences.

37 posted on 08/21/2024 12:28:42 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson