Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

A technique so new and amazing that nobody else has used it... Interesting. Carbon dating works. X-ray Hocus Pocus doesn’t.


8 posted on 08/19/2024 6:59:18 PM PDT by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jerod

Don’t believe it. You are wrong. The carbon-14 dating took a piece of the resown part of the cloth. This Shroud IS the burial cloth of Jesus Christ.


16 posted on 08/19/2024 7:12:16 PM PDT by alstewartfan (Child slavery, rape and drug OD's mean nothing to Roberts and Barrett. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jerod

Carbon dating works if the sample is not contaminated. The shroud sample that was taken for radio carbon dating was contaminated with cotton and other and gum dye mordant.

see http://www.shroud.it/ROGERS-3.PDF


36 posted on 08/19/2024 7:50:16 PM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jerod
Carbon dating works. X-ray Hocus Pocus doesn’t.

Carbon dating doesn’t work when the object being dated went through a fire, including being scorched and exposed to heavy wood smoke. The shroud would carbon date to a more recent date than actual because of that fire.

54 posted on 08/19/2024 8:49:46 PM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jerod
You're an idiot.

They were supposed to take samples for the radiocarbon dating anywhere but where they did.

They chose a portion of the Shroud which had been repaired with newer cloth using a sewing tecnique called "French Invisible Reweaving" in which the proportion of original cloth to new fibers tapers off.

The three samples used for radiocarbon dating were all taken at different depths of the repaired swatch, so they each had a different proportion of new and old threads.

The giveaway was that the ages given for each of those three samples (each done at a different lab), were all outside each others' error bars, a dead giveaway for systematic experimental error; in this case, the samples were materially different.

61 posted on 08/19/2024 9:40:45 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jerod

Carbon dating is in fact not accurate as carbon decay is related to cycles of the sins radiation which fluctuats


80 posted on 08/20/2024 5:47:40 AM PDT by stockpirate (A group of baboons is referred to as a "Congress" of baboons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jerod
Carbon dating works for stuff that has been buried or otherwise sealed away for 2000 years. This has not been sealed up, and in particular was damaged by a fire in 1532 and subsequently repaired. Not to mention that it's been contaminated by handling and exposure, etc.

The X-ray technique, called WAXS, uses X-rays to measure the degradation of the linen fibers over time. It's not "hocus pocus".

90 posted on 08/20/2024 9:15:24 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson