Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge upholds Missouri abortion ban amid ‘religious freedom’ challenge from faith leaders
Christian Post ^ | June 17, 2024 | Anugrah Kumar

Posted on 06/17/2024 10:12:34 PM PDT by Morgana

A Missouri circuit judge has ruled against several clergy members who argued that the state's abortion laws infringe on the Missouri Constitution's Establishment Clause. The lawsuit, led by a diverse group of faith leaders, was met with a dismissal.

The challenge, initiated in January 2023 by representatives from Christian, Jewish and Unitarian congregations, was spearheaded by advocacy groups, including Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the National Women's Law Center.

They sought an injunction to halt Missouri's abortion laws, which lack exceptions even in cases of rape or incest, arguing these laws violate constitutional provisions against the merging of church and state.

St. Louis Circuit Judge Jason Sengheiser issued an order on Friday in favor of the state, maintaining that the abortion restrictions do not prevent anyone from practicing their faith freely.

Sengheiser wrote that while the belief life begins at conception is sometimes a religious belief and may run counter to others' religious beliefs, it is not only a religious belief. He pointed to the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, which overturned the court's 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that made abortion a national right.

"The Court finds that the restrictions in the ban are consistent with Missouri's historical criminalization of and restrictions of abortion," the judge wrote. "Essentially, the only that changed is that Roe was reversed, opening the door to this further regulation. Dobbs provided in part that the State has an 'interest in protecting prenatal life' even 'before viability.' The Total Abortion Ban is consistent with this interest and a result of the holding in Dobbs."

The legal representatives for the clergy, including civil rights lawyer Denise Lieberman and the team at Arnold & Porter, expressed their disagreement with the verdict.

"Missouri's abortion ban is a direct attack on the separation of church and state, religious freedom and reproductive freedom," they said in a statement released through the Americans United for Separation of Church and State. "Missouri lawmakers made clear that they were imposing their personal religious beliefs on all Missourians when they enacted these laws. We remain committed to restoring abortion access in Missouri."

House Bill 126, often referred to as the "Missouri Stands for the Unborn Act," includes multiple provisions to restrict abortion access. It also bans abortions at various stages of pregnancy, depending on specific circumstances. House Bill 126 included a "trigger ban" on abortions, which was enacted following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Senate Bill 5 increases regulations on abortion providers, imposes additional health and safety requirements and enhances the state's ability to enforce abortion laws.

The plaintiffs included Rev. Traci Blackmon, the former associate general minister for justice and local church ministries for the United Churches of Christ, and 13 other faith leaders from seven different denominations.

They believe that the insertion of religious language into the legislative process contravenes the state constitution. They objected to one section of the statute that reads: "In recognition that Almighty God is the author of life, that all men and women are 'endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among those are Life."

However, Sengheiser noted that similar language can be found in the preamble to the Missouri Constitution, which expresses "profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe." He contends that the rest of the abortion law doesn't contain any other religious language.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey's office defended the legislation, saying the religious convictions of individual lawmakers do not equate to a constitutional violation.

"Today is a major win for women and their unborn children as a Missouri court sided with our office yet again in our efforts to defend the sanctity of life," he said in a statement. "Having lost a child, this issue is personal for me. My office will continue to use every tool at its disposal to protect the unborn. Our children are worth the fight."

Last month, Missouri passed a law stopping public funds like Medicaid from going to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers. Gov. Mike Parson signed House Bill 2634 into law, which makes it "unlawful for any public funds to be expended to any abortion facility, or to any affiliate of such abortion facility."


TOPICS: Judaism; Moral Issues; Other Christian; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; jews; missorui; plannedparenthood; prolife; unitarian

1 posted on 06/17/2024 10:12:34 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

bookmark.


2 posted on 06/17/2024 10:15:56 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Good.


3 posted on 06/18/2024 2:27:54 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Welcome to the Matrix . Orwell's "1984" was a warning, not an instruction manual. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Great news!


4 posted on 06/18/2024 2:30:05 AM PDT by Trump_Triumphant ("They recognized Him in the breaking of the Bread”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Great news!


5 posted on 06/18/2024 2:30:07 AM PDT by Trump_Triumphant ("They recognized Him in the breaking of the Bread”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Great news!


6 posted on 06/18/2024 2:30:13 AM PDT by Trump_Triumphant ("They recognized Him in the breaking of the Bread”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Man, we really are on bizarro world, aren’t we?


7 posted on 06/18/2024 2:57:15 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
0.05% of abortions performed were due to incest or rape. Thats 5/10,000.

These people really are backing he devil to push those odds as the reason why abortion needs to be free and open for everyone.

Here in the U.S., God has left the building.

dont ask for my source. Look it up yourself, it's time people learn to do their own research instead of believing whatever someone tells them.

There is no use in entering a battle without preparing to do battle.

8 posted on 06/18/2024 3:13:39 AM PDT by Ikeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

These aren’t “faith groups,” not by a mile.


9 posted on 06/18/2024 3:39:59 AM PDT by fwdude ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ikeon

It is not just to kill a baby because one of his parents sinned.


10 posted on 06/18/2024 4:45:48 AM PDT by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
These aren’t “faith groups,” not by a mile.

Their purpose is to subvert religion.

11 posted on 06/18/2024 4:47:04 AM PDT by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What do abortion restrictions have to do with religion and church and state?

Christians also believe in Do Not Kill and Do Not Steal. Do these atheist twits think there should be no restrictions on murder and theft?

EC


12 posted on 06/18/2024 6:37:47 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson