Why my Priest bit a woman and denied her communion this week

Blue Collar Catholic ^ | May 23, 2024 | Blue Collar Catholic

[Morgana]

A member of St. Thomas Aquinas Catholic Church tells what really happened in this video and why the Priest was in the right to do what he did!!

From the video:

"...secular news they said the police recommended that the father be charged with battery for biting this woman um I can tell you according to the police and I have friends in the police department uh no they think the church should actually Char uh they the woman should actually be charged for attempted robbery and I'll explain why..."

ALSO: "...he protected the Eucharist that's the duty of the priest and and she's seen pushing him so if anyone assaulted anyone it was her and in the State of Florida we have a stand your ground rule law so he's totally innocent you know any legality but I want to get to the moral issue here in a minute so..."

These are from the Transcripts of the show

[FamiliarFace]

This from yesterday’s posting.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/4239925/posts

[Steve_Seattle]

I watched about five or six minutes of the video, and he explains that the woman was - for some unexplained reason - denied communion at a 10 a.m. Sunday mass. Then, she came back to the noon Mass and grabbed a bunch of hosts from the priest’s chalice or ciborium as he was dispensing them to communicants. She then began to crumble the hosts. Since both of his hands were full, the priest bit the woman in the hand to try to stop her.

[Morgana]

Yes thanks.. It’s an update and from someone in that church and knows that priest.

He did a video two hours ago and here it is...

“Important Update on my Priest who bit a woman.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gW0U0Gky2I

[bigbob]

Major Biden defense?

[Morgana]

She reach out and tried to grab a whole bunch of them. She could be charged with theft. He had the right to stop her and Florida does have “Stand your Ground” laws! Father stood his ground.

[TexasGator]

” in the State of Florida we have a stand your ground rule law”

Correct but does not apply for property.

[TexasGator]

” ... and Florida does have “Stand your Ground” laws! Father stood his ground.”

You don’t understand Florida law.

[Delta 21]

Its a dog eat dog world!

[Delta 21]

Other than throwing her in prison to rot or feeding her to the gators what is there to do.

SHAMING doesnt seem to work any more and stoning is illegal.

[TexasGator]

Lousy digital enhancements!

[rollo tomasi]

<"...she's seen pushing him so if anyone assaulted anyone it was her and in the State of Florida..."

776.013 Home protection; use or threatened use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.— (1) A person who is in a dwelling or residence in which the person has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and use or threaten to use:

(a) Nondeadly force against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force; or

(b) Deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony.

(2) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using or threatening to use defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used or threatened was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and

(b) The person who uses or threatens to use defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

(3) The presumption set forth in subsection (2) does not apply if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used or threatened has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or

(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used or threatened; or

(c) The person who uses or threatens to use defensive force is engaged in a criminal activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further a criminal activity; or

(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used or threatened is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using or threatening to use force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.

(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.

(5) As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.

(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.

(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-27; s. 4, ch. 2014-195; s. 1, ch. 2017-77. Copyright © 1995-2024 The Florida Legislature

[TexasGator]

From the Diocese statement:

Father Rodriguez bit her hand so she would let go of the hosts she grabbed,” the statement continued.

[rollo tomasi]

To get the host meant an act of force and intent that intruded upon the rights of the Preist. I would of just decked her instead of biting her but whatever.

[Morgana]

Could she be demon possessed?

[TexasGator]

“To get the host meant an act of force and intent that intruded upon the rights of the Preist.”

And the “stand your ground” law does not apply.

[NorthMountain]

And the “stand your ground” law does not apply.

This is a case for jury nullification. I would acquit regardless of the facts or of the law.

[Lazamataz]

The Host is not property. This is considered the BODY OF CHRIST.

And since Christ is a PERSON and this is His BODY, Stand Your Ground laws apply.

[Dr. Sivana]

he explains that the woman was - for some unexplained reason - denied communion at a 10 a.m. Sunday mass.

The woman in question has made a big deal out of being a lesbian. She said she "wanted a cookie". She also stated that she thought he clothing may have been the reason for the Communion denial.

Father asked her if she had been to Confession (after asking some other questions that may not be our business). She said no. He judged her to not be a Catholic in a state to receive Communion by her own words and likely a public sinner.

BTW, I am an usher at my church. two of us stnd on opposite ends of the Communion rail during the Reception of the Faithful, prepared to assist if anyone makes a problem. More churches might want to consider that.

[rollo tomasi]

The turbo lesbo bitch used unlawful force thus (a) applies to that Preist’s actions for justifiable use of force under the State of Florida (Chapter 776: Justifiable use of Force). You can also make the argument of resident/dwelling as well.