Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

Otherwise, why make the distinction? Why point out that it was OT as if it weren’t good enough, or subservient to NT Scripture?


Why point it out?

Because it is worthy of thought. It is the scripture they had. And we need to consider that.

You also need to do some introspections. That I post a simple fact and you are offended says a lot about you. Almost like liberals who are perpetually offended.


441 posted on 05/20/2024 7:40:25 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]


To: PeterPrinciple

I am not offended. Get over yourself.

You’re projecting too much if you can presume to know what I’m thinking.

When more than one person reads something that you posted in a certain way, it’s not everyone else with the communication problem.


444 posted on 05/20/2024 7:52:17 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

To: PeterPrinciple; wita
Because it is worthy of thought. It is the scripture they had. And we need to consider that.

Sounds quite Mormon.

They, too, insist that the STH was good enough BEFORE J.Smith, but NOW it needs updating by the Book of Mormon, and Doctrines&Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.

452 posted on 05/20/2024 1:09:19 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson