Otherwise, why make the distinction? Why point out that it was OT as if it weren’t good enough, or subservient to NT Scripture?
Because it is worthy of thought. It is the scripture they had. And we need to consider that.
You also need to do some introspections. That I post a simple fact and you are offended says a lot about you. Almost like liberals who are perpetually offended.
I am not offended. Get over yourself.
You’re projecting too much if you can presume to know what I’m thinking.
When more than one person reads something that you posted in a certain way, it’s not everyone else with the communication problem.
Sounds quite Mormon.
They, too, insist that the STH was good enough BEFORE J.Smith, but NOW it needs updating by the Book of Mormon, and Doctrines&Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.