[metmom]

So why’d you blank out ealgeone’s name in your response to his post 347 and post it to nobody?

Did you not want to ping him to it hoping he didn’t see it?

Because posting to no screen name takes a deliberate action of deleting it. It by it’s very nature an intentional act.

[ebb tide]

Yes, it was intentional.

I have my reasons. You can ask him.

[Elsie]

Because posting to no screen name takes a deliberate action of deleting it. It by it’s very nature an intentional act.

But there are FReepers who have thin skin and DEMAND that you post to them no more.

Then, later, they post something that just MUST be responded to, but you've been warned away.

So, you just HAVE to post to 'NOBODY' to prove that FreeRepublic allows back and forth discussions on its website and you will NOT be silenced.

[ealgeone]

So why’d you blank out ealgeone’s name in your response to his post 347 and post it to nobody?

As has been established over the years, ebb cannot handle public debate. He/she is better off in the echo chamber of the caucus threads where he/she can debate him/herself....hence OMCET.