No, it was not on ealgeone. Your comment actually did imply a judgment. I read it that way as well.
Otherwise, why make the distinction? Why point out that it was OT as if it weren't good enough, or subservient to NT Scripture?
the same God breathed out all of it. No one part of it can be of less importance or less worthy than another.
Otherwise, why make the distinction? Why point out that it was OT as if it weren’t good enough, or subservient to NT Scripture?
Because it is worthy of thought. It is the scripture they had. And we need to consider that.
You also need to do some introspections. That I post a simple fact and you are offended says a lot about you. Almost like liberals who are perpetually offended.