Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterPrinciple; ealgeone
No it didn’t, the idea of implied judgment was you.

No, it was not on ealgeone. Your comment actually did imply a judgment. I read it that way as well.

Otherwise, why make the distinction? Why point out that it was OT as if it weren't good enough, or subservient to NT Scripture?

the same God breathed out all of it. No one part of it can be of less importance or less worthy than another.

404 posted on 05/19/2024 7:12:07 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

Otherwise, why make the distinction? Why point out that it was OT as if it weren’t good enough, or subservient to NT Scripture?


Why point it out?

Because it is worthy of thought. It is the scripture they had. And we need to consider that.

You also need to do some introspections. That I post a simple fact and you are offended says a lot about you. Almost like liberals who are perpetually offended.


441 posted on 05/20/2024 7:40:25 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson