But you seem to reject what is in the Bible in deference to what is not in the Bible.
And now I am not in the world, and these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep them in thy name whom thou has given me; that they may be one, as we also are. While I was with them, I kept them in thy name. Those whom thou gavest me have I kept; and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition, that the scripture may be fulfilled.
John 17:11-12
“But you seem to reject what is in the Bible in deference to what is not in the Bible.”
Where in the world did you come up wih that. This thing has gone full circle and collapsed. I not only showed you in the NIV Bible where I read the parts I quoted but gave you a source each of the differing views as quoted two different sources one in Mathew and the other in Acts. Do you bother to read the board before you apply your answer to everything whether it matches or not? If all you’re going to do is troll, leave me out.
wy69
But you seem to reject what is in the Bible in deference to what is not in the Bible.
Placemark
I'll keep that in mind when people who trust the entirety of God's Word (2 Tim 3:16) refer to Mary's sin nature (Rom 3:23), the children she had with Joseph (Mark 3:32 et al), what you call your "priests" (Mt 23:8-12), your transubstantiation problem (Mt 26:26), an most significantly your works-based salvation issues (Rom 10:10-13)
Naturally, you will get all defensive and respond with something unscriptural, thus proving your hypocrisy, by using "everything is not in the Bible" while rejecting what IS in the Bible and complaining about sola scripture. Honestly, you're a broken record.
Or, you'll entice me to run after some red-herring by accusing me of some error that you imagine in your dark little mind.
I've read it all before.
Have a nice day.