[wita]

My question to you: How can multiple thousands of versions of the protestant beliefs all be correct and in agreement with God’s Truths?

Or the tens of millions of Catholic denominations - where each member picks and chooses what to believe and adds whatever else they prefer.

How could they all be true??

They most assuredly can’t be the true Church, but they can contain a potload of truth nevertheless.

That goes for both Protestant and Catholic as well as so called cults which are no more no less engaged in teaching of Jesus Christ and his Gospel as Protestants and Catholics.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

—> My question to you: How can multiple thousands of versions of the protestant beliefs all be correct and in agreement with God’s Truths?

All true believers share the core beliefs of the faith.

Primarily, the Gospel of Grace that alone is the path to salvation.

They also often practice differently.

“ In Essentials Unity, In Non-Essentials Liberty, In All Things Charity”

……….

• My question to you is how can your created Jesus be God, since he hadn’t always existed?

• How could the Mormon father god be god since he was a created being and not eternal?

• How can the Mormon spirit be god since he was created and wasn’t eternal?

• How can you have more than one god who is *sovereign*??
• How can you ever have more than one god who is *omnipotent*?
• How can you have any Mormon god who wasn’t always god, since the God of Scripture is *immutable*?

[daniel1212]

How can multiple thousands of versions of the protestant beliefs all be correct and in agreement with God’s Truths? Or the tens of millions of Catholic denominations - where each member picks and chooses what to believe and adds whatever else they prefer.

Hyperbole much? In a book of almost 800,00 words, with multiple literary genres, and even more idioms/figures of speech, as well as a vast number of topics, and translated from 3 different languages, and in 3 basic types (word for word as KJV, NASB, YLT, versus paraphrase like The "Living Bible", and "dynamic equivalence" like NIV) from two streams of manuscripts, from vast numbers of manuscripts, mostly partial, of copies (due to antiquity) then it is quite Amazing that Bible Christians are overall so unified, so much so that fundamental disagreements usually are a result of holding to another stream of wholly God-inspired revelation, and or uncritical faith in leadership (Catholicism, cults). Or ignorance of basic principals of interpretation, most of which we typically use in everyday communication.

Tell me what fundamental disagreements you think are otherwise.