Please tell why this article and posting is provocative?
I agree with St Peter. Where have I not shown respect?
Certainly, others can have opinions and state their case as to why the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles about the Eucharist are not true.
Jesus told us to share His teachings with all nations. (Mt 28)
If we don’t have civil discussions or study of important beliefs about our eternal life, how will we learn God’s Truth and how to be with God after death? Why do some get upset when the Catholic faith is discussed? They do not have to respond or can respond with their beliefs.
We should be willing to seek God’s Truth, not our truth!
As I indicated, the recent spate of 1,000-post threads were belligerent and argumentative, and this appears to fit right in with them.
Knowing that, as I expect you do, gentleness and respect would have mandated a different approach here to distinguish this post from that stridency. A good question for your introspection might be, “How strenuously did I seek the Holy Spirit’s counsel before I posted this, in discerning how and when He would have me present this?”
God's truth and Rome's 'truth' tend to be a wee bit different in places.
Why is this article and posting is provocative?! Please tell us why posting once again and again on Catholic beliefs which are contrary to evangelical Bible faith is not provocative? Do you have a short memory, or do you want a list of links to vain arguments of RCs - including you - who have previously attempted this one alone?
If I Jesus told us to share His teachings with all nations. (Mt 28)
Jesus did not teach logical fallacies, including your practice of "begging the question," presuming as a conclusion what needs to be established, in this case that what you post is what Jesus told to share with all nations, which as shown, is not what the NT church taught.