[Cronos]

“”No that is simply not true”

wrong — ebb goes on to say that nor is there any record that He ordered his Apostles to write; He did command them to teach and to preach. which is true.

You quote from the book of Revelation, not from the Gospels.

Sorry, but again, you are wrong

[ealgeone]

Yet in all this, there were written accounts. We don't necessarily have to have a command saying....write the following.

We know the writers of the NT were moved by the Spirit to do so.

And there are numerous admonitions by Paul to have his letters read in the various churches.

God established the written word in the OT so the Israelis would have a record.

What Roman Catholicism cannot, or will not do, is point to a conclusive and definitive list of those oral teachings they claim the Jesus and the Apostles handed down. I mean a clear unbroken line from the end of the Apostles to now.

Rome cannot provide that because it simply does not exist.

[daniel1212]

“”No that is simply not true” wrong — ebb goes on to say that nor is there any record that He ordered his Apostles to write; He did command them to teach and to preach. which is true. You quote from the book of Revelation, not from the Gospels. Sorry, but again, you are wrong

Again, you are wrong as explained. The question was "Did Our Lord write any part of the New Testament or command His Apostles to do so?" not simply in the gospels, and indeed the Lord did, both directly (Revelation 1:19) and as obeying His Spirit (Rm. 8:14) -to whom He provided more revelation (John 16:13, 14) for obeying Matthew 28:19, 20). .