Posted on 07/10/2023 4:14:11 PM PDT by Morgana
Pride Shabbat is like Nazi Shabbat. Abomination.
However Woke-ism knows no bounds of decency as it tries to cram itself down everyone's throat.
Fortunately. genuine Islam accepts the prophets of Sodom\Sarc.
Well said. And if their rainbow is 6-banded, they don’t have a rainbow at all.
It’s called public accommodation laws which vary state by state but generally state that you can’t deny services if you’re a public business on reasonable grounds.
The civil rights act goes above and beyond this - not just for public acccomodations but also for things like housing and schooling.
It’s to stop the whole “we don’t serve your kind here” mentality.
Private businesses/clubs were always exempted by these laws… until courts found they weren’t.
..................
She looks like that Dolizol (sp?) fake black lady.
It specializes in Hanukkah hams.
She could pass . A little makeup, and voila !
She eventually had another baker do the work.
So why the arm twisting the ganging up on the other guy, brow beating him trying to coerce this man ?
Leftists and commies, a pox on them.
You’ve never seen hatred until you’ve seen a liberal Jew smear Orthodox.
In college, I was very active at Chabad. Had a professor who routinely smeared Chabad as a “cult” that did not belong on campus.
She would have flunked me, but for the fact all grades were done by number and the class was large.
I think atheists in general, whether they’re Jews or not, are the most hateful. They accuse religious people of being hateful instead, but that’s just projection. With no higher or otherwise outside perspective to view themselves, they can’t see how closely they resemble the false reasons they use to hate everyone else.
Atheists have murdered far more people than all religious wars in the history of man put together.
That’s not hyperbole.
Communists (who are atheists) easily outstrip all other murderous regimes put together, including the Nazis.
Happy to post a link, but it’s an easy Brave search away.
I think I see the problem right here.
Communists are in fact just about all atheists. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. 100 million dead by their hands at least. That sort of outstrips the Crusades or Salem witch trials and atheists always harp about.
Where have we heard that before? Oh, yeah:
I do not get the hypocrisy of wanting kosher goods to celebrate a Torah violation.
I see she has pierced ears, also. Not Orthodox.
Nope, it's a Conservative synagogue. Like some of the Protestants and the Francis Catholics, it's having mission creep.
What are LCMs? Are you referring to the LCMS, the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod, which is orthodox Lutheranism, Bible-believing (sola scriptura) and does not allow women pastors? You may be thinking of the radical leftist ELCA (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America).
Those words from Gorsuch’s opinion are an explanation, illustrating why it is wrong for the state to compel speech that one baker disagrees with as a matter of deeply held personal belief (”hey, Christian, make me a gay cake”) when the state would not compel some other class of baker to act against his or her personal values, such as suing a gay baker for not making an anti-gay cake.
Nope; it’s Conservative.
All of the businesses that have been subjected to these high-visibility lawsuits over not wanting to participate in gay weddings (florist, baker, photographer) have willingly served gay customers in other situations, and have welcomed gay customers to buy pre-made items from their showcases, or custom items for purposes other than affirming gay marriage.
The problem is compelling vendors to do custom creative work to celebrate what they don't believe in, including consultations, appearing to agree in principle with the act of gay marriage, and often going to the venue with their name on their refrigerated truck to participate in setting up for the wedding—which their beliefs say is sinful for their own souls.
That is "compelled speech" that violates the vendors' First Amendment freedom of conscience, and that is what the latest SCOTUS ruling addressed, finally. The Court's previous ruling for the baker Jack Phillips was narrowly about whether the Colorado human rights commission had proper standing to sue him, IIRC; and not about that they were trying to force him to affirm conscience-violating content.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.