Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
You can't help yourself, you need to keep repeating that lie you prefer: "you lot removed books from the Bible as they didn’t agree with the 16th century philosophy."

No matter how many times we post for you the proof that you are spewing a lie, you prefer the lie to the truth. The Rapture, and specifically the pretrib rapture is found taught from the Essene Dead Sea Scrolls hundreds of years before Jesus came and in some of the writings of the early church fathers. But you prefer lies so you keep spewing the spirit of antichrist lies.

Now there is the prophecies of Gad! But you will reject that too since you prefer your comfy lies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YmDZxe5uFU

1,293 posted on 06/07/2022 9:06:48 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1291 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

Kind of funny how the Catholics will intentionally and unrepentantly sin just to try to annoy people they don’t like on the Internet.

I wonder: when they’re suffering in Hell, will they think that it was worth it?


1,295 posted on 06/07/2022 9:10:35 AM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

Which lie? I didn’t repeat the lie that is the pre-tribulation rapture.


1,298 posted on 06/07/2022 9:23:19 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
post #1291
Not really - you lot removed books from the Bible as they didn’t agree with the 16th century philosophy.

Note that Luther had these books in his first version of his bible. As did the first edition of the KJV

the Catholic Church kept books in the Bible that Martin Luther tried to throw out because they didn’t fit his theology.

The Catholic Church organized the Canon of the Bible from many writings that were being circulated that was inspired by the Holy Spirit.

There was no Bible as we know it for the first 350 years of Christianity. Jesus did not give his Apostles a list of the books of the Bible (also known as the canon of Scripture) before he ascended into heaven. Rather, the early leaders of the Church, guided by the Holy Spirit, discerned which books belonged in the Bible. This process took centuries.

The Catholic Church authorized the Canon of the New Testament at the Councils of Carthage, Hippo & Rome about 390 AD, from what was read at Mass for the previous 400 years, as inspired by the Holy Spirit.

It also included the Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament as that was the main language spoken in the 1st century that the New Testament either quotes or refers to over 300 times to only about 30 times for the Hebrew version that Martin Luther put in his Bible.

The Bible is a Catholic Book.

In other words, the Word of God was mostly taught orally for the first 400 years of Christianity. There were no “Bible Alone” Protestants then.

Pope Damasus commissioned St. Jerome to translate the Old Testament, The Septuagint with 46 books, along with the New Testament, from Greek, Hebrew & Aramaic, into the Latin Vulgate for a total of 73 books which was the official Bible of the Catholic Church about 400 AD.

1,302 posted on 06/07/2022 9:45:36 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
The pretrib rapture is NOT found in the writings of Ephraem - as you falsely claimed before

Now you say MhginTN the pretrib rapture is found taught from the Essene Dead Sea Scrolls hundreds of years before Jesus came

err.. nope -- absolutely NOTHING about a pre-tribulation rapture

Can you make ANY statement for your claim that "the pre trib rapture is found in the Dead sea scrolls"???

1,303 posted on 06/07/2022 9:48:55 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

I finally had time to view this video by Ken Johnson. I have been working a lot of hours and its canning season. Just a few comments.

He mentions satan accusing the saints at the judgment.(about 17:30 in the video) Revelation 20 seems to put Satan in the lake of fire before the books were opened.

At about the 38 minute mark he says that Ruth became an Israelite. This is not in the Bible and is conspicuous by its absence. Ruth is called a Moabitess and is typical of the PTR. She is not mentioned again after the birth of Obed. The women said “a child is born unto Naomi.”


2,649 posted on 06/19/2022 1:02:43 PM PDT by Seven_0 (You cannot fool all of the people, ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson