HMMMmmm...
Nothing in Scripture teaches that original sin is some sort of disease transmitted exclusively by fathers to their children. That may be your understanding, but the Bible doesn't require it.
Our understanding is that it's more like a failure to transmit grace and other gifts which, had the fall not occurred, would have been transmitted in the natural process of childbearing.
I mention serpent seed as a symbol.
It’s a biological process though in the natural, but has a spiritual theme too.
Man’s sperm looks like a serpent.
Females egg looks earth like
Sperm is cast to the egg. And Conception occurs.
The bible appears to have 3 people that were not conceived that way.
Adam, dust from the ground
Eve, formed from the rib
Christ, Conceived of the Holy Spirit
Human flesh was to be eternal.
No corruption.
Until sin.
Then, the wages of sin is that human flesh is no longer eternal.
It’s got a shelf life..
All humanity has that flesh.
That flesh is sinful.
That’s the same flesh Mary had.
That’s the same flesh Christ had.
Christ now has Glorified, immortal, never to decay flesh after His death,burial and resurrection. He truly is First Fruits of all of those who have fallen asleep.
He is now also the High Priest
14Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold firmly to what we profess. 15For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who was tempted in every way that we are, yet was without sin.
His Holy Divinity is incapable of being tempted. God can’t be tempted.For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone.”
So what was tempted?
It’s got to be His flesh was tempted.
The same flesh we all receive.
But again, with one thing different..
Our fathers seed vs. His Father’s Holy Spirit
That’s what I was trying to explain..
Christ either came in the flesh or not.
You may not feel like that’s what’s being discussed in John’s warning about Antichrist.
I read it differently.
And what’s really odd, is that it isn’t even a doctrine about Christ.
It’s about His Mother.
Who is not Divine.
It’s a confusing doctrine that travels down a path that I see as teaching that Mary and Christ were not born with the same sinful human flesh nature..
And if by itself, it wouldn’t be as alarming , but it is a doctrine that focused on Mary like the 15 Promises that this same Immaculately Conceived Mary was declaring.
And testing those 15 promises with scripture, and they are certainly not scriptural.
I look for the Immaculate Conception and there is one there.
Christ.
Conceived of the Holy Spirit
Mary.
Not so much.
I wouldn’t be the first to call the Papacy Antichrist.
It doesn’t help itself with Immaculate Conception of Mary, Mary’s 15 promises, false goddess frigg day as a substitute for Passover.
They set themselves to be at odds with the scriptures.
The scriptures is the only place for Truth.
His Word is Truth..
I don’t see Immaculate Conception of Mary in scripture.
I don’t see the 15 Promises of Mary in scripture.
I don’t see false goddess frigg day in scripture.
It’s almost like Christ’s prediction came true.
There were going to be False Christ’s.
And Paul warns about another Jesus and another gospel.
There may be another Mary added in.
Take care in this wilderness
HMMMmmm...