[MurphsLaw]

“No one can add to revelation. That was given once for all; – but as time goes on,
what was given once for all is understood more and more clearly.”

St. Cdl. John Henry Newman

[Mr. K]

Yes we should spend hours and hours and hours discussing whether or not Mary was a virgin. And then more hours, and then more hours.

Because this will solve all the worlds problems. There is Nothing More important to discuss.

[Jan_Sobieski]

A person who believes Immaculate Conception is a dunce.

[ryderann]

The girls of my generation got pregnant from the toilet seat.

[viewfromthefrontier]

If there is no difficulty in saying that Eve was created without sin – if there is no risk of turning her into a deity – what is the great difficulty in saying that Mary was created without sin?

I was thinking about this today. Maybe our Protestant friends choose not to believe all Catholicism teaches about Mary but I do not understand the hostility. Won't we all be without sin in heaven? Why couldn't God create a human without original sin to bear His Son? Why wouldn't He? It is in fact appropriate for Him to do so.

[boatbums]

Do you spend a lot of time searching for articles to stir the pot with “Protestants”?

[Jim Noble]

The problem, of course, is that there is no end to development of doctrine, such that a woman can be called a man and vice-versa, because “what was given once for all is understood more and more clearly.”

This is the claim made over and over again by the US Supreme Court in setting forth its more and more radical doctrines.

[musicman]

Less Than $916 To Go!!
Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR
This Quarter

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!