The temple was not destroyed in 167 BC, Antiochus IV Epiphanes desecrated it, did not destroy it.
The Jews believed that was the end, they were wrong as Jesus told them as recorded in the Olivet discourse that the abomination would occur during the lifetime of his listeners.
This false non Christian teaching like your own gospel of the devil, leads people away from God. Why do you persist in your teachings of your father, who isn’t God?
Christ sail allllll but the ‘very elect’ would be deceived... The ‘very elect’ were chosen before the katabol... casting down of the serpent... NO man has authority to call, label, or sprinkle hot water making anyone a ‘saint’, elect, or chosen ... The Heavenly Father, not some mere mortal already called out HIS chosen/elect.
But 70AD did not see the AoD stand in the holy place doing what 2 Ths. 2 describes, and like as Antiochus was a precursor of a future fulfillment so also is 70AD which also did not see the things prophesied would occur on the earth before the Lord's return.
This false non Christian teaching like your own gospel of the devil, leads people away from God. Why do you persist in your teachings of your father, who isn’t God?
A fallacious bombastic bloviating charge befitting a deceptive foreign agent while I have substantiated how the gospel of Rome is the false one, versus salvation by effectual penitent heart-purifying regenerating faith, (Acts 10:43-47; 15:7-9) that is imputed for righteousness, (Romans 4:5) whereby the redeemed soul is "accepted in the Beloved." (Ephesians 1:6) And the same will go to be with the Lord at death or at His return (Luke 23:43 [cf. 2 Cor. 12:4; Rv. 2:7]; Phil 1:23; 2Cor. 5:8 [“we”]; 1Cor. 15:51ff; 1Thess. 4:17 ) if they have persevered in faith. (Heb. 3:9-14; 10:25-39; Gal. 5:1-4) Glory and thanks be to God.