Which perverse reasoning is another testimony against being a RC.
The Lutherans hold that there is the True Presence of Christ in the Eucharist -- you deny that. So in the core fundamentals, you and the Lutherans (of all kinds) fundamentally disagree So you can't call yourself in the same basket as Lutherans and Oneness Pentecostals as you disagree with them on fundamentals like the Eucharist and the Trinity
So rather than admit that you are arguing against something I did not say, and that what I did say remains substantiated, you just reiterate your strawman, and thus again provide an argument against being a RC.
Nah, it’s about the Oneness Pentecostals who deny the Trinity. You fundamentally disagree with them and others and yet build your strawmen arguments against orthodoxy, right?