This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 11/12/2019 11:45:53 AM PST by Religion Moderator, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 11/12/2019 5:43:15 AM PST by Cronos
Actually, no, Cronos.
The harpadzo, the sudden catching-up, the snatching-away, the rapiemur (from the Latin of the Vulgate), the Rapture, is a concept of how regenerated believers are to meet the Lord in the air, a prophecy accepted by the early churches, but buried for many centuries by the unbelieving Roman dogmatizers, until the idea of an Antichrist in a 7-year Tribulation was dug out by Catholic priests in the 1500s, the Rapture by Puritans in America in the 1600s, later on popularized--not invented--by John Darby and the "Plymouth" brethren in the 1800s, and magnified by the Schofield Reference Bible first published in the early 1900s.
Your miscommunication marks you as a commenter that cannot be relied on, Cronos.
That should be your primary concern.
Still awaiting your answer on the Brown Scapular....but I think I know the answer.
Thank you for that link. Very interesting.
Really? Then why not believe in the words of Jesus Himself who spoke of the tribulation of 60 to 70 AD and of the destruction of the Temple.
Jesus’s apocalyptic prophesy was fulfilled.
If one trusts in Christ, one will reject the pre-Trib rap fantasy.
The question is...are you trusting in Christ and Christ alone or do you believe the non-Biblical, non-Christian Pre-Trib rap fantasy?
You might want to check that. The ECFs are against you on this...as is Scripture.
Yes, because the Child in Rev 12 is clearly Jesus, and the dragon is clearly the devil personified through his minion, Herod, but the woman ... she can't be an individual, she can only be a kind of a symbol of something ... we're not sure exactly what, but it's not very important. Although every Scripture is God-breathed and useful for instruction in righteousness, except ones the Catholics like, like this one. /s
Ok...IF I were to reject the rapture but have faith in Christ I'm still good.
IF the Rapture is true and I have faith in Christ, I'm still good.
******
Now, for you....if you're trusting in the Brown Scapular + Christ, you're toast.
We can keep playing.
You're not sure? When Rome writes very clearly this is Mary??
Whoa....it is VERY important in Roman Catholicism, though not NT Christianity.
Perhaps you don't know what your denomination really teaches.
I call that my “goldilocks” link. Not too shallow and not too “into the weeds”. It is in book form as well.
Selah ... pause here readers, to hear what the Spirit says.
You are a liar and mock the Truth in scriptures by adding your special lying twist to the Hisotry and the scriptures.
I repeat, for the moderator, Cronos is a liar and the truth is not in him.
Cronos is not correct, but it is understandable that a fellow Catholic cannot discern the Truth.
So now you twist what I write also? Typical of the father of lies children.
Here’s what I’ve always wondered. They say when the Rapture happens, planes will fall from the sky as pilots are raptured, the freeways will be a horror because drivers will be raptured, etc. And there will be piles of clothing everywhere, since of course God is not going to “rapture” our clothes. So by that logic, the piles will also contain things like toupees, false teeth, and breast implants. So— will we all be gathered in Heaven somewhere, naked, saying things to each other like, “Sorry, Todd, I don’t understand you without your false teeth,” or “Wow, Megan, obviously you had a mastectomy on earth, I didn’t know”? I suppose we’ll be so happy to have been raptured, we won’t care about things like that, nor will we be embarrassed about our loved ones going through the piles we left behind. But does it seem logical? And why would God want our old, fallible bodies, anyway? If he was going to rapture us, why wouldn’t He just rapture our souls and leave our bodies behind?
This already long and indecisive thread is a perfect argument against the reformation and sola scriptura In general.
Beloved John wrote the Book of the Revelation long after the destruction of the Second Temple, predicted by Jesus, and which occurred in year 70 of our secular calendar. In 70 AD Vespasian was the Caesar.
Please stop misadvising FReepers, Cronos.
You are exhibiting the characteristics of your father, the father of lies who twists and deceives.
Is the link to your blog site?
“Then why not believe in the words of Jesus Himself who spoke of the tribulation of 60 to 70 AD and of the destruction of the Temple.”
Maybe because the prophecy has not been fulfilled .
Mat 24:30-31, And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory, and he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Um....No.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.