Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

“So now it reads that you’re saying that Jesus is not the Second Person of the Trinity, God Incarnate.
Interesting.......”

I never said anything remotely like that. Why do you have to resort to posting falsehoods?


317 posted on 08/20/2019 5:49:12 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; vladimir998
MM: “So now it reads that you’re saying that Jesus is not the Second Person of the Trinity, God Incarnate. Interesting.......”

vlad: There was no Jesus before Jesus was formed in the womb. That’s exactly what John 1 tells us. There was the Second Person of the Trinity but no Jesus.

[But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable'— they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

322 posted on 08/20/2019 5:53:45 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson