Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

Wow, you’re really looking desperate. You took four posts to respond to just one of mine and more than once you resort to silly insults because you apparently can’t make an actual argument against what I posted.

“LOL, you can prove none of it.”

You can’t disprove any of it. You keep showing that. Thanks.

“Prove your assertion that Jesus took on flesh from MAry.”

Did you or did you not take on flesh from your mother? Every baby does. Jesus was a baby in Mary’s womb. Refute that. You’ll fail.

“You want an example of Catholic presumption?... “He took on humanity - from His mother, Mary.””

It’s logic, not presumption. Did you or did you not take on flesh from your mother?


245 posted on 08/20/2019 4:40:03 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
Get back on your meds, you're missing a lot. Re read my posts then answer the question posed: Can you prove from whence came the chromosomal complement that Jesus used?

The limits of your education are being exposed:

"Did you or did you not take on flesh from your mother? (As one half of my chromosome complement, yes. That leads to asking if you can prove half of the chromosomes in Jesus came from Mary, which you absolutely cannot prove but you assume it. Assumption, not logical connection)
Every baby does. ( Funny how Catholic Apologists will assume something then use that assumption as if it is a fact in evidence. You fail, apologist.. BTW, your specious assertion that since Jesus was a baby His gestation was exactly like every other baby, when you can see from the Scriptures that His gestational life was supernaturally derived thus He was not like every other baby in His natal age.)
Jesus was a baby in Mary’s womb. Refute that. You’ll fail. (It is you who has failed. Not surprising given your background in the mythos of Catholiciism)

You pose cleverly devised statements, but such cleverness exposes your lack of education regarding embryology and gestational existence for all but one human being. The creation of the body for The Son of God was a supernatural occurrence that your natural mind seeks to make into just another natural conception.

It is apparent that you have made several assumptions to support your assertions, not the least of which error is assuming half of the chromosomes in Jesus derived from Mary, as if God inseminated Mary's ovum. When challenged you revert to the childish 'you make no logical arguments'. The FACT is you are making assertions without any ability to prove those Catholic assertions.

Here's a piece of evidemce from Scripture to expose your assumptions: the Word of God tells us Mary conceived in her body. That does not say anything about her chromosome complement it just tells us the embryo of Jesus implanted in her uterine wall, in her womb. After that implantation the growing of the placenta and the body for life in the air world is solely the work of the newly implanted life. The body in which the implantation occurs adds not a single chromosome to that gestation person.

The natural man cannot fathom the spiritual for it is alien to the natural mind.

272 posted on 08/20/2019 10:40:47 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson